Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (2)
- Employee (2)
- FLSA (2)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (2)
- Title VII (2)
-
- Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 (1)
- Bostock v. Clayton County (1)
- Breach (1)
- Burden-shifting (1)
- Causation (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (1)
- Employee benefit plans (1)
- Employment (1)
- Exemption (1)
- Fairness and reasonableness standard (1)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services (1)
- Harassment (1)
- Impermissible (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Intern (1)
- Internship (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Legislative goals (1)
- Lynn's Food Stores (1)
- MCA (1)
- Mixed motive (1)
- Motor Carrier Act (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Employee Benefits Law—Shifting The Burden Out Of Neutral: Why Burden-Shifting Is Necessary In Erisa Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims, William G. Mcgrath
Employee Benefits Law—Shifting The Burden Out Of Neutral: Why Burden-Shifting Is Necessary In Erisa Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims, William G. Mcgrath
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employment Law—Just Let Them Handle It Amongst Themselves: An Argument In Favor Of Abandoning The Application Of The Lynn's Food Stores Standard To Flsa Settlement Agreements, Matthew C. Lewis
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employment Law—Antidiscrimination—Falling Into The Legal Void: How Arkansas Can Protect Unpaid Interns From Discrimination And Harassment, Christina Redmann
Employment Law—Antidiscrimination—Falling Into The Legal Void: How Arkansas Can Protect Unpaid Interns From Discrimination And Harassment, Christina Redmann
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Motor Carrier Excuse, David M. Cole
The Motor Carrier Excuse, David M. Cole
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cause For Concern Or Cause For Celebration?: Did Bostock V. Clayton County Establish A New Mixed Motive Theory For Title Vii Cases And Make It Easier For Plaintiffs To Prove Discrimination Claims?, Terrence Cain
Faculty Scholarship
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee “because of” race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This seems simple enough, but if an employer makes an adverse employment decision partly for an impermissible reason and partly for a permissible reason, i.e., if the employer acts with a mixed motive, has the employer acted “because of” the impermissible reason? According to Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the answer is no. The Courts in Gross and Nassar held that …