Law Commons^™

New Vision, Old Model: How The Ftc Exaggerated Harms When Rejecting Business Justifications For Noncompetes, Alan J. Meese

Faculty Publications

The Federal Trade Commission has rejected consumer welfare and the Rule of Reason—standards that drove antitrust for 50 years—in favor of a “NeoBrandeisian” vision. This approach seeks to enhance democracy by condemning abuses of corporate power that restrict the autonomy of employees and consumers, regardless of impact on prices or wages. Pursuing this agenda, the Commission has proposed banning all employee noncompete agreements (“NCAs”) as unfair methods of competition under Section 5 of the FTC Act.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) articulating the Commission’s rationale found that NCAs reduce aggregate wages, harm traditionally recognized by the Rule of Reason. …

Are Employee Noncompete Agreements Coercive? Why The Ftc's Wrong Answer Disqualifies It From Rulemaking (For Now), Alan J. Meese

Faculty Publications

The Federal Trade Commission recently proposed a rule banning nearly all employee noncompete agreements (“NCAs”) as unfair methods of competition under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The proposed rule reflects two complementary pillars of an aggressive new enforcement agenda championed by Commission Chair Lina Khan, a leading voice in the Neo-Brandeisian antitrust movement. First, such a rule depends on the assumption, rejected by most prior Commissions, that the Act empowers the Commission to issue legislative rules. Proceeding by rulemaking is essential, the Commission has said, to fight a “hyperconcentrated economy” that injures employees and consumers alike. Second, …

Symposium Introduction: The Effect Of Dobbs On Work Law, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In March 2023, Chicago-Kent College of Law hosted a symposium—The Effect of Dobbs on Work Law—to explore the ways that the Dobbs abortion decision has affected the workplace. The presenters at that live symposium wrote articles that are being published in this journal. As the host of the symposium and the Editor of this Journal, I use this Article to introduce the articles in this symposium issue and to provide my reflections on them. I also briefly address the topic that I presented at the symposium—the effect of Dobbs on people with disabilities.

Subordination Through Schedules, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

Our jobs are not only about the work we do—they are also about when and where we do that work. For a variety of reasons, employees with disabilities often seek modifications of their employers’ policies regarding when and where work is performed. These accommodations are often necessary for the employee to remain employed. The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, and these accommodations can include schedule changes. But research demonstrates that when responding to accommodation requests under the ADA, employers are often reluctant to grant requests to modify the rules regarding …

Working Through The Supreme Court's 2021 Term, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

Despite the controversy surrounding the Supreme Court's 2021 term, the labor and employment cases, in comparison, might seem relatively uneventful. Although there are several cases summarized below, most of them deal with relatively minor issues surrounding arbitration, or with lesser litigated statutes, such as USERRA and ERISA. This review also includes a summary of the administrative law case regarding the Environmental Protection Act because it could (and perhaps likely will) have ramifications for labor and employment law.

[...]

This review proceeds in two additional parts. Part II of this review summarizes the opinions from the 2021 term. At the end …

Don't Abolish Employee Noncompete Agreements, Alan J. Meese

Faculty Publications

For over three centuries, Anglo-American courts have assessed employee noncompete agreements under a Rule of Reason. Despite long-standing precedent, some now advocate banning all such agreements. These advocates contend that employers use superior bargaining power to impose such "contracts of adhesion," preventing employees from selling their labor to the highest bidder and reducing wages. Abolitionists also contend that such agreements cannot produce cognizable benefits and that employers could achieve any benefits via less restrictive alternatives without limiting employee autonomy.

