Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Afghanistan (1)
- American freudians (1)
- Bowers v. hardwick (1)
- Bush Doctrine (1)
- Causal relevance (1)
-
- Chinese Political and Judicial System (1)
- Conversational relevance (1)
- Culture wars (1)
- Derecho Procesal Civil (1)
- Don't ask don't tell (1)
- Essentialism (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Ex-gay (1)
- Exclusionary reasons (1)
- Force (1)
- Foucault (1)
- Gay (1)
- Gay gene (1)
- Gay liberation (1)
- Havelock ellis (1)
- History of sexuality (1)
- Homosexuality (1)
- Human Rights & Humanitarian Law (1)
- ICTR (1)
- Interhamwe (1)
- Inversion (1)
- Inverts (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Jurisprudence & Philosophy (1)
- Krafft ebing (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Political And Legal Governance Under The Judicial Reform: A Case Study On Basic-Level Political And Legal Committee(司法改革背景下的政法治理方式——基层政法委员会制度个案研究), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Manual De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Manual De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda: A Paper Umbrella In The Rain? Initial Pitfalls And Brighter Prospects, Jackson N. Maogoto
The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda: A Paper Umbrella In The Rain? Initial Pitfalls And Brighter Prospects, Jackson N. Maogoto
Jackson Nyamuya Maogoto
The tragedy which befell Rwanda in 1994 deserves a special place in the bloodstained pages of history. The Rwandan genocide merits distinction primarily because of its shocking efficiency, its scale and its proportional dimensions among the victim population. The Security Council's resolution establishing the ICTR articulates a set of decisions, assumptions, wishes, and objectives. Primarily, the States that voted in favour of the creation of the ICTR indicated that the root of the problem was individual violations of international criminal law. Only one State that voted for the resolution did not equate ipso facto ICTR actions with justice. That State …
Rushing To Break The Law? “The Bush Doctrine” Of Pre-Emptive Strikes And The Un Charter Regime On The Use Of Force, Jackson N. Maogoto
Rushing To Break The Law? “The Bush Doctrine” Of Pre-Emptive Strikes And The Un Charter Regime On The Use Of Force, Jackson N. Maogoto
Jackson Nyamuya Maogoto
The issues that the Article tackles are obviously complex and lengthy, however the Article has as its modest goal the exploration of the general arguments that the use of force to counter terrorism raises under the UN Charter regime on the use of force. In Part II, the Article gives an overview of the UN and terrorism noting the ambivalence in addressing the issue that has contributed to the confusion over a precise definition in large part reflective of the basic disagreement over the elements of terrorism itself. Part II then adopts a definition for the purposes of this Article. …
An Argument From Democracy Against School Choice: A Critique Of Zelman V. Simmons-Harris, Moshe Cohen-Eliya, Yoav Hammer
An Argument From Democracy Against School Choice: A Critique Of Zelman V. Simmons-Harris, Moshe Cohen-Eliya, Yoav Hammer
Yoav Hammer
No abstract provided.
Science, Identity, And The Construction Of The Gay Political Narrative, Nancy J. Knauer
Science, Identity, And The Construction Of The Gay Political Narrative, Nancy J. Knauer
Nancy J. Knauer
This Article contends that the current debate over gay civil rights is, at base, a dispute over the nature of same-sex desire. Pro-gay forces advocate an ethnic or identity model of homosexuality based on the conviction that sexual orientation is an immutable, unchosen, and benign characteristic. The assertion that, in essence, gays are "born that way," has produced a gay political narrative that rests on claims of shared identity (i.e., homosexuals are a blameless minority) and arguments of equivalence (i.e., as a blameless minority, homosexuals deserve equal treatment and protection against discrimination). The pro-family counter-narrative is based on a behavioral …
Two Conceptions Of Relevance, Jonathan Yovel
Two Conceptions Of Relevance, Jonathan Yovel
Jonathan Yovel
Courts use complex modes of relevance judgments in regulating the introduction of information and construction of factual narratives; likewise, common law works both through and around relevance presuppositions in determining doctrine. This study examines different functions of relevance - conceived as different conceptions, at times competing, at times interdependent. The distinctions between these conceptions are arranged on three levels: 1) a normative/"causal" level, arguing for the status of relevance as a requirement for a "meaning-based" conception of entailment and drawing on discussions from relevance logic (RL) and modal logic; 2) a pragmatic/metapragmatic level that explores the ways in which law's …