Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Penn Central (6)
- Takings clause (5)
- Private property (4)
- Property rights (4)
- Eminent domain (3)
-
- Fifth amendment (3)
- Land use (3)
- Property (3)
- The Quiet Revolution in Land Use Control (3)
- ALI (2)
- Dolan (2)
- Exactions (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- First English (2)
- Fred Bosselman (2)
- Just compensation (2)
- Koontz (2)
- Land use planning (2)
- Lucas (2)
- Nollan (2)
- Nuisance exception (2)
- Public use (2)
- Regulatory taking (2)
- San Remo (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Taking (2)
- Takings (2)
- The Taking Issue (2)
- Williamson County (2)
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Property Rights Revolution That Failed: Eminent Domain In The 2004 Supreme Court Term, David Schultz
The Property Rights Revolution That Failed: Eminent Domain In The 2004 Supreme Court Term, David Schultz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term, Leon D. Lazer
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term, Leon D. Lazer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federalism Cases In The October 2004 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Federalism Cases In The October 2004 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Art Of Stripping: How The Government Applies The Takings Clause To Strip You Of Your Property, Toni Kong
The Art Of Stripping: How The Government Applies The Takings Clause To Strip You Of Your Property, Toni Kong
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Big Chill? - The Likely Impact Of Koontz On The Local Governments/Developer Relationship, Julie A. Tappendorf, Matthew T. Dicanni
The Big Chill? - The Likely Impact Of Koontz On The Local Governments/Developer Relationship, Julie A. Tappendorf, Matthew T. Dicanni
Touro Law Review
This article will explore the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, showing how it has evolved in the context of land use and come to be the logical underpinning of controversial Supreme Court decisions regarding exactions. Part I will explain the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, providing a brief overview of its development over the course of the past century. Part II will then discuss how this doctrine has come to be the logical foundation on which the Supreme Court’s exactions jurisprudence rests. Part III will discuss the Koontz decision and its impact on the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. In Part IV, we …
The "Parcel As A Whole" In Context: Shifting The Benefits And Burdens Of Economic Life - Or Not, Edward J. Sullivan, Karin Power
The "Parcel As A Whole" In Context: Shifting The Benefits And Burdens Of Economic Life - Or Not, Edward J. Sullivan, Karin Power
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Trip Back In Time, Including Judge Charles D. Breitel's Rationale For His Fred French And Penn Central Decisions, Frank Schnidman
A Trip Back In Time, Including Judge Charles D. Breitel's Rationale For His Fred French And Penn Central Decisions, Frank Schnidman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substantive Due Process By Another Name: Koontz, Exactions, And The Regulatory Takings Doctrine, Mark Fenster
Substantive Due Process By Another Name: Koontz, Exactions, And The Regulatory Takings Doctrine, Mark Fenster
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Categorical (Lucas) Rule: "Background Principles," Per Se Regulatory Takings, And The State Of Exceptions, David L. Callies, David A. Robyak
The Categorical (Lucas) Rule: "Background Principles," Per Se Regulatory Takings, And The State Of Exceptions, David L. Callies, David A. Robyak
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Categorical Lucas Rule And The Nuisance And Background Principles Exception, Carol Necole Brown
The Categorical Lucas Rule And The Nuisance And Background Principles Exception, Carol Necole Brown
Touro Law Review
This article examines the seminal 1992 United States Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, specifically focusing on the Lucas nuisance exception. The author surveyed approximately 1,600 reported regulatory takings cases decided since the Lucas decision involving Lucas takings challenges. The author further identified the statutory nuisance cases in which state and local governments unsuccessfully asserted the Lucas nuisance exception as a defense to the courts’ findings of a Lucas taking. This article examines the prospective potential of these cases for assisting private property owners in enhancing private property rights protections within the area of regulatory takings.
The Rebirth Of Federal Takings Review? The Courts’ “Prudential” Answer To Williamson County’S Flawed State Litigation Ripeness Requirement, J. David Breemer
The Rebirth Of Federal Takings Review? The Courts’ “Prudential” Answer To Williamson County’S Flawed State Litigation Ripeness Requirement, J. David Breemer
Touro Law Review
This article reviews recent federal court decisions that have loosened the state litigation ripeness barrier to federal takings review based on its “prudential” character. Part II provides relevant background on Williamson County and the development of the state litigation rule. It explores the logic underlying the rule and the problems it causes in application. Part III reviews the judicial shift away from a jurisdictional understanding of the state litigation rule—under which compliance with the rule is a prerequisite to a court’s power to hear a takings claim—to a prudential view in which application of the state litigation rule lies within …
The Ripeness Game: Why Are We Still Forced To Play?, Michael M. Berger
The Ripeness Game: Why Are We Still Forced To Play?, Michael M. Berger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Common Law Foundations Of The Takings Clause: The Disconnect Between Public And Private Law, Richard A. Epstein
The Common Law Foundations Of The Takings Clause: The Disconnect Between Public And Private Law, Richard A. Epstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Other Tributes To Fred Bosselman, Edward J. Sullivan, Nancy E. Stroud
Other Tributes To Fred Bosselman, Edward J. Sullivan, Nancy E. Stroud
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fred Bosselman And The Taking Issue, David L. Callies
Fred Bosselman And The Taking Issue, David L. Callies
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Violations Of Zoning Ordinances, The Covenant Against Encumbrances, And Marketability Of Title: How Purchasers Can Be Better Protected, Jessica P. Wilde
Violations Of Zoning Ordinances, The Covenant Against Encumbrances, And Marketability Of Title: How Purchasers Can Be Better Protected, Jessica P. Wilde
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Still An Issue: The Taking Issue At 40, Patricia E. Salkin
Still An Issue: The Taking Issue At 40, Patricia E. Salkin
Touro Law Review
In October 2013, with the launch of Touro Law Center’s new Institute on Land Use and Sustainable Development Law, the Touro Law Review held a symposium to commemorate the 40th anniversary of “The Taking Issue: A Study of the Constitutional Limits of Governmental Authority to Regulate the Use of Privately-Owned Land Without Paying Compensation to the Owners” (The Takings Issue), the Council on Environmental Quality’s seminal report by Fred Bosselman, David Callies and John Banta. For this symposium Touro Law Review assembled some of today’s leading luminaries to reflect on how the taking issue has evolved and to assess where …