This Article critiques the Abolitionist position. Arguments for banning noncompete agreements echo hostile critiques of other nonstandard contracts during antitrust law's …

#Metoo And The Process That's Due: Sexual Misconduct Where We Live, Work, And Learn, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

The #MeToo movement has been instrumental in bringing attention to the pervasiveness of sexual harassment and sexual assault (collectively, sexual misconduct) in all walks of life and in all environments, including at work, school, home, and out in public. But the movement has also brought with it a great deal of confusion about how we define sexual misconduct and whether and when legal liability attaches. Part of the confusion can be blamed on the fact that at least three discrete areas of law can possibly apply to sexual misconduct—criminal law, Title VII (when the sexual misconduct takes place in the …

Disability Diversity And Identity Capitalism, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

I first read Professor Nancy Leong’s compelling book Identity Capitalists: The Powerful Insiders Who Exploit Diversity to Maintain Inequality when I was asked to provide a pre-publishing peer review. I was equal parts captivated and troubled by the numerous examples of identity capitalism (and its counterpart, identity entrepreneurialism) that I had never thought about, and perhaps even acquiesced in.

[...]

But in all honesty, I was troubled after my initial review of the manuscript because I had the sense that Leong was suggesting that diversity itself is bad, or at least that concentrating on diversity is bad. Upon my review …

Working While Mothering During The Pandemic And Beyond, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

Although combining work and family has never been easy for women, working while mothering during the pandemic was close to impossible. When COVID-19 caused most workplaces to shut down, many women were laid off. But many women were forced to work from home alongside their children, who could not attend daycare or school. Mothers tried valiantly to combine a full day’s work on top of caring for young children and helping school-aged children with remote school. But many found this balance difficult, leading to women’s lowest workforce participation rate in over forty years. And even women who did not quit …

Relationships And Retaliation In The #Metoo Era, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In this #MeToo era, so much important work is being done (and so many stories are being told and listened to), but very little of the work focuses on retaliation. And none of the work focuses on situations where the fear of retaliation is not necessarily job loss (although that certainly happens) but rather, it is the fear of harming workplace relationships. This Article will use a real-life story of harassment to demonstrate how much workplace relationships matter-especially to women-and how the fear of harming those relationships often affects an employee's willingness to report harassment. Thus, this Article argues for …

Adverse Employment Actions In Failure-To-Accommodate Claims: Much Ado About Nothing, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article addresses a circuit split in the disability law jurisprudence. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employees generally bring two types of claims against their employers—discrimination claims and failure-to-accommodate claims. Succeeding on a discrimination claim requires proving that the employee suffered an adverse employment action. Succeeding on a failure-to-accommodate claim does not. But several courts—including a recent case in the Tenth Circuit—have added this adverse-employment-action requirement into failure-to-accommodate claims. In doing so, these courts have camouflaged important issues about an employer’s obligation to provide a reasonable accommodation to disabled employees. Although I believe that courts that require an …

Accommodating Pregnancy Five Years After Young V. Ups: Where We Are & Where We Should Go, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article will explore how pregnant employees fare when they are denied accommodations in the workplace that would have allowed them to work safely through their pregnancies. The two most commonly used legal avenues for pregnant plaintiffs are the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Successful cases under the ADA were rare until Congress expanded the ADA’s definition of disability in 2008. PDA claims became easier after the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. This Article will analyze both the body of PDA cases decided since Young, and …

Disabling Ada Retaliation Claims, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In this article, I set out to explore what effect the expansion of the definition of “disability” would have on the post-Amendments retaliation cases. What I discovered surprised me. Despite the common belief that retaliation cases are often more successful than cases alleging status-based discrimination, this did not prove to be true with respect to this dataset of ADA retaliation cases. In fact, as indicated by the title of this article, courts are continuing to disable employees’ retaliation claims under the ADA. Plaintiffs lost (i.e., did not survive a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment) in three-quarters …

Explaining "Not Disabled" Cases Ten Years After The Adaaa: A Story Of Ignorance, Incompetence, And Possibly Animus, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

I set out to find and read every case that addressed the definition of disability from the point my last article left off until the present (January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2018). This resulted in 976 cases. Of those 976 cases, the court erroneously held that the plaintiff was not disabled in 210 of them...

