Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Child welfare (2)
- Eddings v. Oklahoma (2)
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Acree v. Acree (1)
- Advocacy (1)
-
- Bailes v. Sours (1)
- Banes v. Pulaski Department of Social Services (1)
- Bell v. Ohio (1)
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School District (1)
- Beyah v. Shelton (1)
- Bowen v. American Hospital Association (1)
- Box v. Talley (1)
- Brinkley v. Brinkley (1)
- Brumfield v. Brumfield (1)
- Buxton v. Bishop (1)
- California Youth Authority (1)
- Capital Punishment (1)
- Capital Punishment of Juveniles (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Cass v. Lassiter (1)
- Caswell v. Lang (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Children (1)
- Churchv. Commonwealth (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Rights for Juveniles (1)
- Contemporary Standards (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- D'Auria v. D'Auria (1)
- Davis v. Commonwealth (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hearing On Overcrowding At Department Of The Youth Authority Facilities, Senate Select Committee On Children And Youth
Hearing On Overcrowding At Department Of The Youth Authority Facilities, Senate Select Committee On Children And Youth
California Senate
No abstract provided.
Hearing On Child Abuse Reporting Laws And Dependency Statutes, Senate Select Committee On Children And Youth
Hearing On Child Abuse Reporting Laws And Dependency Statutes, Senate Select Committee On Children And Youth
California Senate
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Gang Violence, Senate Committee On Judiciary
Juvenile Gang Violence, Senate Committee On Judiciary
California Senate
No abstract provided.
The Decency Of Capital Punishment For Minors: Contemporary Standards And The Dignity Of Juveniles, Lawrence A. Vanore
The Decency Of Capital Punishment For Minors: Contemporary Standards And The Dignity Of Juveniles, Lawrence A. Vanore
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Lawyers And Children: Wisdom And Legitimacy In Family Policy, Carl E. Schneider
Lawyers And Children: Wisdom And Legitimacy In Family Policy, Carl E. Schneider
Michigan Law Review
A Review of In the Interest of Children: Advocacy, Law Reform, and Public Policy by Robert H. Mnookin, Robert A. Burt, David L. Chambers, Michael S. Wald, Stephen D. Sugarman, Franklin E. Zimring, and Rayman L. Solomon
Computers: The Link To Missing Children, 7 Computer L.J. 73 (1986), Michelle M. Fujimoto
Computers: The Link To Missing Children, 7 Computer L.J. 73 (1986), Michelle M. Fujimoto
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
After unusual activity at both the federal and state levels in the previous year, this past year was a relatively uneventful one where the law of juvenile delinquency was concerned. The historic jail removal legislation enacted at the 1985 session of the Virginia General Assembly became fully effective on July 1, 1986. The provisions of this legislation severely limit the use of an adult jail for juvenile detention purposes and completely ban the dispositional use of such a facility for juveniles.
Casenotes: Criminal Procedure — Juveniles — State Law Authorizing Pretrial Detention Of Juveniles Upon A Finding Of Risk Of Future Criminal Behavior Upheld As Valid Under The Due Process Clause. Schall V. Martin, 104 S. Ct. 2403 (1984), Kim Detrick
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tortious Interference With Visitation Rights: A New And Important Remedy For Non-Custodial Parents, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 307 (1986), Lawrence A. Goldman
Tortious Interference With Visitation Rights: A New And Important Remedy For Non-Custodial Parents, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 307 (1986), Lawrence A. Goldman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parents, Psychologists And Child Custody Disputes: Protecting The Privilege And The Children, Marjorie F. Knowles, Caroline Chunn Mccarthy
Parents, Psychologists And Child Custody Disputes: Protecting The Privilege And The Children, Marjorie F. Knowles, Caroline Chunn Mccarthy
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
Zbaraz V. Hartigan: Mandatory Twenty-Four Hour Waiting Period After Parental Notification Unconstitutionally Burdens A Minor's Abortion Decision, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1071 (1986), Debra A. Harvey
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Eighth Amendment And Capital Punishment Of Juveniles, Victor L. Streib
The Eighth Amendment And Capital Punishment Of Juveniles, Victor L. Streib
Cleveland State Law Review
The practice of imposing the death penalty for crimes committed while under the age of eighteen has occurred sporadically but persistently throughout American history. It gives every indication of continuing in this mode under current law and practice. Greatly differing approaches are followed by the various states as to the authorization and imposition of capital punishment for juveniles. This article explores the existence of a constitutionally-mandated minimum age below which the states may not venture in carrying out this practice. If such a nationwide minimum age exists or should exist, its justification can be found in current interpretations of the …
The Court-Ordered Predisposition Evaluation Under Washington's Juvenile Justice Act: A Violation Of The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?—Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40, Judith H. Ramseyer
The Court-Ordered Predisposition Evaluation Under Washington's Juvenile Justice Act: A Violation Of The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?—Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40, Judith H. Ramseyer
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment analyzes the significance of the principles animating the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination by first looking at the purposes of Washington’s Juvenile Justice Act; second, by examining the status of the privilege against self-incrimination during sentencing; and third, by applying the values protected by the privilege to the use of predisposition psychological evaluations in Washington juvenile courts.
Court-Ordered Foster Family Care Reform: A Case Study, Michael B. Mushlin
Court-Ordered Foster Family Care Reform: A Case Study, Michael B. Mushlin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The authors examine the implications of G. L. v. Zumwalt, a case that resulted in a far-reaching consent decree that mandates specific reforms in policy and practice to be implemented by a public social welfare agency in its delivery of services to foster children and their families.
Disabled Newborns And The Federal Child Abuse Amendments: Tenuous Protection, Steven R. Smith
Disabled Newborns And The Federal Child Abuse Amendments: Tenuous Protection, Steven R. Smith
Faculty Scholarship
This Article first explores the scope of the problem of withholding lifesaving treatment from seriously impaired infants. Next, the Article examines the interests involved in decisions to withhold treatment and the rationales for them. It contends that there are limitations on parental child-rearing rights and suggests standards to define when treatment may be withheld. The Article then reviews recent efforts to protect disabled newborns and points out a shift in the focus of these efforts toward a reliance on child abuse and neglect laws. Next, the Article surveys the development of federal and state child abuse and neglect statutes. The …
Juvenile Law, Catherine Ryan, Lisa Gordon
Juvenile Law, Catherine Ryan, Lisa Gordon
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.