Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

An Act To Declare That The United States Shall Hold Certain Land In Trust For The Three Affiliated Tribes Of The Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota, United States Congress Oct 1969

An Act To Declare That The United States Shall Hold Certain Land In Trust For The Three Affiliated Tribes Of The Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota, United States Congress

US Government Documents related to Indigenous Nations

This United States (US) Public Law, also known as US Public Law 91-100, passed on October 30, 1969 provides that all lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota deemed to be in excess to the needs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs will be held in trust for the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation by the United States. The law outlines the parameters of the lands and specifies that this act must operate in accordance with the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1050).


Political Defamation: The Price Of Candidacy, James H. Mccauley Jun 1969

Political Defamation: The Price Of Candidacy, James H. Mccauley

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Representation And Election: The Reapportionment Cases In Retrospect, William P. Irwin Feb 1969

Representation And Election: The Reapportionment Cases In Retrospect, William P. Irwin

Michigan Law Review

In general, both in the two-year interval between Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims and in the period following the reapportionment decisions of June 1964, discussion of the issue among scholars and publicists has tended to center upon four problems of varying scope and precision: (1) the jurisdiction of the federal courts to pass upon aspects of state legislative apportionment; (2) the justiciability of the same matter; (3) the substantive merits of the several cases; and, (4) the implications of the decisions for democratic theory and practice. No attempt is made here to reopen the argument about federal jurisdiction; …


Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff Jan 1969

Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff

Publications

No abstract provided.


Review Of Concerning Dissent And Civil Disobedience, By A. Fortas, Terrance Sandalow Jan 1969

Review Of Concerning Dissent And Civil Disobedience, By A. Fortas, Terrance Sandalow

Reviews

Noah Chomsky has written of Justice Fortas' essay that it "is not serious enough for extended discussion." It would be a mistake to dismiss the essay so lightly. The prestige of Justice Fortas' office almost inevitably will gain for the essay an audience it would not otherwise have had, among whom will be those who will confuse the office with the argument. For some this confusion will insulate the argument from criticism. For others it will tarnish the office.


Federal Revenue Sharing, H. Rutherford Turnbull Iii Jan 1969

Federal Revenue Sharing, H. Rutherford Turnbull Iii

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Duty Of Newspapers To Accept Political Advertising - An Attack On Tradition, William A. Resneck Jan 1969

The Duty Of Newspapers To Accept Political Advertising - An Attack On Tradition, William A. Resneck

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.