Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Charles W. Murdock (15)
- Lawrence A. Hamermesh (7)
- Adrian J Walters (4)
- Karl T Muth (3)
- Kenneth R. Davis (3)
-
- Megan Wischmeier Shaner (3)
- Thomas E. Geu (3)
- David G. Yosifon (2)
- Hugh J. Ault (2)
- Brian JM Quinn (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Donald R. Philbin Jr. (1)
- Edward C. Lyons (1)
- Elizabeth Pollman (1)
- Mary Brigid McManamon (1)
- Nizan Geslevich Packin (1)
- Sachin R Raval (1)
- Spencer Weber Waller (1)
- Steven A. Ramirez (1)
- Tamara R. Piety (1)
- William Birdthistle (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 54
Full-Text Articles in Law
10 Things That Tick Off The Chancellors, And The Ethical Issues They Raise, Lawrence Hamermesh
10 Things That Tick Off The Chancellors, And The Ethical Issues They Raise, Lawrence Hamermesh
Lawrence A. Hamermesh
No abstract provided.
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Evolution From Liberal To Reactionary In Rule 10b-5 Actions, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Evolution From Liberal To Reactionary In Rule 10b-5 Actions, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The first trilogy was a liberal one, arguably overextending the scope of Rule 10b-5. This was followed by a conservative trilogy which put a brake on such extension, …
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Evolution From Liberal To Reactionary In Rule 10b-5 Actions, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Evolution From Liberal To Reactionary In Rule 10b-5 Actions, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The first trilogy was a liberal one, arguably overextending the scope of Rule 10b-5. This was followed by a conservative trilogy which put a brake on such extension, …
Recent Developments In Delaware Corporate Law, Lawrence Hamermesh, Faiza Saeed, Mark Gentile
Recent Developments In Delaware Corporate Law, Lawrence Hamermesh, Faiza Saeed, Mark Gentile
Lawrence A. Hamermesh
No abstract provided.
Widener Law, The Institute Of Delaware Corporate & Business Law, On-Line Symposium: Default Fiduciary Duties In Llcs And Lps, Lawrence Hamermesh
Widener Law, The Institute Of Delaware Corporate & Business Law, On-Line Symposium: Default Fiduciary Duties In Llcs And Lps, Lawrence Hamermesh
Lawrence A. Hamermesh
No abstract provided.
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Abstract Known as one of the premier business courts in the country, very few decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court have garnered as much criticism as Omnicare, Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc. In a court famously known for issuing unanimous decisions, Omnicare led to two separate dissenting opinions. In the dissents and in the years since its issuance, the majority’s decision has been faulted not only for its doctrinal shortcomings, but also for its potentially negative impact on M&A activity and its poor corporate policy implications. This has led many academics and practitioners to ask whether Omnicare was a normatively …
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Abstract Known as one of the premier business courts in the country, very few decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court have garnered as much criticism as Omnicare, Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc. Indeed, much of the criticism originated from the court itself; in a court famously known for issuing unanimous decisions, Omnicare led to two separate dissenting opinions. In the dissents and in the years since its issuance, the majority’s decision has been faulted not only for its doctrinal shortcomings, but also for its potentially negative impact on merger and acquisition activity and its poor corporate policy implications. This has …
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Revisiting And Re-Evaluating Omnicare 10 Years Later, Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Megan Wischmeier Shaner
Abstract Known as one of the premier business courts in the country, very few decisions of the Delaware Supreme Court have garnered as much criticism as Omnicare, Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc. Indeed, much of the criticism originated from the court itself; in a court famously known for issuing unanimous decisions, Omnicare led to two separate dissenting opinions. In the dissents and in the years since its issuance, the majority’s decision has been faulted not only for its doctrinal shortcomings, but also for its potentially negative impact on merger and acquisition activity and its poor corporate policy implications. This has …
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:, Charles W. Murdock
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Evolution of the Supreme Court’s Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:
Protecting Fraud at the Expense of Investors
This article traces the evolution of Supreme Court jurisprudence over the past forty years through the prism of Rule 10b-5. It uses four “trilogies” to develop this evolution. At the start of the 1970s, the liberal trend characterized by the Warren Court still prevailed. An implied private cause of action was still in favor and litigators were viewed as private attorneys general, enforcing the securities laws to further the policy of protecting investors.
The expansion of Rule 10b-5 was slowed and more judicial …
"A Necessary Cost Of Freedom"? The Incoherence Of Sorrell V. Ims, Tamara R. Piety
"A Necessary Cost Of Freedom"? The Incoherence Of Sorrell V. Ims, Tamara R. Piety
Tamara R. Piety
No abstract provided.
Limiting And Eliminating (And Establishing?) Fiduciary Duties In Delaware Business Entities, Lawrence Hamermesh
Limiting And Eliminating (And Establishing?) Fiduciary Duties In Delaware Business Entities, Lawrence Hamermesh
Lawrence A. Hamermesh
No abstract provided.
