Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights law (1)
- Collectively (1)
- Commentators (1)
- Contracts law (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Distribution (1)
- Enforceability (1)
- Enforceable (1)
- Improvements (1)
- Interpreting (1)
- Intersecting (1)
- Introduction (1)
- Knowledgeable (1)
- Labor & employment (1)
- Labor & employment law (1)
- Manufacturing (1)
- Overreaching (1)
- Predictability (1)
- Proliferation (1)
- Reasonableness (1)
- Technological (1)
- Understandings (1)
- Unionization (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Limits Of Multiple Rights And Remedies: A Call For Revisiting The Law Of The Workplace, Ann C. Hodges
The Limits Of Multiple Rights And Remedies: A Call For Revisiting The Law Of The Workplace, Ann C. Hodges
Law Faculty Publications
The IBM decision illustrates two major problems with current workplace regulation. First, there are two distinct but overlapping systems - the individual and the collective - which often collide. The result is, at best, an imperfect realization of rights under both systems, and perhaps more often, the sacrifice of rights under one to rights under the other. Second, the multitude of forums available for litigation results in multiple claims arising out of the same action, as well as tribunals deciding issues outside their expertise. After analyzing the IBM decision, I will consider the costs and benefits of the current regulatory …
The Business Fallout From The Rapid Obsolescence And Plannedobsolescence Of High-Tech Products: Downsizing Of Noncompetition Agreements, Ann C. Hodges, Porcher L. Taylor Iii
The Business Fallout From The Rapid Obsolescence And Plannedobsolescence Of High-Tech Products: Downsizing Of Noncompetition Agreements, Ann C. Hodges, Porcher L. Taylor Iii
Law Faculty Publications
The recent rapid pace of technological change has made human capital more important, yet it has rendered the employee’s knowledge base obsolete more quickly. Employers use covenants not to compete, restricting employees from switching to work for competitors, in order to retain knowledgeable personnel. Currently, the lack of predictability in interpreting noncompete agreements allows employers to draft overly-lengthy noncompetes, encourages enforcement litigation, and curtails employees from changing jobs because of the fear of litigation. Employees should not be prevented from working for competitors for longer than is necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interest. Use of obsolescence as a guide …