Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Book review (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion as self-defense (1)
- Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Eileen McDonagh (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Individual rights (1)
- Law and morality (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Lesser life (1)
- Non-consensual pregnancy (1)
- Positive Constitution (1)
- Professional responsibility (1)
- Progressivism (1)
- Role morality (1)
- State funding of abortions (1)
- The Practice of Justice (1)
- Wealth redistribution (1)
- William Simon (1)
- Zealous advocacy (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Progressivism is in part a particular moral and political response to the sadness of lesser lives, lives unnecessarily diminished by economic, psychic and physical insecurity in the midst of a society or world that offers plenty. This insecurity is unjust and should end; the suffering should be alleviated, and those lives should be enriched. To do so must be one of the goals of a morally just or justifiable state. Not all suffering and not all lesser lives, of course, give rise to such a response. The suffering attendant to accident, disease, war and happenstance is neither entirely chargeable to …
The Zealous Advocacy Of Justice In A Less Than Ideal Legal World, Robin West
The Zealous Advocacy Of Justice In A Less Than Ideal Legal World, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In The Practice of Justice, William Simon addresses a widely recognized dilemma -- the moral degradation of the legal profession that seems to be the unpleasant by-product of an adversarial system of resolving disputes -- with a bold claim: Lawyers involved in either the representation of private rights or the public interest should be zealous advocates of justice, rather than their clients' interests. If lawyers were to do what this reorientation of their basic identity would dictate -- that is, if lawyers were to zealously pursue justice according to law, rather than zealously pursue through all marginally lawful means whatever …
Liberalism And Abortion, Robin West
Liberalism And Abortion, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
First in a groundbreaking book, Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent, published in 1996, then in various public fora, from academic conference panels to Christian radio call-in shows, and now in a major law review article entitled My Body, My Consent: Securing the Constitutional Right to Abortion Funding, Eileen McDonagh has sought to redefine drastically our understanding of the still deeply contested right to an abortion, and hence, of the nature of the constitutional protections which in her view this embattled right deserves. Her argument is complicated and subtle, but its basic thrust can be readily …
Rawls’ Political Constructivism As A Judicial Heuristic: A Response To Professor Allen, Heidi Li Feldman
Rawls’ Political Constructivism As A Judicial Heuristic: A Response To Professor Allen, Heidi Li Feldman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In her Dunwody Lecture, Professor Anita Allen insightfully calls our attention to the social contract tropes that pepper American case law. She claims that these tropes function ideologically, disguising politics, biases, and raw power in judicial decision-making. To examine this claim, I distinguish two versions of social contract theory Professor Allen groups together. Metaphors drawn from classical social contract theory-epitomized by the work of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau may well function as Professor Allen suspects. Tools taken from twentieth century neo-Kantian social contract theory-inaugurated and developed by John Rawls-could have precisely the opposite effect. Rawlsian social contract theory might …