The Case Against The Dodd-Frank Act’S Living Wills: Contingency Planning Following The Financial Crisis, Nizan Geslevich Packin
The Case Against The Dodd-Frank Act’S Living Wills: Contingency Planning Following The Financial Crisis, Nizan Geslevich Packin
Nizan Geslevich Packin
The Dodd-Frank Act’s “living will” requirement mandates that systemically important financial institutions develop wide-ranging strategic analyses of their business affairs, and submit comprehensive contingency plans for reorganization or resolution of their operations to regulators. The goal is to mitigate risks to the financial stability of the US and encourage last-resort planning, which will allow for a rapid and efficient response in the event of an emergency. Beyond the general framework set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act, very little is known about living wills; no legal literature currently exists on what the concept entails, and regulators have not yet created any …
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act: What Caused The Financial Crisis And Will Dodd-Frank Succeed In Preventing Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act: What Caused The Financial Crisis And Will Dodd-Frank Succeed In Preventing Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: What Caused the Financial Crisis and Will Dodd-Frank Succeed in Preventing Future Crises?
We are still experiencing the devastating impact of the financial crisis which came to a head on September 18, 2008 when Secretary Paulson told Congressional leaders that “[u]nless you act, the financial system of this country and the world will melt down in a matter of days.”
To prevent future crises of this magnitude, last year Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. However, this year, legislation has already been introduced to repeal …
Corporate Governance And Competition Policy, Spencer Weber Waller
Corporate Governance And Competition Policy, Spencer Weber Waller
Spencer Weber Waller
Corporate Governance and Competition Policy
Spencer Weber Waller
Abstract
Corporate governance law addresses the misaligned incentives between officers and directors of publicly-owned companies and their shareholders, and how this can lead to the destruction of shareholder value. Antitrust law governs the interaction between corporations and other economic actors in the marketplace and prohibits and penalizes anticompetitive agreements, unilateral conduct which unreasonably injures competition, and mergers and acquisitions which may substantially lessen competition.
This article explores the puzzling lack of meaningful interaction between these two fields of law which govern the internal and external operations of key economic players in our …
The Financial Reform Act: Will It Succeed In Reversing The Causes Of The Subprime Crisis And Prevent Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock
The Financial Reform Act: Will It Succeed In Reversing The Causes Of The Subprime Crisis And Prevent Future Crises?, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Financial Reform Act: Will It Succeed in Reversing the Causes of the Subprime Crisis and Prevent Future Crises? By: Professor Charles W. Murdock
The current financial crisis, which could have plunged the world into a financial abyss similar to the Great Depression, is far from resolved. The financial institutions, which this article asserts caused the crisis, have returned to profitability and have paid billions of dollars in bonuses, while ordinary Americans have borne the brunt of the meltdown, with formal unemployment hanging around the 10% mark. This has caused some to comment that profits have been privatized and …
Legal Mechanization Of Corporate Social Responsibility Through Alien Tort Statute Litigation: A Response To Professor Branson With Some Supplemental Thoughts, Donald J. Kochan
Legal Mechanization Of Corporate Social Responsibility Through Alien Tort Statute Litigation: A Response To Professor Branson With Some Supplemental Thoughts, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
This Response argues that as Alein Tort Statute jurisprudence “matures” or becomes more sophisticated, the legitimate limits of the law regress. The further expansion within the corporate defendant pool – attempting to pin liability on parent, great grandparent corporations and up to the top – raises the stakes and complexity of ATS litigation. The corporate social responsibility discussion raises three principal issues about how a moral corporation lives its life: how a corporation chooses its self-interest versus the interests of others, when and how it should help others if control decisions may harm the shareholder owners, and how far the …
Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon
Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon
David G. Yosifon
The Supreme Court recently held Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) that the First Amendment forbids Congress from restricting the political speech of corporations. While corporate theory did very little to inform the Court’s thinking in Citizens United, this article argues that the holding in Citizens United requires us to rethink corporate theory. Specifically, this article demonstrates that the shareholder primacy norm in American corporate governance relies on the assumption that corporations can be restrained from influencing external governmental operations. We can enjoy the efficiencies generated by shareholder primacy, mainstream corporate theorists have long argued, because we can rely …
Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon
Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, David G. Yosifon
David G. Yosifon
The Supreme Court recently held in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) that the First Amendment forbids Congress from restricting the political speech of corporations. While corporate theory did very little to inform the Court’s thinking in Citizens United, this article argues that the holding in Citizens United requires us to rethink corporate theory. Specifically, this article demonstrates that the shareholder primacy norm in American corporate governance relies on the assumption that corporations can be restrained from influencing external governmental operations. We can enjoy the efficiencies generated by shareholder primacy, mainstream corporate theorists have long argued, because we can …
How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock
How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
How Incentives Drove the Subprime Crisis
In order to address any systemic problem, whether the goal is to change the system, regulate the system, or change the incentives driving a system, it is necessary to appreciate all the drivers operating within the system. In the case of the subprime crisis, one of the drivers was the changing nature of the subprime loans, which was not factored into the models used by the investment bankers, the credit rating agencies, and the issuers of credit default swaps.
