Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (3)
- Banks and banking (2)
- Economic jurisprudence (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (2)
-
- Admission requirements (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Affirmative (1)
- Agent Orange (1)
- American (1)
- Angel v. State (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate practices (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Artful pleading (1)
- Article 998 (1)
- Article 999 (1)
- Arvel (Rod) Ponton III (1)
- Assumption of liability (1)
- Avco Corporation v. Aero Lodge No. 735. (1)
- Bi-racial (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Campus police (1)
- Canadian Criminal Code (1)
- Causation (1)
- Charles Cantú (1)
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Civil War (1)
- Class action (1)
- Committee on Federal Courts of the New York State Bar Association (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 58
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sexism, Language, And The Law, Mary Ellen Griffith
Sexism, Language, And The Law, Mary Ellen Griffith
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deregulation, Reregulation, And The Myth Of The Market, Edward L. Rubin
Deregulation, Reregulation, And The Myth Of The Market, Edward L. Rubin
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Myth Of "Reregulation": The Interest Group Dynamics Of Regulatory Change In The Financial Services Industry, Jonathan R. Macey
The Myth Of "Reregulation": The Interest Group Dynamics Of Regulatory Change In The Financial Services Industry, Jonathan R. Macey
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Social And Racial Tolerance And Freedom Of Expression In A Democratic Society: Friends Or Foes? Regina V. Zundel, Stefan Braun
Social And Racial Tolerance And Freedom Of Expression In A Democratic Society: Friends Or Foes? Regina V. Zundel, Stefan Braun
Dalhousie Law Journal
In Regina v. Zundel the Ontario Court of Appeal held that s. 177 of the Canadian Criminal Code, entitled "Spreading false news," did not contravene the guarantee of freedom of expression under s. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms3 and that even if it did, it constituted a permissible regulation under s. 1 of the Charter. Section 177 of the Code punishes "everyone who wilfully publishes a statement, tale, or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest." The defendant was charged under the section …
Justice Powell's Constitutional Opinions, George Clemon Freeman, Jr.
Justice Powell's Constitutional Opinions, George Clemon Freeman, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Faith In The Republic: A Frances Lewis Law Center Conversation, Stanley Hauerwas, Sanford Levinson, Mark V. Tushnet
Faith In The Republic: A Frances Lewis Law Center Conversation, Stanley Hauerwas, Sanford Levinson, Mark V. Tushnet
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Judicial Reception Of Legislative Facts, Ann Woolhandler
Rethinking The Judicial Reception Of Legislative Facts, Ann Woolhandler
Vanderbilt Law Review
In a recent article, Professor Peggy Davis called for reforms in judicial reception of legislative facts. Her suggestions, which follow an empirical analysis of the use of psychological parent theories in child custody disputes, echo similar proposals by Professor Kenneth Karst in 1960s and by Professors Arthur Miller and Jerome Barron in 1975 for judicial reception of legislative facts in constitutional cases.As originally defined by Kenneth Culp Davis, legislative facts are facts that "inform[] a court's legislative judgment on questions of law and policy." They contrast with adjudicative facts, which are facts about "what the parties did, what the circumstances …
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ninth Amendment's Role In The Evolution Of Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence, Geoffrey G. Slaughter
The Ninth Amendment's Role In The Evolution Of Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence, Geoffrey G. Slaughter
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Edwards V. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit For Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988), John R. Russell
Edwards V. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit For Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nollan V. California Coastal Commission: Unprecedented Intrusion Upon A State's Judgment Of The Proper Means To Be Applied In Land Use Regulation, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 641 (1988), Mary M. Cizerle
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insider Trading Liability Of Tippees And Quasi-Insiders: Crime Shouldn't Pay, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Insider Trading Liability Of Tippees And Quasi-Insiders: Crime Shouldn't Pay, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural And Substantive Problems In Complex Litigation Arising From Disasters, Jack B. Weinstein
Procedural And Substantive Problems In Complex Litigation Arising From Disasters, Jack B. Weinstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Alien Tort Statute: International Human Rights Watchdog Or Simply Historical Trivia, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 341 (1988), Debra A. Harvey
The Alien Tort Statute: International Human Rights Watchdog Or Simply Historical Trivia, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 341 (1988), Debra A. Harvey
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Costello V. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.: Illinois' Innocent Construction Rule Prevails Over The Constitutional Privilege For Expression Of Opinion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 427 (1988), Jerald B. Holisky
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Transportation Agency: The United States Supreme Court Weighs Statistical Imbalance In Favor Of Affirmative Action, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (1988), Denise C. Hockley-Cann
Johnson V. Transportation Agency: The United States Supreme Court Weighs Statistical Imbalance In Favor Of Affirmative Action, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 593 (1988), Denise C. Hockley-Cann
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Reversal Of Shakman: Is It Also A Return To The Spoils, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 681 (1988), Linda Horras
The Reversal Of Shakman: Is It Also A Return To The Spoils, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 681 (1988), Linda Horras
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hazelwood School District V. Kuhlmeier: How Useful Is Public Forum Analysis In Evaluating Restrictions On Student Expression In The Public Schools, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 403 (1988), Mark N. Bonaguro
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Terminating The Guardianship: A New Role For State Courts., M. P. Duncan Iii
Terminating The Guardianship: A New Role For State Courts., M. P. Duncan Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Texas Civil Procedure - Evidence Of Net Worth - Net Worth Is Discoverable And Admissible Into Evidence For The Purpose Of Assessing Punitive Damages Recent Development., Mark A. Lindow
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Liability Of Parents For Conduct Of Their Child Under Section 33.01 Of The Texas Family Code: Defining The Requisite Standards Of Culpability., L. Wayne Scott
Liability Of Parents For Conduct Of Their Child Under Section 33.01 Of The Texas Family Code: Defining The Requisite Standards Of Culpability., L. Wayne Scott
St. Mary's Law Journal
Section 33.01 of the Texas Family Code uses archaic terms and needs to be updated to eliminate confusion. This section provides an expansive statutory avenue for recovering from the parent damages previously unavailable at common law for a child's acts. However, the extent of parental liability under both of the available statutory provisions—negligence and strict liability—is disputable. While section 33.01 currently uses the terms "willful" and "malicious," these terms should be excluded in favor of "intentional" and "grossly negligent conduct." In an age when tort liability is determined more from an insurance theory than a fault theory, section 33.01 of …
Texas Civil Procedure - Bill Of Review - Meritorious Defense Requirement In Bill Of Review Proceeding To Vacate Default Judgment, Without Effective Service Of Process Or Propert Notice Of Default Judgment, And Resulting In Adverse Consequences, Violates The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause Recent Development., William B. Nash
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Evolving Concept Of Preemption Removal: An Expansion Of Federal Jurisdiction., Scott Roberts
The Evolving Concept Of Preemption Removal: An Expansion Of Federal Jurisdiction., Scott Roberts
St. Mary's Law Journal
Federal jurisdiction based on preemption removal should extend to federal laws which meet the requirements of Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Taylor. The well-pleaded complaint rule restricts federal removal jurisdiction. The well-pleaded complaint rule requires a federal question appear on the face of the plaintiff’s complaint for federal jurisdiction to attach. Therefore, the defendant’s right to a federal forum depends upon whether the plaintiff chooses to invoke a federal claim in its complaint. Courts routinely criticize the linking of removal jurisdiction to the well-pleaded complaint rule for giving plaintiffs incentive to …