Law Commons^™

Re Iwk Health Centre And Nsnu (Kelsey), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was accused of inappropriate and unprofessional conduct by a Patient who was mentally ill. After the Employer's review the Grievor was discharged. The Grievor claims he is innocent and was terminated for unjust reasons. The Union requested that he be reinstated in the position he held and be compensated for all lost wages and benefits.

Re Halifax Regional School Board And Nsupe, Loc 2 (2-39-2001), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance filed October 11, 2001, alleging breach of Articles 6.01(b) and 10.03 of the Collective Agreement between the Employer and the Union in effect from January 1, 2001 to July 31, 2004, which the parties agreed is the relevant Collective Agreement for purposes of this matter, in that the Employer had violated Articles 6.01(b) and 10.03 and "has posted a number of jobs that do not specify the days of the week on which the work is to be carried out". At the hearing the Union sought a declaration of what it alleged was the proper interpretation of Article …

Re Caw-Canada, Local 2216 And Aca Co-Operative Ltd, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union claimed that the Grievor was unjustly suspended for four days, then unjustly discharged.

This is a consent award. The parties agree that the Grievor is to be reinstated, subject to certain conditions, and granted retroactive pay. The Arbitrator retains jurisdiction to deal with any grievances in respect of discipline against the Grievor for a period of one year from the date of the award.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance filed March 7, 2002 on behalf of all affected employees alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the expiry date January 31, 2003, in that the Employer violated Articles 2, 11, 13, 15, 17 and all other related provisions of the Collective Agreement by placing full-time supervisor, David Waller, into a full-time letter carrier position/assignment at the Dartmouth Delivery Centre. The Union seeks an order that the Employer remove David Waller from the full-time letter carrier position/assignment and grant full redress to all affected employees under either Article 39.01 or Article 17.04.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Gillingham), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union claims that the Employer has an obligation to notify employees at least an hour in advance of work shift overtime being extended longer than initially expected. The Employer submits that this has never been the practice, that it is contrary to the Agreement, and that it would be impractical.

The grievance fails. Application of the article in question as the Union seeks to have it interpreted is clearly not what the parties intended. Indeed, it would be unworkable where the original work shift extension overtime is only for one hour, as it quite often is.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Fitzhenry), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union brings this arbitration on behalf of six employees who were denied special leave with pay in the context of a severe winter storm in the St. John's area. The Union seeks lost rights, earnings, and benefits. The Employer's position is that it acted reasonably in denying special leave, because it was unsafe for the employees to leave before the end of their shift, and by the end of the shift, the storm had abated, so that at that time they would have had no difficulty getting home safely.

Mwf, Local 1 V Halifax Shipyard, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a policy grievance. The Union claims that the Employer has breached the Agreement by failing to pay bridge tolls and mileage to employees working on the rig Eirik Raud on the Dartmouth side of Halifax Harbour. The Union's position is that the Employer is obligated to reimburse employees for bridge tolls and automobile usage when they are not working at the Halifax plant. The Employer claims that this obligation is limited to those employees on day to day assignment outside the vicinity of the Halifax plant. It further argues that, as most of the employees in question have …

Re Ben's Ltd And Bct, Local 445, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor, as the Union's Shop Steward, is acting for employees in the Employer's thrift stores. The grievance was initiated when the hours of a part-time employee were reduced. The Union asserted that the Employer was manipulating hours to avoid making employees full-time. The Employer maintained that there is nothing in the Collective Agreement which requires the creation of full time jobs where it could, or otherwise prevent the assignment of work to minimize the number of full-time positions.

The grievance fails. Part-time employees were excluded from the Collective Agreement.

Re Air Nova Inc And Caw-Canada, Local 4236 (Hatt), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance on behalf of the Grievor alleging termination contrary to the provisions of the Collective Agreement between the parties, effective January 18, 1999 to January 17, 2002, in that the Grievor's probationary period under Article 8 had expired when he was terminated without just cause, contrary to Article 21. The Grievance also alleges that no information was supplied to the Grievor as to his performance progression throughout the probation­ary period.

Re Aliant Telecom Inc And Ac & Twu, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Policy Grievance 01-05 dated November 8, 2001 concerning the Contracting Out of Internet Member Services — Internet Dial Help Desk, which the Union alleges is contrary to Letter of Intent, Appendix E to the Common Part of the Collective Agreement between the Employer and the Union effective January 1, 1999 January 1, 2002, which the parties agree is the Collective Agreement applicable here. At the outset of the hearing, the parties agreed that I am properly seized of this matter and have jurisdiction to grant interim relief.

Re Nova Scotia Liquor Corp And Nsgeu, Local 470, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a consent award. The parties are agreed that the Employer breached the Agreement by not posting full-time jobs in the warehouse.

The Employer agrees to post seven (7) full-time warehouseman positions, and two (2) conditional warehouseman positions on or before December 14, 2001. The Union waives any right to claim entitlement to further warehouseman postings over the review periods spanning 1998 through 2001. The parties agree to make their best efforts to resolve issues in upcoming bargaining negotiations. Failing agreement on the meaning of the term "non-overlapping hours", either party may grieve its interpretation.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (105-00-00003), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union alleges that the Employer violated the Agreement by failing to provide the Union with the results of the five day count taken September 22-29, 1999. The Union 's original request on remedy was an order that the results be provided. However, since the hearing took place more than two years after the count, the Union now asks that the Employer be ordered to conduct another five day count within one month of the award. The Union asks that the Arbitrator remain seized of the matter should the parties be unable to agree on monetary remedy.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (105-00-00010), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union claims that the Employer has breached the Agreement by creating another part-time walk (walk 51) when it would have been practicable, as required by the Agreement, to combine part-time walks to create a full-time walk. The Union seeks an order that the Employer combine walk 51 with other part-time walks in order to create a full-time walk, and compensate any employees who have lost rights, earning and benefits from its failure to do so heretofore.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (N00-00-00008), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The parties have requested a declaratory judgement interpreting Article 20.10 of the Agreement, respecting deduction of sick leave credit. The Union takes the position that the Article applies to employees classified as full-time but only working part of the day due to participation in a work-hardening program or because of a disability being accommodated by the Employer. The Employer's position is that the provision is only intended to apply to absences for part of a full- time shift because of unexpected onset of illness during the shift.

Re Health Care Corp Of St. John's And Nape, Innis Christie, G Butler, D Hurley

Innis Christie Collection

Union policy grievance dated August 13, 1999, alleging breach of Articles 2, 3.08 and 22 of the Collective Agreement between the Employer and the Union signed June 2, 1998, with expiry date March 31, 2000, in that in a Memorandum to "All Employees" dated August 11, 1999 the Employer announced the introduction of a new Functional Assessment Form to be used by all employees seeking permission to be absent on sick leave in accordance with Article 22. Since February 1, 2000 the Functional Assessment Form, referred to by the parties as the "FAF", has in fact been required in a …

Twenty Years Of Labour Law And The Charter, Dianne Pothier

Dianne Pothier Collection

This article critically reviews the Charter jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada relating to labour law. The rejection of the right to strike and to bargain collectively as part of freedom of association reflect substantial judicial deference to legislative policy choices. Recently, however, a constitutional right of unfair labour protection for particularly vulnerable workers shows some judicial willingness to intervene. While freedom of expression provides significant scope to union supporters, picketing and leafleting are still subject to wide restraint, the exact parameters of which remain unclear. The Charter has had only a modest effect on labour law. Even successful …