Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal sentences (2)
- Prisoners (2)
- 'ticking-bomb' (1)
- Apprendi (1)
- Blakely (1)
-
- Booker (1)
- Brandon L. Garrett (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Chapman test (1)
- Convicting the innocent (1)
- Criminal justice policies (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Death penalty appeals (1)
- Empirical analysis (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Faith-based units (1)
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1)
- Garrett Study (1)
- Guilt-based harmless error rules (1)
- Guilty plea (1)
- Innocence (1)
- Innocent defendants (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Juries (1)
- Justice system (1)
- Legal fiction (1)
- Maximum sentences (1)
- National security (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Fact-Finding At Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas
Judicial Fact-Finding At Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, Blakely v. Washington, and United States v. Booker to limit judges' ability to find facts at sentencing. Paradoxically, the much-criticized Federal Sentencing Guidelines have survived; a line of cases that began as an effort to restore juries' role has turned into a guarantor of judicial discretion; and the doctrine has quickly moved far from its Sixth Amendment roots to a policy balancing test. The Court could instead have pursued a different, more fruitful path. The Court did not have to force sentencing factors into …
Exacerbating Injustice, Stephanos Bibas
Exacerbating Injustice, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
This brief essay responds to Josh Bowers' argument that criminal procedure should openly allow innocent defendants to plead guilty as a legal fiction. Though most scholars emphasize the few but salient serious felony cases, Bowers is right to refocus attention on misdemeanors and violations, which are far more numerous. And though the phrase wrongful convictions conjures up images of punishing upstanding citizens, Bowers is also right to emphasize that recidivists are far more likely to suffer wrongful suspicion and conviction. Bowers' mistake is to treat the criminal justice system as simply a means of satisfying defendants' preferences and choices. This …
Death And Harmless Error: A Rhetorical Response To Judging Innocence, Colin Starger
Death And Harmless Error: A Rhetorical Response To Judging Innocence, Colin Starger
All Faculty Scholarship
Professor Garrett’s impressive empirical analysis of the first 200 post conviction DNA exonerations in the United States (“Garrett Study”) has the potential to affect contemporary debates surrounding our nation’s criminal justice system. This Response explores this potential by harnessing the Study’s data in support of arguments for and against a contested doctrinal proposition — that guilt-based harmless error rules should never apply in death penalty appeals. My analysis starts with the premise that the Study’s real world impact will necessarily depend on how jurists, politicians, and scholars extrapolate the explanatory power of the data beyond the 200 cases themselves. While …
Torture, Truth Serum, And Ticking Bombs: Toward A Pragmatic Perspective Of Coercive Interrogation, Kenneth Lasson
Torture, Truth Serum, And Ticking Bombs: Toward A Pragmatic Perspective Of Coercive Interrogation, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
The 'War on Terror' has prompted a great deal of discussion about the use of torture as a means of extracting information from those suspected of having perpetrated past acts of violence or planning future ones. Despite the years that have passed since the attacks of September 11, 2001, for both citizens and government officials there is still a strong tension between the competing emotions of anger, revenge, and desperation; it seems increasingly difficult to adhere to international norms governing a nation's moral and legal obligations to protect its citizens from grave danger while continuing to support individual freedoms. Among …
'The Devil Is In The Details': A Continued Dissection Of The Constitutionality Of Faith-Based Prison Units, Lynn S. Branham
'The Devil Is In The Details': A Continued Dissection Of The Constitutionality Of Faith-Based Prison Units, Lynn S. Branham
All Faculty Scholarship
Faith-based prison units can afford prisoners who choose to be housed in them the concentrated and sustained spiritual nourishment that they believe they need to grow spiritually or in other ways. But critics claim that these units abridge the Establishment Clause. This Article debunks two of the arguments most frequently asserted against the constitutionality of faith-based units. The first is that prisoners cannot exercise a "true private choice" in the "inherently coercive" environment of a prison to live in such a unit. But court decisions confirm that confinement does not abnegate the voluntariness of other decisions made by prisoners, such …
Torture And The Biopolitics Of Race, Dorothy E. Roberts
Torture And The Biopolitics Of Race, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Thoroughly Modern: Sir James Fitzjames Stephen On Criminal Responsibility, Stephen J. Morse
Thoroughly Modern: Sir James Fitzjames Stephen On Criminal Responsibility, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Closing Keynote: A Comment On Mass Incarceration In The United States, David Rudovsky
A Closing Keynote: A Comment On Mass Incarceration In The United States, David Rudovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constructing A Criminal Justice System Free Of Racial Bias: An Abolitionist Framework, Dorothy E. Roberts
Constructing A Criminal Justice System Free Of Racial Bias: An Abolitionist Framework, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.