Law Commons^™

The St. Thomas Effect: Law School Mission And The Formation Of Professional Identity, Jennifer Wright

Jennifer Wright

The legal profession has long been criticized for declining standards of professionalism. Recent studies have pointed to the crucial role of legal education in forming the professional identity of lawyers. Law schools must take seriously their duty to intentionally and thoughtfully shape their students’ sense of what it means to be a lawyer and of how their professional identities will align and coexist with their other personal and ethical commitments. In this article, I examine a case study of one law school, the University of St. Thomas School of Law, whose self-proclaimed raison d’etre is to produce a “different kind …

Hanging In A Balance: Freedom Of Expression And Religion, Puja Kapai, Anne Sy Cheung

Puja Kapai

When the liberty to freely express oneself is at odds with another’s right to freedom of religion, we are confronted with the classic dilemma of choosing between two equally fundamental, constitutionally and internationally protected rights. The contours of the said two rights however, are far from clear. Whilst freedom of expression is not an absolute right, its limits are controversial. Equally, while it is undisputed that freedom of religion is an internationally protected human right enshrined in various international instruments, there is no comprehensive international treaty which addresses as its subject the content and extent of the right of freedom …

Constitution By Compromise, Howard Schweber, Amnon Cavari

Howard Schweber

The question of empowering the court and the limits of constitutional protection are at the heart of the debate over constitutional design in Israel. Lacking a comprehensive written constitution, Israel nonetheless has a set of basic laws which encompass many of the functions of a constitutional text making it a near-complete constitution. Nonetheless, there continues to be considerable support for the idea of a single, formally adopted constitutional text. Recently, several proposals have been brought to the forefront of political discussions through the actions of various interest groups outside the government, and energized and committed efforts by government officials and …

The Continuing Threshold Test For Free Exercise Claims, Andy G. Olree

Andy G Olree

When a claimant challenges some governmental law or action under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, courts have long required the claimant to make out a prima facie case that the government has burdened the exercise of the claimant’s sincerely held religious beliefs. This requirement has been referred to as the threshold test for free exercise claims, since claimants must make this showing as a threshold matter before courts will proceed to evaluate the burden and the governmental interest at stake under some standard of scrutiny. This Article argues that, while the U.S. Supreme Court has recently adopted …

Suicide, Law And Morality, Edward Rubin

Edward Rubin

Dear Editors,

The enclosed article argues that blanket prohibitions against assisted suicide are unconstitutional. This position has been advanced by a number of commentators, who have generally based their argument on the so-called right to die. From a constitutional perspective, however, this right can only be grounded on either substantive due process or the right of privacy, that is, the penumbra of the first eight amendments. While the argument isn’t necessarily wrong, it suffers from its reliance on aggressive and controversial interpretations of the constitutional text.

The position this article advances is that prohibitions against assisted suicide violate the First …

When Churches Divide: On Neutrality, Deference, And Unpredictability, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Predictions that the Anglican Communion would be torn asunder have proven false, at least for now. Nonetheless, continuing disagreements about whether Bishop Gene Robinson should be a bishop and about whether same-sex unions should be recognized provide an ever-present reason for a possible break within that Communion. Were there such a break, there might well be numerous suits regarding the ownership of various properties.

Historically, churches have split off from their denominational affiliations for a whole host of reasons including disagreements over property ownership, church leadership, or member equality. When such divisions take place, the ownership of particular buildings or …

The Political Origins Of Secular Public Education: The New York City School Controversy, 1840-1842, Ian C. Bartrum

Ian C Bartrum

THE ORIGINS OF SECULAR PUBLIC EDUCATION: THE NEW YORK SCHOOL CONTROVERSY, 1840-1842 As the title suggests, this article explores the historical origins of secular public education, with a particular focus on the controversy surrounding the Catholic petitions for school funding in nineteenth-century New York City. The article first examines the development of Protestant nonsectarian common schools in the northeast, then turns to the New York controversy in detail, and finally explores that controversy’s legacy in state constitutions and the Supreme Court. It is particularly concerned with two ideas generated in New York: (1) Bishop John Hughes’ objection to nonsectarianism as …

The Kosovo Crisis: A Dostoievskian Dialogue On International Law, Statecraft, And Soulcraft, Robert J. Delahunty

Robert J. Delahunty

No abstract provided.