This Article attempts to explain what went wrong—why did courts incorrectly hold that the plaintiff was not disabled in more than 200 cases? The answer, I’ve concluded, is a little bit of ignorance (courts and parties that were apparently unaware that the ADAAA was …

A New Look At The Ada's Undue Hardship Defense, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

...This Article will not only summarize and attempt to categorize the undue hardship cases but will also identify three trends that become apparent when engaging in a thorough analysis of this body of cases.

This Article will proceed in four additional parts. Part II will provide the background of the undue hardship provision, including the statutory language and its regulations, the legislative history, and the undue hardship cases decided under the precursor to the ADA—the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Part III will delve into the undue hardship cases under the ADA. Even though most people think about undue hardship as …

An Ambitious Approach, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In their book, Lifetime Disadvantage, Discrimination and the Gendered Workforce, Susan Bisom-Rapp and Malcolm Sargeant explore the disadvantages women experience in the workforce throughout their careers and the cumulative effects of those disadvantages over their lifetimes.

[...]

Part II of this review is a chapter-by-chapter summary of the book. Part III provides my critical evaluation of the both the goals of this book and its execution. Part IV uses this book's ambitious approach as a springboard for exploring one of my own research projects that has been simply gathering dust.

This abstract has been taken from the author's introduction.

Mothers With Disabilities, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

For the past several decades, feminist theorists have focused on the intersection of sex and other identities: race, primarily, but also religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and ethnicity. More recently, a few scholars have begun exploring the intersection of sex and disability, highlighting the unique obstacles facing women with disabilities. This Article advances the intersectionality literature by exposing and exploring the marginalization experienced by mothers with disabilities. Specifically, this Article will explore how the stereotypes that apply to women, mothers, and individuals with disabilities, intersect to produce a particularly precarious position for mothers with disabilities in the workplace (employment law) …

Ending Harassment By Starting With Retaliation, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Essay posits that the fear of retaliation significantly contributes to the problem of harassment—we cannot hope to end harassment without starting by addressing the reality of retaliation. Although some scholars have argued that the fear of retaliation is one reason women don’t report harassment, and some scholars have discussed the inadequacies of anti-retaliation law, this Essay breaks new ground by arguing that ending harassment must start with preventing retaliation. Part I backs up what seems to be a commonsense proposition: Many victims of harassment do not report it because they fear retaliation.5 Part II then describes the difficulty in …

Cumulative Hardship, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

Although there are plenty of cases that mention the undue-hardship provision under the ADA, there are relatively few cases where the undue-hardship provision is outcome-determinative or even discussed in depth. To complicate matters further, the Author of this Article could find no case where the court discussed the issue of cumulative hardship in the ADA context. This Article explores this issue and arrives at possible solutions for how this issue should be resolved when it arises.

This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I gives an introduction to the ADA and the undue-hardship provision. Part 1H gets to the heart …

Public Policy And Workers' Rights: Wrongful Discipline Actions And Good-Faith Beliefs, Ann C. Mcginley, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

The purpose of this paper is to provide our thoughts on Chapter 5 of the ALI's Restatement of the Law: Employment Law ("Restatement of Employment Law"), concerning "The Tort of Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy."'

...

Instead of a detailed critique of Chapter 5's provisions, we have chosen to focus on two significant issues that we see as problematic and worthy of further discussion. The first involves the elimination in the final draft of the Restatement of protection against wrongful discipline, which left only the protection against wrongful discharge that violates public policy.

...

The second …

Ptsd, Tbi, And Oth Discharges: A Case Study Of A Young Service Member, Patricia E. Roberts

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Accommodating Everyone, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article attempts to eliminate “special treatment stigma” by accommodating everyone. Special treatment stigma occurs when some employees (usually individuals with disabilities and workers with caregiving responsibilities) are provided with accommodations in the workplace. This receipt of “special treatment” causes employers and coworkers to resent these employees. This Article argues that the best way to ameliorate the stigma that accompanies special treatment in the workplace is to accommodate everyone through a universal accommodation mandate. This mandate would require employers to accommodate all employees who request an accommodation in the workplace, regardless of the reason for the accommodation. As long as …

