Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law firms (2)
- Law schools (2)
- Law students (2)
- Lawyers (2)
- Alumni (1)
-
- Breach of promise lawsuits (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Careers (1)
- Cause of action (1)
- Children (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Educational loans (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Gender and law (1)
- Job choice (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Jury system (1)
- Law and psychology (1)
- Law student debt (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Mock jury study (1)
- Plaintiffs (1)
- Presumption of innocence (1)
- Private citizens (1)
- Public interest attorneys (1)
- Reasonable doubt rule (1)
- Salaries (1)
- Satisfaction (1)
- Social science research (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Educational Debts And The Worsening Position Of Small-Firm, Government, And Legal-Services Lawyers, David L. Chambers
Educational Debts And The Worsening Position Of Small-Firm, Government, And Legal-Services Lawyers, David L. Chambers
Articles
Law school operating costs are up. Tuitions are up. The debts of law students are up. What is happening to the students who have borrowed large sums? Are their debts affecting their decisions about the jobs to seek? Once in practice, are they significantly affecting the standard of living they can afford to maintain? What, in particular, is the effect of debts on those who enter-or contemplate entering-small firms, government, legal services, and "public interest" work where salaries are lower than in most other settings in which lawyers work? In the preceding essay, Jack Kramer has performed another extremely valuable …
Are Twelve Heads Better Than One?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Are Twelve Heads Better Than One?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Few advocates of the jury system would argue that the average juror is as competent a tribunal as the averagejudge. Whatever competence the jury has is a function of two of its attributes: its number and its interaction. The fact that a jury must be composed of at least six people,' with different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives, provides some protection against decisions based on an idiosyncratic view of the facts. Not only must the jury include at least six people, but they must be chosen in a manner that conforms to the ideal of the jury as representative of community …
Accommodation And Satisfaction: Women And Men Lawyers And The Balance Of Work And Family, David L. Chambers
Accommodation And Satisfaction: Women And Men Lawyers And The Balance Of Work And Family, David L. Chambers
Articles
This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principalr esponsibilitiesf or the care of children, but it alsof inds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.
Is Abandoning State Action Asking Too Much Of The Constitution, Scott E. Sundby
Is Abandoning State Action Asking Too Much Of The Constitution, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Reasonable Doubt Rule And The Meaning Of Innocence, Scott E. Sundby
The Reasonable Doubt Rule And The Meaning Of Innocence, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Agency And Partnership: A Study Of Breach Of Promise Plaintiffs, Mary I. Coombs
Agency And Partnership: A Study Of Breach Of Promise Plaintiffs, Mary I. Coombs
Articles
No abstract provided.