The Coercion Test: On Prayer, Offense, And Doctrinal Inculcation, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Several different tests have been proposed to determine whether a state practice violates the Establishment Clause, including the Lemon test, the Endorsement test, and the Coercion test. While no test yet commands the consistent support of members of the Court, it is clear that several members of the Court favor some version of the Coercion test. Interpretation and evaluation of that test are rather difficult, however, because Court members differ greatly both about what kind of coercion triggers the relevant protections and about what the test is designed to prevent. The great disparity in views both about the reach and …

The Congressional Chaplaincies, Christopher C. Lund

Christopher C Lund

Twenty five years ago, in Marsh v. Chambers, the Supreme Court considered the congressional chaplaincies, and concluded that they were not “an ‘establishment’ of religion or a step toward establishment,” but instead were “simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country.” That latter phrase has been repeated hundreds of times in cases and law review articles; it suggests that the chaplaincies are uninteresting and uncontroversial and that they have been so throughout our history.

The Court in Marsh looked only briefly at the history of the chaplaincies. But a deeper look at that history …

"The Servant Of Two Masters": The Influence Of Church/State Paradigms On The Rise And Fall Of Clergy Disqualification Clauses In The United Kingdom And United States, Hunter M. Abell

Hunter M Abell

The role of clergy in American politics grows more hotly debated with each passing election cycle. This submission examines the competing loyalties a politically active member of the clergy experiences as he or she attempts to simultaneously serve their faith and the body politic. In doing so, it reviews the practice of clergy disqualification which prohibited clergy from serving in a representative body. It examines the rich and intriguing history the practice enjoyed in both the United States and United Kingdom and offers the theory that the use of clergy disqualification in both countries arose out of each country’s unique, …

The Protection And Alienation Of Religious Minorities: On The Evolution Of The Endorsement Test, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

The Endorsement test is one of the tests currently used by the United States Supreme Court to determine whether a particular state practice implicating religion passes constitutional muster and has been described as the test to make that determination. While commentators have noted that the current test is difficult for lower courts to apply and is likely to result in relevantly similar cases being decided dissimilarly, too little attention has been paid to the ways that the test itself has evolved. The Court’s more recent applications of the test have conveyed a message far different from the one previously communicated, …

Beware The "One-Flesh Union": Conservatives Coalesce In Opposition To Same-Sex Marriage, William B. Turner

William B Turner

This article explores the notion of "one-flesh union" as the definitional basis for marriage according to Christian conservatives, and as an indication of the ways in which various types of Christian conservatives are overcoming their historical animosity to unite in opposition to same-sex marriage. The phrase, "one-flesh union," comes directly from the Biblical book of Genesis.

Religion In The Schools, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

This Article traces the development of modern Establishment Clause jurisprudence with respect to religion in the public schools, noting how the Court’s analyses and justifications have changed over time, protestations to the contrary notwithstanding. The Article examines how the logic of the Court’s current approach would permit practices long thought to violate Establishment Clause guarantees, concluding that the current approach is radically misconceived as a matter of both constitutional law and good public policy.

The Place Of Storytelling In Legal Reasoning: Abraham Joshua Heschel’S Torah Min Hashamayim, Stefan H. Krieger

Stefan H Krieger

This article reads the teachings of two rabbis from the Second Century through the lenses of cognitive science on legal thinking and shows the relationship of their narratives and legal opinions. Cognitive scientists posit that both logical and narrative thinking are essential modes of cognitive functioning. The stories and legal decisions of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Ishmael, as described by Abraham Joshua Heschel in his masterpiece, Torah Min Hashamayim (Heavenly Torah) support these insights. Both rabbis lived in a critical period in Jewish history. The Temple, the central focus of the people’s connection with God, had been destroyed; large numbers …

The Devil Is In The Details: Policing The Implementation Of The Military Chaplaincy, Liam J. Montgomery

Liam J Montgomery

While a court has validated the military chaplaincy as not violating the First Amendment, no court has properly scrutinized the implementation of the chaplaincy. Recent events illustrate that the military is not implementing this clear (and yet necessary and proper) establishment of religion in the most constitutionally permissible manner. By requiring prospective chaplains to obtain and retain the endorsement of an approved ecclesiastical endorsing agency, the military raises both serious Establishment and Free Exercise issues. This paper explores the constitutional implications of the chaplain endorsement system, including an examination of the history of the chaplaincy and the difficult roles that …

