Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Obstaculos Juridicos Y Economicos A La Aplicacion De La Teoria Del Incumplimiento Eficiente: ¿Un Irritante Juridico O Una Figura De Aplicacion Imposible?, Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
Obstaculos Juridicos Y Economicos A La Aplicacion De La Teoria Del Incumplimiento Eficiente: ¿Un Irritante Juridico O Una Figura De Aplicacion Imposible?, Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
¿Interpretamos La Voluntad Del Testador O Sólo Lo Literalmente Expresado En El Testamento?: Consideraciones Desde La Óptica De La Comparación Jurídica, Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
¿Interpretamos La Voluntad Del Testador O Sólo Lo Literalmente Expresado En El Testamento?: Consideraciones Desde La Óptica De La Comparación Jurídica, Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
Renzo E. Saavedra Velazco
Panelist, Unexplored Terrain: Companies, Trade Associations And Risk, Kent Greenfield
Panelist, Unexplored Terrain: Companies, Trade Associations And Risk, Kent Greenfield
Kent Greenfield
No abstract provided.
The Persistence Of Low Expectations In Special Education Law Viewed Through The Lens Of Therapeutic Jurisprduence, Richard Peterson
The Persistence Of Low Expectations In Special Education Law Viewed Through The Lens Of Therapeutic Jurisprduence, Richard Peterson
Richard Peterson
For more than thirty-five years a paradigm of low expectations has infected efforts to educate children with disabilities and has been a persistent and stubborn obstacle to the successful implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and its predecessor, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). This dilemma raises questions addressed in this paper: What is meant by low expectations in the context of Special Education Law? What are the root causes of this phenomenon, and what makes it so resistant to change? How does it impede implementation of the IDEA? And lastly, in what ways does …
Harm, Ambiguity, And The Regulation Of Illegal Contracts, Adam B. Badawi
Harm, Ambiguity, And The Regulation Of Illegal Contracts, Adam B. Badawi
Adam B. Badawi
Prohibitions on contract are a common technique for achieving desired policy outcomes. By deeming certain bargains unlawful or contrary to public policy, judges and other policy actors expect to prevent some of the harm that these contracts can create. The presumptive remedy used to accomplish this goal is non-enforcement—which leaves the parties in the position that courts find them. But the standards that govern whether to impose this stern remedy do not place third-party harm at the forefront of the analysis. Consequently, the current framework can underdeter harmful contracts and overdeter contracts that may be harmless. These effects can be …