Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accomack County Department of Social Services v. Muslimani (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Books Received (1)
- Cain v. Commonwealth ex rel. Departmentof Social Services for the City of Roanoke (1)
- California v. Hodari D. (1)
-
- Campbell v. Commonwealth (1)
- Carter v. Commonwealth (1)
- Doe v. Dewhirst (1)
- Fisher v. Commonwealth (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Goodall v. Stafford County School Board (1)
- History (1)
- In re Adoption of A.R.M. (1)
- In re Adoption of Renaud (1)
- Index (1)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (1)
- Johnson v. Prince William County School Board (1)
- K.A.M. v. Miller (1)
- Kaywood v. Halifax County Department of Social Services (1)
- Lavinder v. Commonwealth (1)
- Silver Anniversary (1)
- Stanley v. Fairfax County Department of Social Services (1)
- Tice v. Botetourt County School Board (1)
- Tullos v. Roanoke City Departmentof Social Services (1)
- URESA (1)
- Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1)
- Walker v. Commonwealth (1)
- Wyatt v. Virginia Department of Social Services (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
The past year was considerably more tranquil than recent years with regard to legal developments involving children. For example, there were no major United States Supreme Court decisions directly affecting children, and the 1991 Virginia General Assembly's actions impacted on children mainly through budget cuts and the disappointing abolition of the Department for Children - a result of those cuts. Virginia's child labor laws were extensively revised in 1991, but few of these revisions will make a noticeable difference in the work relationships of the state's youth because they largely conform state law to existing federal law. Finally, legislation was …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.