Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- History (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law libraries (2)
- Library automation (2)
-
- System migration (2)
- Vendors (2)
- ANSI-NISO (1)
- Academic law libraries (1)
- Acquittal rates (1)
- American legal thought (1)
- Anti-intellectualism (1)
- Bibliographic data (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Buying and contracting (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Clean records (1)
- Common law (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Connectivity (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Contract negotiation (1)
- Criminal justice reform (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Dumb terminals (1)
- England (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Functionality (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Anti-Intellectualism, Pierre Schlag
Migration: A Natural Growth Process For Libraries (Part One Of Two), Georgia Briscoe
Migration: A Natural Growth Process For Libraries (Part One Of Two), Georgia Briscoe
Publications
No abstract provided.
Why Not A Shared Database For Legal Serial Patterns?, Georgia K. Briscoe
Why Not A Shared Database For Legal Serial Patterns?, Georgia K. Briscoe
Publications
Just as bibliographic records are shared by law libraries through a national database, serial publication pattern data could also be shared. The author presents a history of the movement toward such a database and offers a specific proposal for its creation.
Migration: A Natural Growth Process For Libraries (Part Two Of Two), Georgia Briscoe
Migration: A Natural Growth Process For Libraries (Part Two Of Two), Georgia Briscoe
Publications
No abstract provided.
A Holistic Approach To Criminal Justice Scholarship, William T. Pizzi
A Holistic Approach To Criminal Justice Scholarship, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Forty Years In The Desert, Paul F. Campos
Forty Years In The Desert, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The author uses Brown v. Board of Education and the volumes of commentary it has provoked to illustrate that coherent constitutional interpretation is a useless exercise. He argues that the decision should be accepted as political reality and moral necessity and that we should cease debating its merit as constitutional interpretation.