Law Commons^™

Electronic Commerce And Legal Protection For Consumers In Spain, Juan-Antonio Mondejar-Jimenez, Mª Angeles Zurilla-Cariñana, Jose Mondejar-Jimenez

Juan-Antonio Mondejar-Jimenez

Electronic commerce is becoming increasingly common at international level. It is defined as “doing business electronically across the extended enterprise”, which includes all forms of business, administrative transactions and information exchanges in which any type of information or communication technology is used. It has also been defined as “the form of commerce that by using the services and links provided in electronic documents in the Internet, allows the customer to query, select and purchase a distributor's offer using a device that is connected to the Internet, in real time and at any time or place”. In Spain, the Information Society …

How Mandatory Are Mandatory Minimums? How Judges Can Avoid Imposing Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Nathan A. Greenblatt

Nathan A Greenblatt

Mandatory minimum sentences are anathema to judges due to, it is commonly said, judges’ “utter lack of power to do anything for the exceptional defendants that move them.” In the case of Weldon Angelos, for example, U.S. District Judge Paul Cassell lamented that sentencing Mr. Angelos to 55 years in prison “is unjust, cruel, and even irrational. [The court] reluctantly concludes that it has no choice.” The Judicial Conference has consistently opposed mandatory minimum sentences for more than 50 years, because it, too, has concluded that mandatory sentences give judges no choice in sentencing. Indeed, the U.S. Sentencing Commission recently …

Original Public Understanding Of The Fourteenth Amendment As Reflected In The Print Media Of 1866-1868, David T. Hardy

David T. Hardy

The controversy between 14th Amendment total incorporation under the privileges or immunities clause, and selective incorporation under its due process clause, has remained quiescent in recent years. Now, three cases pending in the lower Federal courts are making bids to revive the controversy that once generated a feud between Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter.

In the last Term, a majority of the Supreme Court accepted a variant of original public meaning as the key to ascertaining constitutional meaning; the focus of this interpretative methodology is not upon Congressional understanding in proposing a constitutional provision, but upon the likely understanding of …

The Mid-Century Civil Rights Movement: How America Was Changed Forever, Dylan Berg

Dylan Berg

The Mid-Century Civil Rights Movement: How America Was Changed Forever The Civil Rights Movement fought for African-American rights in America in the early 1900’s, and is still in some instances being fought today. However, in almost a century of fighting, the most dynamic and successful era of the Civil Rights Movement was the Mid-Century era. This article focuses on the Mid-Century moral and legislative victories, and the men who helped accomplish them. It includes Brown v. The Board of Education and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It talks of two of the greatest rabble rousing orators ever to be …

The Original Understanding Of The Political Status Of Indian Tribes, Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

This Article will demonstrate that virtually all elements of Indian affairs can be traced to the decision of the United States to recognize Indian tribes as political entities and to make Indian law and policy based on the political status of Indian tribes. Indian law is often assumed to be race law. As a result, observers tend to try to force Indian law into the constitutional race law paradigm. Justice Blackmun’s footnote 24 in Morton v. Mancari – describing federal legislation and rules relating to Indian tribes as a political classification – hit upon the proper understanding of Indian law. …

Modern Disparities In Legal Education: Emancipation From Racial Neutrality, David Mears

David Mears

Abstract

Wealth, leadership and political power within any democratic society requires the highest caliber of a quality legal education. The Black experience is not necessarily a unique one within legal education but rather an excellent example of either poor to substandard quality disseminated unequally among racial and socioeconomic stereotypes based upon expected outcomes of probable success or failure. It is often said, “Speak and so it will happen” – many within the halls of academia work hard to openly predict failure yet seemingly do very little to foster success internally within the academic procedures and processes based on the customer …

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One V. Mukasey: The Supreme Court's Opportunity To Examine And Clarify The Law Surrounding Section 5 Of The Voting Rights Act, Matthew C. Dahl

Matthew C. Dahl

No abstract provided.

People As Crops, Evelyn L. Wilson

Evelyn L. Wilson

In 1807, Congress passed a law prohibiting the importation of slaves. The South began to feel the effect of labor shortages and prices escalated. To meet this demand, farmers in the upper south states, especially Virginia, began the systematic breeding of slaves for sale to the southwest. Through the use of statements from Virginia statesmen and from some of Virginia’s former slaves, my paper discusses slave breeding, first as a consequence of slavery, as an added benefit to the labor obtained from the slave.

