Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Gallie), Innis Christie Nov 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Gallie), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties in respect of the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, which expired September 30, 1986 and remained in force pursuant to the extention provisions of the Canada Labour Code, and in particular Article 10, in that the Employer released the grievor from employment allegedly without just, reasonable or sufficient cause. The Union requests that the grievor be reinstated and reimbursed for any lost rights, benefits or earnings and that all reports, letters and documents relating to this matter be removed from her personal …


Re Canada Post Corp And Canadian Union Of Postal Workers, Innis Christie May 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Canadian Union Of Postal Workers, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Policy Grievance relating to grievance procedure. Grievance allowed.

At issue here is the binding effect of an arrangement between the parties in the Atlantic region which allows for the "Level 2" hearing in grievances relating to absenteeism to be held at Halifax rather than at the employer's head office. Also at issue was the question of whether the implication of this arrangement is that the union has the option of using the expedited arbitration procedure set out in paras. 13 to 25 of app. "E" to the collective agreement for such grievances.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke And Steiner), Innis Christie Apr 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke And Steiner), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee grievances alleging that the Employer violated Article 15 of the Collective Agreement between the parties relating to the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, Code: 608/81, which expired December 31, 1982 but was extended by Bill C-124 to September 30, 1984, in that the Employer bypassed the grievors in the administration of equal opportunity for overtime. The Union requested that the grievors be paid amounts equal to the amounts they would have been paid had they not been bypassed on the occasions in question.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie Apr 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee grievances alleging that the Employer violated Article 21 or Article 20 of the Collective Agreement between the parties relating to the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, Code: 608/81, which expired September 30, 1986, but which remains in effect by virtue of the Canada Labour Code, and in particular of Article 21.03 in that the Employer unreasonably withheld special leave, or, alternatively, Article 20 in that the Employer refused to allow sick leave. The Union requests that the grievor be paid for three hours and twenty minutes of special leave, or, alternatively, that he …


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie Mar 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee grievance alleging that the Employer violated Article 21 of the Collective Agreement between the parties relating to the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, Code: 608/81, which expired September 30, 1986, but which remains in effect by virtue of the Canada Labour Code, and in particular of Article 21.03 in that the Employer unreasonably withheld special leave. The Union requests that the grievor be paid for one hour and fifty minutes of special leave.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie Feb 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging that the Employer violated the Collective Agreement between the parties with respect to the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, which expires September 30, 1986, and in particular Article 15 in that the Employer by-passed the grievor in the administration of equal opportunity for overtime.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie Jan 1987

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievances alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties for the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, which expires September 30, 1986 and in particular Article 31, in that the Employer notified the griever, Richard, that he was to be held responsible for a wicket shortage which occurred in his wicket credit in the amount of $188,84, and the grievor Clark that he was to be held responsible for a wicket shortage which occurred in his wicket credit in the amount of $37.36. The Union requests that each griever not be held responsible …


Crossing The Lines In Dolphin Delivery: Some Thoughts On The Parameters Of The Charter Application - Unpublished, Dianne Potheier Jan 1987

Crossing The Lines In Dolphin Delivery: Some Thoughts On The Parameters Of The Charter Application - Unpublished, Dianne Potheier

Dianne Pothier Collection

A threatened picket line which never materialized turned into the unlikely setting out of which the Supreme Court of Canada drew the demarcation lines between litigation to which the Charter does and does not apply. I use the description "unlikely setting" not because it is odd that labour picketing was the context for debating the issue of Charter application. The considerable extent to which Canadian law leaves labour picketing to the common law makes it an obvious place to assess the Charter's application to the common law. But it could not have been less planned than Retail, Wholesale and Department …


Sobeys Stores Limited V. Yeomans Et Al: A Case Comment, Michael V. Coyle Jan 1987

Sobeys Stores Limited V. Yeomans Et Al: A Case Comment, Michael V. Coyle

Dalhousie Law Journal

In Sobeys Store Limited v. Yeomans et aLI the Appeal Division of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court seems to strike down the provisions of the provincial Labour Standards Code2 that make reinstatement a viable remedy for senior workers who have been dismissed without just cause. In reality, the judgement, now on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, may have missed its mark by a wide margin and, despite the obvious intention of the Court, left these very provisions untouched in the result.