Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law (3)
- Code Revision Commission (CRC) (1)
- Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts (1)
- Columbia Law Review Forum (1)
- Common law (1)
-
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Norms (1)
- Constitutional Theory (1)
- Copyright Act of 1976 (1)
- General Jurisprudence (1)
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org (1)
- Government and politics (1)
- Government edicts doctrine (1)
- Inc. (PRO) (1)
- Individual dignity (1)
- International relations (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Knowing society (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal Decision-Making (1)
- Legal Reasoning (1)
- Legal Sociology (1)
- Legal analysis and writing (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) (1)
- Personal liberty (1)
- Philosophy and ethics (1)
- Privacy in public (1)
- Privacy rights (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Anti-Modalities, David E. Pozen, Adam Samaha
Anti-Modalities, David E. Pozen, Adam Samaha
Faculty Scholarship
Constitutional argument runs on the rails of “modalities.” These are the accepted categories of reasoning used to make claims about the content of supreme law. Some of the modalities, such as ethical and prudential arguments, seem strikingly open ended at first sight. Their contours come into clearer view, however, when we attend to the kinds of claims that are not made by constitutional interpreters – the analytical and rhetorical moves that are familiar in debates over public policy and political morality but are considered out of bounds in debates over constitutional meaning. In this Article, we seek to identify the …
Restatements Of Statutory Law: The Curious Case Of The Restatement Of Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Restatements Of Statutory Law: The Curious Case Of The Restatement Of Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Faculty Scholarship
For nearly a century, the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatements of the Law have played an important role in the American legal system. And in all of this time, they refrained from restating areas of law dominated by a uniform statute despite the proliferation and growing importance of such statutes, especially at the federal level. This omission was deliberate and in recognition of the fundamentally different nature of the judicial role and of lawmaking in areas governed by detailed statutes compared to areas governed by the common law. Then in 2015, without much deliberation, the ALI embarked on the task …
Charles Reich And The Legal History Of Privacy, Sarah Seo
Charles Reich And The Legal History Of Privacy, Sarah Seo
Faculty Scholarship
Historians’ interest in Reich offers a case study of the relationship between historical and legal studies. What can legal scholars learn from historians, and what can historians learn from legal scholarship? This Essay will explore these two questions by focusing on Igo’s The Known Citizen since she encountered Reich not with the dual citizenship of a legal historian but as an intellectual historian. I will first highlight what legal scholars can learn from historians by summarizing the main arguments in The Known Citizen. Then, I will provide an alternative legal account to Igo’s history of privacy, which may clear …
Long Live The Common Law Of Copyright!: Georgia V. Public.Resource.Org., Inc. And The Debate Over Judicial Role In Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Long Live The Common Law Of Copyright!: Georgia V. Public.Resource.Org., Inc. And The Debate Over Judicial Role In Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Faculty Scholarship
In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., the Supreme Court resurrected a nineteenth-century copyright doctrine – the government edicts doctrine – and applied it to statutory annotations prepared by a legislative agency. While the substance of the decision has serious implications for due process and the rule of law, the Court’s treatment of the doctrine recognized an invigorated role for courts in the development of copyright law through the use of principled reasoning. In expounding the doctrine, the Court announced a vision for the judicial role in copyright adjudication that is at odds with the dominant approach under the Copyright …