Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Labor and Employment Law

William & Mary Law School

William & Mary Law Review

Journal

Employer Liability

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Negligent Hiring And The Information Age: How State Legislatures Can Save Employers From Inevitable Liability, Katherine A. Peebles Mar 2012

Negligent Hiring And The Information Age: How State Legislatures Can Save Employers From Inevitable Liability, Katherine A. Peebles

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Failure Of Punitive Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases: A Call For Change, Joseph A. Seiner Dec 2008

The Failure Of Punitive Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases: A Call For Change, Joseph A. Seiner

William & Mary Law Review

Punitive damages were described by one early court as "an unsightly and an unhealthy excrescence." Although views toward punitive relief have changed over the years, the debate over the availability of exemplary damages in the judicial system has remained controversial. No place is that controversy more aptly demonstrated than in employment discrimination law, where punitive damages first became available in an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 after a bitter congressional debate. Almost a decade ago, in Kolstad v. American Dental Association, the Supreme Court provided guidance on how punitive damages should be applied in …


Contributory Disparate Impacts In Employment Discrimination Law, Peter Siegelman Nov 2007

Contributory Disparate Impacts In Employment Discrimination Law, Peter Siegelman

William & Mary Law Review

An employer who adopts a facially neutral employment practice that disqualifies a larger proportion of protected-class applicants than others is liable under a disparate impact theory. Defendants can escape liability if they show that the practice is justified by business necessity. But demonstrating business necessity requires costly validation studies that themselves impose a significant burden on defendants-upwards of $100,000 according to some estimates. This Article argues that an employer should have a defense against disparate impact liability if it can show that protected-class applicants failed to make reasonable efforts to train or prepare for a job related test. That is, …


Chadris, Inc. V. Latsis And The Test For Seaman Status: The Supreme Court Muddies The Waters Again, Anne Norris Graham Jan 1997

Chadris, Inc. V. Latsis And The Test For Seaman Status: The Supreme Court Muddies The Waters Again, Anne Norris Graham

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Employer Defamation: The Role Of Qualified Privilege, Pamela G. Posey Feb 1989

Employer Defamation: The Role Of Qualified Privilege, Pamela G. Posey

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.