My father was born in Virginia, as was his father, as was his father, as was …

A Proposal For Establishing Specialized Federal And State "Takings Courts", John Martinez

John Martinez

A Proposal for Establishing

Specialized Federal and State "Takings Courts"

By John Martinez, Professor of Law

S.J. Quinney College of Law

at the University of Utah

ABSTRACT

Takings doctrine is a mess. This article proposes that we just accept that -- and establish specialized federal and state "takings courts" for adjudicating takings claims.

In 1978 the United States Supreme Court confessed that takings analysis is hopelessly ad hoc. And in 2005, the Court abrogated a test for takings which it had followed for 25 years. Indeed, some scholars have even resigned themselves to embracing vagueness as a virtue in takings …

"Throwing Away The Key: An Examination Of New York's Sex Offender Civil Commitment Statute", Joseph E. Fahey

Joseph E Fahey

No abstract provided.

A Decade Later: The Attack Against Critical Racetheory In Defense Of Reason, Raul Vargas

raul vargas

This article adresses, in detail, the savage attack against Critical Race Theory initiated by the release of Farber and Sherry's "Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law" in 1997-98. In particular, focus is on its decade-long ramifications and the utter absence of intelectual virtues this attack introduced. Raul Vargas DePaul University College of Law, J.D. University of Chicago, Committe on the Humanities/Social Thought, M.A. Syracuse University, Department of Philosophy, Ph.D. Candidate

Crowning The New King: The Statutory Arbitrator And The Demise Of Judicial Review, Michael H. Leroy

Michael H LeRoy

Judicial review of arbitration awards is highly deferential, but when does it become rubber stamping? Using original data, I find that federal courts vacated only 4.3 percent of 162 disputed awards. Nearly the same result was observed for a sub-sample of 44 employment discrimination awards under Title VII. By comparison, federal appeals courts in 2006 reversed 12.9 percent of 5,917 rulings made by civil court judges on the merits of legal claims.

Why are the rulings of Article III judges scrutinized more than the awards of citizen-arbitrators? What does this mean when companies can avoid Article III court rulings by …

Fairness And The Distribution Of Primary Goods, Nathan W. Dean

Nathan W. Dean

I consider whether any one of the schemes of distributive justice envisioned by John Rawls, Robert Nozick, or G.A. Cohen is truly fair. By means of a close and critical reading of their work on distributive justice, I conclude that their schemes of distributive justice in some instances fail to correct for elements of unfairness and at other times introduce unfairness in the furtherance of other largely unacknowledged ends. More specifically, I (1) describe the ways in which Rawls, Nozick, and Cohen fail to show us what a fair scheme of distributive justice would look like, (2) sketch what I …

United States V. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study In Law And Racial Conflict, Debora L. Threedy

Debora L. Threedy

This paper is a case study of United States v. Hatahley, a leading case in the Remedies canon, using the methodology of “legal archaeology” to reconstruct the historical, social and economic context of the litigation. In 1953, a group of individual Navajos brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act for the destruction of over a hundred horses and burros. The first section of the paper presents two contrasting narratives for the case. The first relates what we know about the case from the reported opinions, while the second locates the litigated case within the larger social context by examining …

A Fighting Chance: An Analysis Of The Role Of Social Science Evidence In Higher Education Affirmative Action And K-12 Voluntary Desegregation Cases, Crystal Gafford Muhammad

Crystal Gafford Muhammad

The present inquiry focuses on the role of social science evidence contemporarily, using observations from judicial opinions in race conscious admissions cases. Using a set of judicial opinions from K-12 voluntary desegregation and higher education affirmative action in admissions, I use legal and statistical analysis to argue that social science data presented into evidence is of limited effect. In fact, I find judicial political philosophy is the greatest predictor of opinions in this area of law. However, the question is not whether social science evidence is influential or even persuasive, but whether it is useful in politically contentious cases. It …