This paper is an attempt to look dispassionately at the subprime crisis from a particular …
How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock
How Incentives Drove The Subprime Crisis, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
In order to address any systemic problem, whether the goal is to change the system, o regulate the system, or change the incentives driving a system, it is necessary to appreciate all the drivers operating within the system. In the case of the subprime crisis, one of the drivers was the changing nature of the subprime loans, which was not factored into the models used by the investment bankers, the credit rating agencies, and the issuers of credit default swaps.
This paper is an attempt to look dispassionately at the subprime crisis from a particular perspective, namely, the incentives that …
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Kenneth R. Davis
Abstract “Taking Stock – Salary and Options Too: The Looting of Corporate America” Executive compensation has come to mean corporate greed. CEO pay has soared to incomprehensible levels. Even during the current financial crisis, more CEOs saw pay increases than cuts. Public resentment to multi-million dollar paychecks swelled to outrage when AIG and Merrill Lynch used bailout funds to dispense enormous bonuses to executives. The looting of America’s corporations has led to numerous strategies to curb executive compensation. These strategies include heightened corporate disclosure requirements, tax incentives, say-on-pay, and shareholder input into the process for nominating directors. All these strategies …
Asset Specifity And Transaction Structures: A Case Study Of @Home Corporation, Brian Jm Quinn
Asset Specifity And Transaction Structures: A Case Study Of @Home Corporation, Brian Jm Quinn
Brian JM Quinn
No abstract provided.
Guioco Piano: The Acquiree's Dilemma, Karl T. Muth, Hans Trees
Guioco Piano: The Acquiree's Dilemma, Karl T. Muth, Hans Trees
Karl T Muth
This article discusses strategic decisions made by the acquiree in an M&A scenario and also includes a case study on Zond Energy and Enron.
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Kenneth R. Davis
Abstract of “Taking Stock – Salary and Options Too: The Looting of Corporate American” Executive compensation has come to mean corporate greed. CEO pay has soared to incomprehensible levels. Even during the current financial crisis, more CEOs saw pay increases than cuts. Public resentment to multi-million dollar paychecks swelled to outrage when AIG and Merrill Lynch used bailout funds to dispense enormous bonuses to executives. The looting of America’s corporations has led to numerous strategies to curb executive compensation. These strategies include heightened corporate disclosure requirements, tax incentives, say on pay, and shareholder input into the process for nominating directors. …
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Taking Stock -- Salary And Options Too: The Looting Of Corporate America, Kenneth R. Davis
Kenneth R. Davis
Abstract “Taking Stock – Salary and Options Too: The Looting of Corporate America” Executive compensation has come to mean corporate greed. CEO pay has soared to incomprehensible levels. Even during the current financial crisis, more CEOs saw pay increases than cuts. Public resentment to multi-million dollar paychecks swelled to outrage when AIG and Merrill Lynch used bailout funds to dispense enormous bonuses to executives. The looting of America’s corporations has led to numerous strategies to curb executive compensation. These strategies include heightened corporate disclosure requirements, tax incentives, say on pay, and shareholder input into the process for nominating directors. All …
Lessons From The Subprime Debacle: Stress Testing Ceo Autonomy, Steven A. Ramirez
Lessons From The Subprime Debacle: Stress Testing Ceo Autonomy, Steven A. Ramirez
Steven A. Ramirez
Corporate governance law in the United States played a central role in the subprime debacle. Specifically, CEOs exercised sufficient autonomy to garner huge compensation payments based upon illusory income. Instead of profits, firms absorbed huge risks. The economic losses arising from this misconduct total trillions of dollars. This article seeks to reconfigure CEO autonomy in the public firm based upon the best extant empirical evidence regarding the optimal contours of CEO autonomy. This vision of optimal autonomy is then viewed through the lens of the subprime catastrophe. The article articulates the political dynamics that have led to suboptimal contours for …
Why Not Tell The Truth?: Deceptive Practices And The Economic Meltdown, Charles W. Murdock
Why Not Tell The Truth?: Deceptive Practices And The Economic Meltdown, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Today we are witnessing a crisis caused by economic formulae developed without a responsible exercise of judgment and, in many instances, with a shocking disregard for the truth. The virtue of truthfulness is not just some abstract moral principle. Rather, it is a critical component of a well functioning society. As the current situation demonstrates, the lack of regard for truthfulness can have disastrous consequences, not just for our own country, but around the world.
This article will first examine how broadly truth is devalued throughout our society. Second, it will focus on the lack of truthfulness in politics and …