Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 27 of 27
Full-Text Articles in Law
Censorship By Media Elites Will Ultimately Threaten The Republic, Michael E. Bailey
Censorship By Media Elites Will Ultimately Threaten The Republic, Michael E. Bailey
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Deregulating The Second Republic, Andrew C. Barrett
Deregulating The Second Republic, Andrew C. Barrett
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Stanley S. Hubbard
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Stanley S. Hubbard
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fcc Plus Sixty, Larry King
Up With The Fcc: An Essay Of Esteem For The Commission On Its Sixtieth Birthday, Abner J. Mikva
Up With The Fcc: An Essay Of Esteem For The Commission On Its Sixtieth Birthday, Abner J. Mikva
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Second Chance, Newton N. Minow
Second Chance, Newton N. Minow
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act, Susan Ness
Reflections On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act, Susan Ness
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Unfinished Task Of Spectrum Policy Reform, Janice Obuchowski
The Unfinished Task Of Spectrum Policy Reform, Janice Obuchowski
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Q'S World: The Future Of Broadcast Regulation, James H. Quello
Q'S World: The Future Of Broadcast Regulation, James H. Quello
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Reinventing Fcc Adjudication, Sidney White Rhyne
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In The Battle Over Tv Violence, The Communications Act Should Be Cheered, Not Changed!, Carl R. Ramey
In The Battle Over Tv Violence, The Communications Act Should Be Cheered, Not Changed!, Carl R. Ramey
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Joel Rosenbloom
On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Communications Act Of 1934, Joel Rosenbloom
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Challenge Of Choice, Richard E. Wiley
The Challenge Of Choice, Richard E. Wiley
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Call For Collaboration, Michael J. Zpevak
A Call For Collaboration, Michael J. Zpevak
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Adrian Cronauer's "The Fairness Doctrine", Robert P. Rhodes
Commentary On Adrian Cronauer's "The Fairness Doctrine", Robert P. Rhodes
Federal Communications Law Journal
Symposium: The Transformation of Television News
The Fairness Doctrine: A Solution In Search Of A Problem, Adrian Cronauer
The Fairness Doctrine: A Solution In Search Of A Problem, Adrian Cronauer
Federal Communications Law Journal
The "Fairness Doctrine" refers to a former policy of the Federal Communications Commission wherein a broadcast station which presented one viewpoint on a controversial public issue had to afford the opposing viewpoint an opportunity to be heard. The FCC ceased to enforce the doctrine in 1987, reasoning that the doctrine actually decreased the viewpoints heard by discouraging broadcasters from covering controversial issues out of fear of censure by the FCC. The Author explores the historical development of the Fairness Doctrine and examines the flaws with the different rationales upon which the doctrine is based. The Autho concludes that today's marketplace …
Public Access: Fortifying The Electronic Soapbox, Jason Roberts
Public Access: Fortifying The Electronic Soapbox, Jason Roberts
Federal Communications Law Journal
Public access, viewed as the voice on cable for those outside the mainstream, has recently been criticized as nothing more than an unregulated channel for objectionable hate speech and indecent programming. When Congress passed the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, cable operators found themselves in the conflicting role of being liable for indecent and obscene programming on public access, while at the same time unable to exercise any editorial control over access content. All sides are now waiting to see if the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will strike down these access rules as …
Crash Test On The Information Superhighway: Constitutional Problems With The 1992 Cable Act Must-Carry Regulations, Amy Renee Wolverton
Crash Test On The Information Superhighway: Constitutional Problems With The 1992 Cable Act Must-Carry Regulations, Amy Renee Wolverton
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indecent Exposure On The Information Superhighway: Regulating Pornography On Integrated Broadband Telecommunications Networks, Angelyn M. Wright
Indecent Exposure On The Information Superhighway: Regulating Pornography On Integrated Broadband Telecommunications Networks, Angelyn M. Wright
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preemption Of Local Regulation Of Radio Antennas: A Post- Deerfield Policy For The Fcc, James R. Hobson, Jeffrey O. Moreno
Preemption Of Local Regulation Of Radio Antennas: A Post- Deerfield Policy For The Fcc, James R. Hobson, Jeffrey O. Moreno
Federal Communications Law Journal
The proliferation of novel radio delivery systems has resulted in the construction of new forms of radio antennas. Many localities have placed restrictions on the size and/or placement of these antennas, significantly hindering or blocking signal reception. Because the FCC has adopted rules that only partially preempt local regulations, municipalities have enacted laws restricting the use of home satellite dishes. A recent challenge to one such regulation resulted in a Second Circuit decision limiting the scope of FCC review of local regulations. The Authors suggest that the FCC need not take extreme measures such as total preemption or national zoning …
Abortion On The Air: Broadcasters And Indecent Political Advertising, Milagros Rivera-Sanchez, Paul H. Gates Jr.
Abortion On The Air: Broadcasters And Indecent Political Advertising, Milagros Rivera-Sanchez, Paul H. Gates Jr.
Federal Communications Law Journal
Section 315(a) of the Communications Act--the anti-censorship provision--allows for the presentation of candidates' unvarnished positions on issues important to the voting public. In the 1990s, ads centered around abortion caused a collision between the interests of political candidates and broadcasters. The Article reviews broadcasters' attempts to use the indecency provisions of the Communications Act to channel controversial political advertisements. The Authors conclude that airing potentially indecent political ads is unlikely to result in sanctions for broadcasters.
The Children's Hour Revisited: The Children's Television Act Of 1990, Diane Aden Hayes
The Children's Hour Revisited: The Children's Television Act Of 1990, Diane Aden Hayes
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Children's Television Act of 1990 was created to reduce advertising during children's programming and increase the number of educational programs for children. But by 1993 media watchers found that violations were frequent, and that what was purported to be educational television was often little more than cartoons. This Note argues that the apparent failure of the Act stems primarily from its vague standards. To correct these problems, more explicit regulations are necessary. Because new regulations can only go so far before they invade broadcasters' First Amendment rights, broadcasters and the FCC will have to compromise to create a workable …
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iv: Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels, Majorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry, Michael Sitcov
Panel Iv: Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels, Majorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry, Michael Sitcov
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And Fcc Rule Making Under The 1992 Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson
The First Amendment And Fcc Rule Making Under The 1992 Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the First Amendment implications of the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) regulations issued under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 19921 (1992 Cable Act). The 1992 Cable Act imposes numerous requirements that are beyond the scope of this Article. This Article analyzes only the FCC's exercise of rule making discretion under the 1992 Cable Act.
Additionally, it must be remembered that an under-staffed FCC was given an enormous amount of work to do within fixed time limits. Therefore, it must be expected that the rulemaking would be vulnerable to second-guessing. Nonetheless, whenever a governmental entity …