Resisting Guantanamo: Rights At The Brink Of Dehumanization, Muneer I. Ahmad

Muneer I Ahmad

The Supreme Court’s June 2008 decision in Boumediene v. Bush, granting constitutional habeas corpus rights to terrorist suspects at Guantánamo Bay, appeared to usher in a rights moment in which legal advocacy achieved transformative results. But the history of rights-based litigation at Guantánamo suggests that such victories often are fleeting, with court pronouncements failing to produce the meaningful change—freedom of prisoners, closure of Guantánamo—expected of such landmark decisions. This reflects not simply a failure of the courts, but a limitation of rights in the face of extreme state violence. This Article argues that the work of rights—and of lawyers—at Guantánamo …

Abandon All Hope Ye That Enter: Title Vi, Equal Protection, And The Divine Comedy Of Environmental Justice, Carlton Waterhouse

Carlton Waterhouse

Dante’s Alighieri’s epic poem the Divine Comedy begins with the journey of the author and his guide Virgil down through the depths of Hell. Early in their trek, Dante finds the phrase “Abandon All Hope Ye That Enter” inscribed above the gates of Hell. Drawing on this classic work, the article analogizes Dante’s passage through Hell with the experience of communities relying on civil rights law to address the disparate racial effects of environmental decisions. The article begins with an examination of the first administrative complaint filed with the Environmental Protection Agency alleging racial discrimination in environmental permitting in 1992 …

United States V. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study Of Law And Racial Conflict, Debora L. Threedy

Debora L. Threedy

This paper is a case study of United States v. Hatahley, a leading case in the Remedies canon, using the methodology of “legal archaeology” to reconstruct the historical, social and economic context of the litigation. In 1953, a group of individual Navajos brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act for the destruction of over a hundred horses and burros. The first section of the paper presents two contrasting narratives for the case. The first relates what we know about the case from the reported opinions, while the second locates the litigated case within the larger social context by examining …

When Churches Divide: On Neutrality, Deference, And Unpredictability, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Predictions that the Anglican Communion would be torn asunder have proven false, at least for now. Nonetheless, continuing disagreements about whether Bishop Gene Robinson should be a bishop and about whether same-sex unions should be recognized provide an ever-present reason for a possible break within that Communion. Were there such a break, there might well be numerous suits regarding the ownership of various properties.

Historically, churches have split off from their denominational affiliations for a whole host of reasons including disagreements over property ownership, church leadership, or member equality. When such divisions take place, the ownership of particular buildings or …

Voter Turnout: From Cost To Cooperation, Jason B. Marisam

Jason B Marisam

Political scientists have repeatedly concluded that state efforts to increase voter turnout will continue to flounder, so long as those efforts remain focused on lowering the already low cost of voting. Accordingly, this Article argues that future efforts to achieve consistently higher and widespread turnout among all demographics must consider other determinants of voter behavior. The primary goal of the Article is to craft a framework based on a thorough understanding of voter motivation and behavior that helps conceptualize and analyze public efforts to increase voter turnout. The framework fills a gap in the literature by drawing from a range …

The New Boys: Women With Disabilities And The Legal Profession, Carrie G. Basas

Carrie G Basas

This essay fuses the fields of law, feminist theory, and cultural studies to examine the status of women attorneys with disabilities. It is the first study of its kind in the United States. The author conducted an empirical, qualitative, and ethnographic study of women attorneys with disabilities in the United States. Thirty-eight attorneys participated and their narratives form the basis for critical analysis of disability animus and discrimination in the legal profession. The results show an alarming trend toward disabled women attorneys self-accommodating in the workplace, rather than enforcing their employment rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Relying on …

The Irresistible Force, Bruce A. Antkowiak

Bruce A Antkowiak

This article calls for the reformation of the doctrine that permits a legislature to assign to a defendant the burden of proving an issue in a criminal case to avoid conviction. It argues that such a doctrine violates the basic norms of the Constitution and the “jury right” that is at its core. That right includes the institution of the jury trial, the presumption of innocence and the burden on the government to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. It is violated by such a burden assignment just as the Apprendi line of cases holds that the shifting of …

Public Awareness Of Human Rights: Distortions In The Mass Media, Eric Heinze, Rosa Freedman

Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London

This article examines distortions of human rights reporting in the mass media. We examine human rights coverage in four of the most influential newspapers, two from the US and two from the UK. The US papers are The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. The British papers are The Financial Times and The Guardian.

