Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Bail reform (1)
- Criminal legal reform (1)
-
- Discovery reform (1)
- Dobbs (1)
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Foreign Affairs Prosecutions (1)
- Indictments (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial culture (1)
- Judicial decision-making (1)
- Judicial norms (1)
- Judicial role (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- New York (1)
- New York 2020 reforms (1)
- Polarization (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prosecution (1)
- Public health (1)
- Reproductive coercion (1)
- Reproductive freedom (1)
- Reproductive justice (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Social Representations (1)
- Social repercussions (1)
- Symposium (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion, Aziza Ahmed, Dabney P. Evans, Jason Jackson, Benjamin Mason Meier, Cecília Tomori
Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion, Aziza Ahmed, Dabney P. Evans, Jason Jackson, Benjamin Mason Meier, Cecília Tomori
Faculty Scholarship
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary …
Judicial Resistance To New York's 2020 Criminal Legal Reforms, Angelo Petrigh
Judicial Resistance To New York's 2020 Criminal Legal Reforms, Angelo Petrigh
Faculty Scholarship
Scholars have examined judiciaries as organizations with their own culture and considered how this organizational culture can form a significant impediment to the implementation of reforms.22 There is a strong connection between judicial culture and a reform’s ability to accomplish its stated goals. Some go so far as to state that most reforms will fail because of the difficulty in altering judicial culture.23 These studies sometimes focus on legislators misunderstanding the actual effects of legislation when it was drafted, or on the failure to account for particularities in a law’s implementation by undervaluing the fragmentation, adversarial nature, and …
How Do Prosecutors "Send A Message"?, Steven Arrigg Koh
How Do Prosecutors "Send A Message"?, Steven Arrigg Koh
Faculty Scholarship
The recent indictments of former President Trump are stirring national debate about their effects on American society. Commentators speculate on the cases’ impact outside of the courtroom — on the 2024 election, on political polarization, and on the future of American democracy. Such cases originated in the prosecutor’s office, begging the question of if, when, and how prosecutors should consider the societal effects of the cases they bring.
Indeed, prosecutors often publicly claim that they “send a message” when they indict a defendant. What, exactly, does this mean? Often, their assumption is that such messaging goes in one direction: indictment …