Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Aca (1)
- Casino (1)
- EEOC (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (1)
-
- Employment laws (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Foxwoods Casino (1)
- Health care (1)
- Indian Exemption (1)
- Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (1)
- Indian Preference (1)
- Indian gaming (1)
- Indian sovereignty (1)
- Indian tribal employer (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- Labor (1)
- MPLRL (1)
- Mashantucket Pequot Labor Relations Law (1)
- NEPA (1)
- Navajo Employment Preference Act (1)
- Non-native american employees (1)
- Patient protection and affordable care act (1)
- Peabody (1)
- Pension Protection Act of 2006 (1)
- Pequot (1)
- Reservation (1)
- State law (1)
- Statute of general applicability (1)
- Tribal employers (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
“Play Or Pay”: Interpreting The Employer Mandate Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act As It Relates To Tribal Employers, Rachel Sibila
“Play Or Pay”: Interpreting The Employer Mandate Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act As It Relates To Tribal Employers, Rachel Sibila
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Labor Law And The Mashantucket Pequot: Union Organizing At Foxwoods Casino, Derek Ghan
Federal Labor Law And The Mashantucket Pequot: Union Organizing At Foxwoods Casino, Derek Ghan
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Evolution Of The Applicability Of Erisa To Indian Tribes: We May Finally Have Congressional Intent, But It's Still Flawed, Alicia K. Crawford
The Evolution Of The Applicability Of Erisa To Indian Tribes: We May Finally Have Congressional Intent, But It's Still Flawed, Alicia K. Crawford
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Rewriting Of The Indian Employment Preferences--A Case Comment: E.E.O.C. V. Peabody Western Coal Company, 400 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2005), Brendan O'Dell
Judicial Rewriting Of The Indian Employment Preferences--A Case Comment: E.E.O.C. V. Peabody Western Coal Company, 400 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2005), Brendan O'Dell
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.