Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Regulation (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- Behavioral science (1)
- Benefit-cost analysis (1)
- CBA (1)
-
- Campaign finance (1)
- Cognitive bias (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Elections (1)
- Forum defendant rule (1)
- Gabriel Weil (1)
- Individual Preferences in Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework (1)
- Individual preferences (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Markets (1)
- Nudge thesis (1)
- Policymakers (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Purposivism (1)
- Rationality (1)
- Regulatory policy (1)
- Snap removal (1)
- Social welfare (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Textualism (1)
- WTP (1)
- Weil (1)
- Willingness to pay (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Individual Preferences In Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework, Gabriel Weil
Individual Preferences In Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework, Gabriel Weil
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Segregation Of Markets, Christian Turner
The Segregation Of Markets, Christian Turner
Scholarly Works
Campaign-finance reformers fear that rich donors’ money can be used disproportionately to influence the content of campaign advertising and thus, perhaps, the results of elections. In European football, UEFA has attempted to ban “financial doping,” rich owners’ use of money earned in sectors other than football to pay large sums for the best football players. Campaign-finance reform efforts and “financial fair play” rules in sport may seem like bespoke solutions to different problems. In fact, they are the same solution to the same problem. Both are attempts to ensure that power accumulated in one market is not brought into another …
Snap Removal: Concept; Cause; Cacophony; And Cure, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Thomas O. Main, David Mcclure
Snap Removal: Concept; Cause; Cacophony; And Cure, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Thomas O. Main, David Mcclure
Scholarly Works
So-called “snap removal” – removal of a case from state to federal court prior to service on a forum state defendant – has divided federal trial courts for 20 years. Recently, panels of the Second, Third and Fifth Circuits have sided with those supporting the tactic even though it conflicts with the general prohibition on removal when the case includes a forum state defendant, a situation historically viewed as eliminating the need to protect the outsider defendant from possible state court hostility.
Consistent with the public policy underlying diversity jurisdiction – availability of a federal forum to protect against defending …
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia’S Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia’S Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
Scholarly Works
What constitutes judicial influence and how should it be measured? Curious about the broader role that rhetoric plays in judicial influence over time, we undertook a rhetorical-computational analysis of the 282 majority opinions that Justice Scalia wrote during his 30 years on the Supreme Court. Our analysis is the first to examine the full majority opinion output of a Supreme Court justice using a unique “medium data” approach that combines rhetorical coding with quantitative analysis relying on Shepard’s Citations and LexisNexis headnotes. The resulting study casts doubt on the ability of judicial authors, including Justice Scalia, to control the extent …