Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Tale Of Two Formalisms: How Law And Economics Mirrors Originalism And Textualism, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
A Tale Of Two Formalisms: How Law And Economics Mirrors Originalism And Textualism, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
UF Law Faculty Publications
Two leading schools of thought among U.S. conservative legal elites — Law and Economics (L&E) and Originalism and Textualism (O&T) — both purport to use their formalist structures to guide analysis in ways that are objective, substantially determinate, and apolitical. Because they rest on very different theoretical underpinnings, L&E and O&T should only randomly reach similar policy or legal conclusions. After all, L&E implements neoclassical economics, a theory of utility maximization, whereas O&T is a theory of semantics. Yet as practiced, L&E and O&T rarely result in conflict. What explains the missing intra-conservative clash? Despite their respective pretenses to objectivity, …