Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative agencies (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Congressional bureaucracy (1)
- Constitutional Criminal Procedure (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Feminism (1)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Gender in society (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justice Scalia (1)
- Legal developments (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Public choice theory (1)
- Saint John's Law Review (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Walder v. United States (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Book Review: Slave Law In The Americas, David S. Bogen
Book Review: Slave Law In The Americas, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Half Century Of The Maryland Law Review, William L. Reynolds
A Half Century Of The Maryland Law Review, William L. Reynolds
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
Legal Process And Judges In The Real World, Peter L. Strauss
Legal Process And Judges In The Real World, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
It is gratifying, reading through a paper and noting here and there points that you might like to make, to find that by the end the author has anticipated them and made them well. This paper sneaks up on you. If at the outset it seems to be accepting that Justice Scalia has a jurisprudence of statutory interpretation that coheres and restrains, by the end it has shown the self-contradictions and decidedly political and institutional stakes in the textualist position the Justice appears to have been carving out for himself.
I am not going to address Professor Zeppos's account of …
Feminist Jurisprudence: Why Law Must Consider Women's Perspectives, Ann Juergens
Feminist Jurisprudence: Why Law Must Consider Women's Perspectives, Ann Juergens
Faculty Scholarship
A growing number of scholars are asking how the law would be different if it took women's points of view and experiences into account. Feminist Jurisprudence argues that we must look at the norms embedded in our legal system and rethink the law. It is about being inclusive of women, and of all people who differ from the norms of the law as it is today. The endeavor will necessarily shake up established relations between family, the workplace and the state. Lawyers, judges, and legislators should get ready for the changes.
Justice Brennan, Peter L. Strauss
Justice Brennan, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
The editors of the St. John's Law Review have given me the boon of a few pages in which to celebrate Justice Brennan with you. The problem for a former law clerk, for anyone who has known this man, is to know where to begin, and how to keep the appreciation within manageable compass.
Sunstein, Statutes, And The Common Law – Reconciling Markets, The Communal Impulse, And The Mammoth State, Peter L. Strauss
Sunstein, Statutes, And The Common Law – Reconciling Markets, The Communal Impulse, And The Mammoth State, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Cass Sunstein's new book, After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, builds upon, and in important ways seeks to integrate, much of Professor Sunstein's work over the past several years. He has been one of our most prolific and influential writers on issues of governmental structure, approaching the subject both from more or less conventional administrative law perspectives and from the constitutional perspectives of separation of powers. His work has dealt with a tension often addressed in the literature, that between the eighteenth-century Madisonian constitutional engine of limited, internally checked government and the realities of our sprawling …