Chaos, Law, And God: The Religious Meanings Of Homosexuality, Jay Michaelson

Jay Michaelson

What is the meaning of gay rights in contemporary religious-political discourse? Though some explain homosexuality's disproportionate prominence in terms of homophobia, "church and state," or traditional values versus progressive ones, this article suggests that the legal regulation of sexuality has a far deeper, and more specific, religious meaning: sexuality is a primary site in which religious law is engendered, where the lawfulness of religion meets the chaos beyond it. Arguments about gay rights, same-sex marriage, and related issues are not merely arguments informed by religious values; they are arguments about the nature of religion itself. The article begins by providing …

Does The Constitutional Norm Of Separation Of Church And State Justify The Denial Of Tax Exemption To Churches That Engage In Partisan Political Speech?, Johnny Buckles

Johnny Buckles

The Internal Revenue Service is aggressively investigating churches for their alleged political endorsements of candidates in the 2008 presidential election. At issue is whether these churches have violated section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes a ban on electioneering by churches and other charities as a condition of maintaining federal income tax exemption. The ban has been justified as necessary to ensure the proper separation of church and state. This article critically analyzes this rationale for the ban. Four major variants of the separationist argument are articulated and thoroughly analyzed in the context of relevant Supreme Court case …

Mis-Under-Standing Freedom From Religion: Two Cents On Madison's Three Pence, Kyle Duncan

Kyle Duncan

Forty years ago in Flast v. Cohen, the Supreme Court created, for Establishment Clause cases only, a dramatic exception to a bedrock principle of standing doctrine, based on one catchy phrase from a famous historical document—James Madison’s 1785 Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments. The Court has been notoriously bad at Establishment Clause history, but Flast seemed to push the envelope. Yet neither the Court nor commentators seemed to question Flast’s historical credentials over the last four decades. Recently, the Supreme Court took up the standing question again in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. Unhappily, the justices’ various …

Shari'ah's Black Box: Civil Liability And Criminal Exposure Surrounding Shari'ah-Compliant Finance, David Yerushalmi

David Yerushalmi

This article examines the multitude of legal issues - both criminal and civil - that Shari'ah-compliant finance (SCF) presents to U.S. financial institutions and their professional advisers. In short, SCF is the practice of investing in conformity with Islamic law (Shari'ah). Such investment appears at first glance innocuous. With only a modicum of probing, however, SCF turns out to be a black box, where the financial industry and their legal professionals have hidden a doctrine at war with the West and have ignored the dangers and risks posed by Shari'ah authorities who determine the rules and principles of this industry. …

Reinterpretations Of St. Paul's Concept Of Law, Tawia B. Ansah

Tawia B Ansah

The article is at the intersection of law, philosophy, and theology. I examine the work of Giorgio Agamben and Alain Badiou on Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Both approach Pauline law formalistically, but with very different ideas about what law is. Whereas Agamben sees continuities, Badiou sees breaks and ruptures, between law and ideas traditionally extrinsic to the realm of the juridical (grace, faith, love, etc.). But both apprehend a political significance of Paul to juridical thought within late modernity (postmodern and post-secular). I analyze their work, therefore, for its relevance to legal theory.

State Funding Of Devotional Studies: A Failed Jurisprudence That Has Lost Its Moorings, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

The Court’s attitude toward the public funding of devotional studies can best be described as ambivalent. Not long ago, devotional studies were viewed as one of the few kinds of study that the state clearly could not fund. Then, the Court did an about-face, implying that public funding of devotional studies does not violate constitutional guarantees, because that kind of study cannot be distinguished for constitutional purposes from other kinds of permissibly funded areas of study. Still more recently, the Court has changed course yet again, suggesting that states may but need not refuse to fund such studies, reverting to …

Death By A Thousand Cuts: The Illusory Safeguards Against Funding Pervasively Sectarian Institutions Of Higher Learning, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Illusory Safeguards against Funding Pervasively Sectarian Institutions of Higher Learning

Tilton v. Richardson, Hunt v. McNair, and Roemer v. Board of Public Works are often thought to offer a coherent view of the Establishment Clause limitations on funding religiously affiliated institutions of higher learning. But the decisions themselves offer inconsistent analyses of Establishment Clause limitations and, further, were the analyses in these cases applied more generally, Establishment Clause guarantees would be even less robust than they are currently thought to be.

