Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bills And Notes -"Massachusetts" Trust- Liability Of Trustee Under Section 20 Of The N. I. L
Bills And Notes -"Massachusetts" Trust- Liability Of Trustee Under Section 20 Of The N. I. L
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued the trustee of a realty business trust in his personal capacity on three notes signed by him as follows: "Robert J. Smith, Trustee of Fair Haven Estates." The notes were given in payment of the purchase price of certain land sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, which was secured by a purchase money mortgage. The indenture of trust under which the business was carried on, and which was recorded, provided that all persons who did business with the organization should look only to the trust funds for reimbursement, and neither the trustee nor the shareholders should be …
Bills And Notes - Bad Faith On Part Of Pledgee Taking Bonds
Bills And Notes - Bad Faith On Part Of Pledgee Taking Bonds
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, a Wisconsin firm, issued certain bearer bonds secured by a mortgage held by the T corporation, as trustee. A provision in the mortgage defining the duties of the trustee in the disposition of bonds delivered to it was incorporated into the bonds by reference. The trustee being insolvent, plaintiff bank, as pledgee of some of the bonds taken to secure personal loans to the trustee, petitioned the referee in bankruptcy for permission to sell them, claiming to be a bona fide pledgee for value. Held, since federal courts are bound to follow state decisions interpreting state statutes declaratory …
Bills And Notes - Execution Of Instruments By Agents - Liability Under N.I.L.
Bills And Notes - Execution Of Instruments By Agents - Liability Under N.I.L.
Michigan Law Review
The liability of parties on negotiable instruments executed by agents or representatives is a matter which has not been satisfactorily settled by the cases under the N.I.L., due partly to the ambiguity of the statute itself and partly to the obstinate refusal of some courts to adopt the approach of the ordinary business man. Under the law merchant the agent ran a great risk of personal liability in executing a negotiable instrument unless he was careful to spell out that he was signing for a named principal as agent only. If he merely added to his name the phrase "agent …
Banks And Banking - Incidence Of Loss Resulting From Payments By Drawee Bank Not In Accordance With Depositor's Orders
Michigan Law Review
The ordinary commercial deposit normally results in a debtor-creditor relationship between bank and depositor. It is familiar doctrine that in this situation a duty rests upon the bank to honor its creditor's properly drawn orders to the extent of the depositor's balance. Payments by the bank, ostensibly according to such orders, but which are in truth not in accordance therewith, are the bank's loss at least so far as the supposed drawer is concerned. In bookkeeping terms this means that payments by the bank not strictly in pursuance of genuine orders ordinarily cannot be charged against the account of the …
Bills And Notes - Holder In Due Course -Antecedent Obligation As Value
Bills And Notes - Holder In Due Course -Antecedent Obligation As Value
Michigan Law Review
X, entrusted with the safekeeping of negotiable bearer bonds of A and B, stole A's bonds. On A's request for his securities, X, purporting to deliver what was requested, delivered B's bonds. The wrongdoing was not discovered for over a year. B then sued A to recover the bonds. Held, B may recover, for A is not a purchaser for value. State ex rel. Sorenson v. Nebraska State Sav. Bank, (Neb. 1934) 255 N. W. 52.
Banks And Banking-Liability On Payment Of Incomplete Check
Banks And Banking-Liability On Payment Of Incomplete Check
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's agent signed a check in blank, and placed it in a safe. A thief broke into the safe, removed the check and other papers, inserted "Cash'' as the payee and $486.50 as the amount, and was paid by the drawee bank. In an action against the bank for charging plaintiff's account with this item, the court held that as between the parties, because the bank was negligent in paying the check without sufficient identification, it must bear the loss. Joseph Heimberg, Inc. v. Lincoln Nat. Bank, (N. J. L. 1934) 172 Atl. 528.