Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ADA (1)
- Adakai v. Front Row Seat Inc. (1)
- Advanced Marine Enterprises Inc. v. PRC Inc. (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Bartlett v. New York Board of Law Examiners (1)
- Bowman v. State Bank of Keysville (1)
- Christian Defense Fund v. Stephen Winchell's Associates (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (1)
- Conner v. National Pest Control Assn. (1)
- Courtney v. Ross Stores (1)
- Delph v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. (1)
- Doss v. Jamco (1)
- Eslami v. Global One Communications (1)
- FLSA (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Flayhart v. Interocean Ugland Management Corp. (1)
- Gochenour v. Beasley (1)
- Harper v. BP Exploration & Oil Inc. (1)
- Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins (1)
- Humphrey v. Columbia/HCA John Randolph (1)
- Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n (1)
- Lawrence Chrysler Plymouth Corp. v. Brooks (1)
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. (1)
- Merriweather v. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana Inc. (1)
- Miller v. SEVAMP (1)
- Nelson v. Boatmen's Bancshares (1)
- Oakley v. May Department Stores Co. (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Uniform Standard For Exemplary Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases, Judith J. Johnson
A Uniform Standard For Exemplary Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases, Judith J. Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
The standards for exemplary damages in employment discrimination cases are in disarray. The major federal provisions that prohibit private employment discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"),2 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ("§ 1981"), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), all have an indistinguishably worded standard for assessing exemplary damages: "reckless indifference to federally protected rights."
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Employment Law, Thomas M. Winn Iii
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Employment Law, Thomas M. Winn Iii
University of Richmond Law Review
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." For both Virginia employers and employees alike, this sentiment rang true over the past year in the employment law arena, with both camps winning and losing battles as they litigated various employment law matters. This article discusses three principal areas where there was substantial activity in Virginia's courts: public policy wrongful discharge claims; negligent hiring, retention, and supervision claims; and the enforcement of noncompetition agreements. Beyond the scope of this article are decisions rendered in other areas of law affecting the employment relationship, including the areas of workers' …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.