The difficulties for the Court in offering a coherent approach to public funding …

Repudiating Everson: On Buses, Books, And Teaching Articles Of Faith, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Ever since deciding Everson v. Board of Education, the Court has wrestled with the proper way to characterize the limitations imposed on the states by the Establishment Clause. Many of the cases have involved the extent to which the state can give aid to the parents of children attending primary and secondary sectarian schools. The Court’s understanding of the limits on this kind of aid has changed markedly over the past sixty years, having first involved an analysis of the degree to which the state would be aiding religious teaching and then having changed to an analysis of whether the …

The Religious Rights Of Incarcerated Persons, Robert J. D'Agostino

Robert J D'Agostino

No abstract provided.

Chapter 03: Basic Concepts, Wolfgang Fikentscher

Wolfgang Fikentscher

Inclusive online updates jan10. Dealing with basic concepts of legal anthropology in Chapter 3, the presently much discussed (and practically important, see Chapter 13 V.1.), a focus is on the issue of ethnicity and cultural identity. Furthermore, Chapter 3 offers a freshly organized presentation of what may be called the issue of civilizational stages, in preparation of Chapter 9 where correlations between organizational, economical, religious and thought-modal traits are discussed. In Chapter 3, definitorial and functional aspects of basic concepts of anthropology are separated. For example, big man society, lineage, ramage, and clan structures are presented as such, and not …

Book Review: Michael J. Perry, Toward A Theory Of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts (2007), Mark C. Modak-Truran

Mark C Modak-Truran

This book review analyzes Michael J. Perry's most recent book Toward a Theory of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts. Perry's book brings together two previously separate aspects of his thoughtful and pioneering scholarship dealing with the proper relation of morality (especially religious morality) to law and human rights and the role of courts in protecting human rights. Perry's argument concentrates on three related issues: whether the morality of human rights has a religious or secular ground or both, the relation between the morality of human rights and the law of human rights, and the proper role of courts in protecting …

Introduction: Symposium On Religion, Religious Pluralism, And The Rule Of Law, Mark C. Modak-Truran

Mark C Modak-Truran

The articles and essays in this Symposium on Religion, Religious Pluralism, and the Rule of Law were presented for a Section on Law and Religion panel at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools. The Symposium aims to move the debate about the relationship between law and religion beyond conflicts between secularists and religionists by focusing attention on presuppositions about religion, religious pluralism, and the rule of law. Focusing on these presuppositions helps get beyond the tendency of most legal scholars, judges, and lawyers to think through the law rather than about the law. The articles …

Beyond Theocracy And Secularism (Part I): Toward A New Paradigm For Law And Religion, Mark C. Modak-Truran

Mark C Modak-Truran

The continued vitality of religion has motivated many scholars in sociology, anthropology, political theory, international relations, and philosophy to revisit their assumptions about how religion relates to their disciplines. Despite this robust re-examination in other disciplines, two outmoded paradigms about the relationship between law and religion —theocracy (pre-modern) and secularism (modern)—continue to dominate legal theory. Under the modern paradigm, the secularization of law—that the law is or should be independent of any religious foundation or values—arguably constitutes the most widely-held but least-examined assumption in contemporary legal theory. My thesis is that two quandaries or crises for legal theory—legal indeterminacy and …

You Say You Want A Revolution: Interpretive Communities And The Origins Of Islamic Finance, Haider Ala Hamoudi

Haider Ala Hamoudi

Despite its currently conservative character, the modern practice of Islamic finance lies on a bedrock of social, cultural and economic revolution. Examination of these revolutionary origins and their attendant jurisprudential implications reveal much about the schizophrenia plaguing Islamic finance today, of a largely formalist practice repeating the functional aims of the early revolutionaries and falsely understood by substantial portions of the wider Muslim community to be achieving such aims. Though the revolution has not come to pass, some of the comparatively radical functional approaches conceived in the context of the anticipated upheaval, and in particular those of the Iraqi Shi'i …