Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- City (3)
- Civil procedure (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
-
- Court (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Double jeopardy (3)
- Federal (3)
- Mistrial (3)
- New york (3)
- Prejudice (3)
- State (3)
- Supreme court (3)
- Brown (2)
- Retrial (2)
- 25th Amendment (1)
- A sitting president (1)
- Aisha Scholes (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Article 1 (1)
- Article 2 (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Boneta (1)
- Charging decisions. (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Clause 6 (1)
- Clause 7 (1)
- Conflicts of interest (1)
- Consent (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Emperor’S New Clothes: An Intersection Of Presidential Immunity And Criminal Accountability, Nicholas J. Maggio
The Emperor’S New Clothes: An Intersection Of Presidential Immunity And Criminal Accountability, Nicholas J. Maggio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Relationships And Ethics In The Land Use Game, Patricia E. Salkin, Thomas Brown, Aisha Scholes
Relationships And Ethics In The Land Use Game, Patricia E. Salkin, Thomas Brown, Aisha Scholes
Scholarly Works
Ethical considerations in the land use decision making process can be organized into a number of categories, including, first and foremost, the broad subject of conflicts of interest.1 Players in the land use game can find themselves in real or perceived conflicts situations based on personal financial interests resulting from investments, including businesses and real estate holdings (such as the location of their property vis-à-vis the location of the subject property before the Board), employment for themselves or members of their immediate family, and memberships in nonprofit organizations that may be either passive or active (e.g., simply dues paying member …
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Disciplinary Regulation Of Prosecutorial Discretion: What Would A Rule Look Like?, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
This Essay is the third part of a larger project examining the potential role of professional discipline in the regulation and supervision of prosecutors’ charging decisions. The first two parts of the project argued that courts have both the authority and the ability to exercise effective disciplinary review of charging decisions through the adoption of ethics rules and their enforcement in the disciplinary process. This Essay takes the next step in the project, considering the nature of rules that courts might adopt, by exploring potential rules targeting two improprieties: arbitrary and capricious charging decisions, and discriminatory charging decisions.