Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Algorithms (2)
- Aba Accreditation Standards (1)
- Academic Freedom (1)
- Asset Management (1)
- Auditing (1)
-
- Bias (1)
- Business Entities (1)
- Capture (1)
- Charitable Contribution Deduction (1)
- Civil Society (1)
- Classification Bias (1)
- Clinical Faculty (1)
- Collaborative Gatekeepers (1)
- Conflicts of Interest (1)
- Corporate Liability (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Data Analytics (1)
- Data Mining (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Disparate Impact (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Employment Discrimination (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Financial Crisis (1)
- Financial Stability (1)
- Gatekeeper Liability (1)
- Gatekeepers (1)
- Global Administrative Law (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Industry Associations (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Remaking Of Wall Street, Andrew F. Tuch
The Remaking Of Wall Street, Andrew F. Tuch
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article critically examines the transformation of the financial services industry during and since the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009. This transformation has been marked by the demise of the major investment banks and the related rise of a set of powerful players known as private equity firms or alternative asset managers – pools of assets structured as private funds. First, this Article argues that private equity firms now mirror investment banks in their mix of activities; ethos of entrepreneurialism, innovation, and risk-taking; role as “shadow banks”; and overall power and influence.
These similarities might suggest that private equity firms pose …
The Limits Of Gatekeeper Liability, Andrew F. Tuch
The Limits Of Gatekeeper Liability, Andrew F. Tuch
Scholarship@WashULaw
Gatekeeper liability – the framework under which actors such as law firms, investment banks and accountants face liability for the wrongs committed by their corporate clients – is one of the most widely used strategies for controlling corporate wrongdoing. It nevertheless faces well-recognized flaws: gatekeepers often depend financially on the clients whose conduct they monitor; to carry out their gatekeeping function, gatekeepers rely on individuals – often their employees – whose interests diverge from their own; and major transactions typically involve multiple gatekeepers, each with specific areas of expertise and information, which produces both gaps and overlaps in the gatekeeping …
Astroturf Activism, Melinda (M.J.) Durkee
Astroturf Activism, Melinda (M.J.) Durkee
Scholarship@WashULaw
Corporate influence in government is more than a national issue; it is an international phenomenon. For years, businesses have been infiltrating international legal processes. They secretly lobby lawmakers through front groups: “astroturf” imitations of grassroots organizations. But because this business lobbying is covert, it has been underappreciated in both the literature and the law. This Article unearths the “astroturf activism” phenomenon. It offers an original descriptive account that classifies modes of business access to international officials and identifies harms, then develops a critical analysis of the laws that regulate this access. I show that the perplexing set of access rules …
Inequality And The Mortgage Interest Deduction, Kyle Rozema, Daniel J. Hemel
Inequality And The Mortgage Interest Deduction, Kyle Rozema, Daniel J. Hemel
Scholarship@WashULaw
The mortgage interest deduction is often criticized for contributing to after-tax income inequality. Yet the effects of the mortgage interest deduction on income inequality are more nuanced than the conventional wisdom would suggest. We show that the mortgage interest deduction causes high-income households (i.e., those in the top 10% and top 1%) to bear a larger share of the total tax burden than they would if the deduction were repealed. We further show that the effect of the mortgage interest deduction on income inequality is highly sensitive to the alternative scenario against which the deduction is evaluated. These findings demonstrate …
Aba Standard 405(C): Two Steps Forward And One Step Back For Legal Education, Peter A. Joy
Aba Standard 405(C): Two Steps Forward And One Step Back For Legal Education, Peter A. Joy
Scholarship@WashULaw
There has long been opposition to guaranteeing that all full-time law faculty have security of position and participation in faculty governance the same as or substantially similar to tenure. ABA Accreditation Standard 405(c), was meant to provide such security of position and faculty governance for clinical faculty, though this standard has not been consistently interpreted to do so. The situation for legal writing faculty is even more precarious, because the standards only require a law school to provide legal writing faculty with the security of position and other rights necessary to attract and retain well-qualified faculty. As a result, most …
Data-Driven Discrimination At Work, Pauline Kim
Data-Driven Discrimination At Work, Pauline Kim
Scholarship@WashULaw
A data revolution is transforming the workplace. Employers are increasingly relying on algorithms to decide who gets interviewed, hired, or promoted. Although data algorithms can help to avoid biased human decision-making, they also risk introducing new sources of bias. Algorithms built on inaccurate, biased, or unrepresentative data can produce outcomes biased along lines of race, sex, or other protected characteristics. Data mining techniques may cause employment decisions to be based on correlations rather than causal relationships; they may obscure the basis on which employment decisions are made; and they may further exacerbate inequality because error detection is limited and feedback …
Auditing Algorithms For Discrimination, Pauline Kim
Auditing Algorithms For Discrimination, Pauline Kim
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Essay responds to the argument by Joshua Kroll, et al., in Accountable Algorithms, 165 U.PA.L.REV. 633 (2017), that technical tools can be more effective in ensuring the fairness of algorithms than insisting on transparency. When it comes to combating discrimination, technical tools alone will not be able to prevent discriminatory outcomes. Because the causes of bias often lie, not in the code, but in broader social processes, techniques like randomization or predefining constraints on the decision-process cannot guarantee the absence of bias. Even the most carefully designed systems may inadvertently encode preexisting prejudices or reflect structural bias. For this …