Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law

Fordham Law Review

2009

Removal

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Toward A Duty-Based Theory Of Executive Power, David M. Driesen Jan 2009

Toward A Duty-Based Theory Of Executive Power, David M. Driesen

Fordham Law Review

This article develops a duty-based theory of executive power. This theory maintains that the Constitution seeks to instill a duty in all executive branch officers to faithfully execute the law. Conversely, the Constitution’s Framers and Ratifiers did not intend to empower the President to distinctively shape the law to suit his policy preferences or those of his party. Rather, they envisioned a model of “disinterested leadership” serving rule-of-law values. Because of the Ratifiers’ and Framers’ interest in preventing abuse of executive power, the Constitution obligates executive branch officials to disobey illegal presidential directives and creates a major congressional role in …


The Immigration Representation Project: Meeting The Critical Needs Of Low-Wage And Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal, Joho Annobil Jan 2009

The Immigration Representation Project: Meeting The Critical Needs Of Low-Wage And Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal, Joho Annobil

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Securities Class Actions, Cafa And A Countrywide Crisis: A Call For Clarity And Consistency, Denise Mazzeo Jan 2009

Securities Class Actions, Cafa And A Countrywide Crisis: A Call For Clarity And Consistency, Denise Mazzeo

Fordham Law Review

The unfolding of the credit crisis raises novel issues in securities litigation. This Note explores the conflict between the nonremoval provision of the Securities Act of 1933 (’33 Act) and the removal provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), and their interplay in the context of class actions involving mortgage-backed securities. Circuits are currently split over whether or not such class actions are removable under CAFA. The Seventh Circuit and the Southern District of New York have held that class actions asserting only ’33 Act claims are removable under CAFA unless they fall within one of CAFA’s …