Most current scholarship on international human rights draws its information from specialized sources, such as the published reports of intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations. Wholly absent has been any systematic study of the mass media. To date, no one has examined the dominant media agencies, …

Overreaction Then (Korematsu) And Now (The Detainee Cases), Fritz Snyder, Geri Fox

Geri Fox

Overreacting to tragic events leads to even more tragedy. When it is the government which overreacts, individual constitutional rights can vanish. The fear, anger, and patriotism engendered during a war or by a terrorist attack can Aundermine the capacity of individuals and institutions to make clearheaded judgments about risk, fairness, and danger .... Reason and logic vanish. It is difficult to make calm, balanced decisions in a state of personal anxiety, outrage, or passion. Overreaction occurs, and individual rights disappear. Even the United States Supreme Court can get swept away. This article uses the Korematsu case as a case study …

Good Ole’ Boys Apply Only: How The Ncaa Discriminates Against Minorities & Women In Collegiate Coaching, Nathan Berkeley

Nathan Berkeley

This note discusses the early-2008 NCAA Rule mandating that every NCAA Division I football team interview at least one minority head coach candidate when a vacancy evolves. I explore the possible reasons for the racial inequities and the unique circumstances in trying to implement an affirmative action program for unique high level positions. I argue that the NCAA Rule, as it stands now, is ineffective because there is currently no enforcement mechanism and that the Rule should be expanded to include other sports and women.

Good Ole’ Boys Apply Only: How The Ncaa Discriminates Against Minorities & Women In Collegiate Coaching, Nathan Berkeley

Nathan Berkeley

This note discusses the early-2008 NCAA Rule mandating that every NCAA Division I football team interview at least one minority head coach candidate when a vacancy evolves. I explore the possible reasons for the racial inequities and the unique circumstances in trying to implement an affirmative action program for unique high level positions. I argue that the NCAA Rule, as it stands now, is ineffective because there is currently no enforcement mechanism and that the Rule should be expanded to include other sports and women.

The Partially Prudential Doctrine Of Mootness, Matthew I. Hall

Matthew I Hall

The conventional understanding of mootness doctrine is that it operates as a mandatory bar to federal court jurisdiction, derived from the “cases or controversies” clause of the United States Constitution, Article III. In two crucial respects, however, this Constitutional model—which was first adopted by the Supreme Court less than 45 years ago—fails to account for the manner in which courts actually address contentions of mootness. First, the commonly-applied exceptions to the mootness bar are not derived from the “cases or controversies” clause and cannot be reconciled with the Constitutional account of mootness. Second, courts regularly consider and resolve mootness issues …

Good Ole’ Boys Apply Only: How The Ncaa Discriminates Against Minorities & Women In Collegiate Coaching, Nathan Berkeley

Nathan Berkeley

This note discusses the early-2008 NCAA Rule mandating that every NCAA Division I football team interview at least one minority head coach candidate when a vacancy evolves. I explore the possible reasons for the racial inequities and the unique circumstances in trying to implement an affirmative action program for unique high level positions. I argue that the NCAA Rule, as it stands now, is ineffective because there is currently no enforcement mechanism and that the Rule should be expanded to include other sports and women.

Recognizing Marriage, William J. Rich

William Rich

Recognizing Marriage Abstract Two adults living in the United States already have the right to form enduring relationships, to cohabit, and to identify themselves as married. The path towards full social and legal recognition of marriage for individuals of the same sex, however, must still be developed and will involve multiple steps requiring careful navigation. That path begins with broadening social acceptance, including extension of employment benefits, acceptance within progressive social and religious organizations, and support for children living with same sex couples. Legal acceptance will inevitably follow these changes in society, but in a majority of states, significant road …

Good Ole’ Boys Apply Only: How The Ncaa Discriminates Against Minorities & Women In Collegiate Coaching, Nathan Berkeley

Nathan Berkeley

This note discusses the early-2008 NCAA Rule mandating that every NCAA Division I football team interview at least one minority head coach candidate when a vacancy evolves. I explore the possible reasons for the racial inequities and the unique circumstances in trying to implement an affirmative action program for unique high level positions. I argue that the NCAA Rule, as it stands now, is ineffective because there is currently no enforcement mechanism and that the Rule should be expanded to include other sports and women.