Special Treatment Stigma After The Ada Amendments Act, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article explores a unique source of stigma suffered by individuals with disabilities in the workplace. Instead of focusing on those with the most stigmatizing disabilities, I focus on those individuals who have disabilities that are not perceived as very severe, yet they still suffer stigma. These individuals are stigmatized because of the special treatment they receive (or are perceived as receiving) through workplace accommodations provided pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In prior work, I have called this phenomenon "special treatment stigma, " the harm that arises from receiving special treatment in the workplace, especially when coworkers …

Withdrawn Accommodations, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article addresses a phenomenon that often arises in reasonable accommodation cases under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a phenomenon I call “withdrawn accommodations.” This occurs when an employer has agreed to provide an accommodation to an employee with a disability and then later withdraws the accommodation. Employers might withdraw accommodations for a couple of reasons. First, an employer might withdraw an accommodation because it finds out that the employee’s need for the accommodation is permanent, rather than temporary, as the employer might have first believed. Second, a new supervisor might arrive on the scene, and decide to withdraw a …

The Difficulty Accommodating Health Care Workers, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

I argue that accommodating health care workers is difficult, perhaps more difficult than accommodating other workers, and I explain why. First, in Part II, I will describe the characteristics of health care jobs that make those jobs difficult for individuals with disabilities. These characteristics include: (1) most health care jobs are physically rigorous, often involving heavy lifting, pushing, and walking and standing for long periods of time; (2) most health care jobs involve long hours and/or shift work; and (3) the majority of jobs in the health care industry are safety-sensitive positions, with life or death often hanging in the …

Self-Perception Of Disability And Prospects For Employment Among U.S. Veterans, Christopher L. Griffin Jr., Michael Ashley Stein

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Mutual Marginalization: Individuals With Disabilities And Workers With Caregiving Responsibilities, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

This Article explores the marginalization of two groups of employees--individuals with disabilities and workers with caregiving responsibilities. One might argue that these two groups have little in common. However, while these groups are not perfectly aligned, they do have much in common in the workplace. First, these employees are unable to consistently meet their employers' expectations of an "ideal worker." Thus, they often must seek adjustments or modifications in the workplace to accommodate for their failure to conform to the ideal-worker norm. The need for accommodation causes both groups of employees to suffer from "special-treatment stigma," which manifests itself in …

Finding A Fix For The Fmla: A New Perspective, A New Solution, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

When the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") was enacted in 1993, it was considered landmark legislation.... Yet, despite the promise of the FMLA, by almost all accounts it has not achieved much.... Over the years, scholars have proposed many solutions to improve the FMLA.

[...]

In this article, I am taking a different perspective and proposing a reform that I have not seen proposed before. Of all of the problems with the FMLA, the one that gets the least attention is the frequency with which employees abuse their rights under the FMLA and the difficulty employers have administering the …

Women, Unions, And Negotiation, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In a period when union membership is at an all-time low (at least in the private sector), some (or perhaps many) people have given up hope that the labor movement can be revived. I believe that the labor movement still has the potential to be successful but needs to be re-imagined and reinvigorated. One way (among many) of doing this is to increase women's attachment to the labor movement. Now that women comprise nearly 47 percent of the workforce, it makes sense to have a concentrated effort to increase their union participation.

Not only will more women in unions increase …

Choices, Bias, And The Value Of The Paycheck Fairness Act: A Response Essay, Nicole B. Porter

Faculty Publications

In the previous article written by Gary Siniscalco, Lauri Damrell, and Clara Morain Nabity [The Pay Gap, the Glass Ceiling, and Pay Bias: Moving Forward Fifty Years After the Equal Pay Act], the authors argue that the pay gap is not primarily caused by employer discrimination, but rather can be attributed to many factors, including the "glass ceiling" and choices made by women regarding occupation, caregiving, and commitment to the workforce. Thus, they argue that we should not place blame on employers and focus on the reach of anti-discrimination laws, and should instead acknowledge that there is a …