Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Juvenile Offenders (2)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Antidiscrimination law (1)
- Antiharassment law (1)
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Connick v. Myers (1)
- Consent theory (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Economics (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Employment Practice (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Garcetti v. Ceballos (1)
- General Law (1)
- Jungian Theory (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justification (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (1)
- Parent Management Training (1)
- Parent Training (1)
- Philosophy of law (1)
- Public employees (1)
- Racial harassment (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- Teaching and learning (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Supreme Court, by the narrowest of margins, held that allegations of police perjury made in memoranda to his superiors by Richard Ceballos, a supervisory prosecutor in the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, were unprotected by the First Amendment because “his expressions were made pursuant to his duties. . . .” The academic reaction to this holding has been harshly negative; scholars argue that the holding will prevent the public from learning of governmental misconduct that is known only to those working within the bowels of the government itself.
This article rejects the scholarly consensus …
Juvenile Transfer Laws: An Effective Deterrent To Delinquency?, Richard Redding
Juvenile Transfer Laws: An Effective Deterrent To Delinquency?, Richard Redding
Richard E. Redding
Provides an overview of research on the deterrent effects of transferring youth from juvenile to criminal courts, focusing on large-scale comprehensive OJJDP-funded studies on the effect of transfer laws on recidivism. The Bulletin reviews all of the extant research on the general and specific deterrent effects of transferring juveniles to adult criminal court.
Book Review: Juris Types, Learning Law Through Self-Understanding, Richard Redding
Book Review: Juris Types, Learning Law Through Self-Understanding, Richard Redding
Richard E. Redding
This article reviews the new book by Martha Peters and Don Peters, Juris Types: Learning Law Through Self-Understanding (2007). The book proposes that legal pedagogy and student learning strategies be guided in part by Carl Jung's Psychological Type Theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ("MBTI"). The MBTI is one of the most widely used personality tests in the world today, although the test has never been accepted in the academic community. This paper reviews the history of the development of the MBTI, and the empirical research on its validity and reliability, to explain why the test and its associated theory …
Training The Parents Of Juvenile Offenders: State Of The Art And Recommendations For Service Delivery, Richard Redding
Training The Parents Of Juvenile Offenders: State Of The Art And Recommendations For Service Delivery, Richard Redding
Richard E. Redding
Parent training is consistently highlighted as one of the most effective means of preventing delinquency and treating young children with conduct problems, and it has proven to be one of the most cost-effective interventions for doing so. There is, however, far less evidence supporting the efficacy of parent-training programs with adolescents and juvenile offenders. Nonetheless, it still seems to be one of the more promising methods for treating the behavior problems of adolescent delinquents, especially when used in conjunction with other carefully selected program components. We begin with an overview of parent training, highlighting the key components of successful programs. …
Graduated Consent Theory, Explained And Applied, Tom W. Bell
Graduated Consent Theory, Explained And Applied, Tom W. Bell
Tom W. Bell
We often speak of consent in binary terms, boiling it down to "yes" or "no." In practice, however, consent varies by degrees. We tend to afford expressly consensual transactions more respect than transactions backed by only implied consent, for instance, which we in turn regard as more meaningful than transactions justified by merely hypothetical consent. A mirror of that ordinal ranking appears in our judgments about unconsensual transactions. This article reviews how a wide range of authorities regard consent, discovering that they treat consent as a matter of degree and a measure of justification. By abstracting from that evidence, we …