Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- Selected Works (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
-
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Federal jurisdiction (5)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Federal Courts (2)
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- Terrorism (2)
- Anti-injunction statute (1)
- Anti-suit injunction (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Assets (1)
- Chemical warfare (1)
- Chemical weapons (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Circuit court (1)
- Civil Rico Actions (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Combatants (1)
- Common law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Contra forces (1)
- Court administration (1)
- Courts/United States (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Criminals (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Defenses (1)
- Dependent discrimination (1)
- Publication
-
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- George D. Brown (3)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
-
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- Publications (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
When Federalism And Separation Of Powers Collide - Rethinking Younger Abstention, George D. Brown
When Federalism And Separation Of Powers Collide - Rethinking Younger Abstention, George D. Brown
George D. Brown
No abstract provided.
The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm Of Society?, Peter Duff, Mark Findlay, Carla Howarth
The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm Of Society?, Peter Duff, Mark Findlay, Carla Howarth
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The claim that the jury is a randomly chosen and representative sample of community is an important part of the ideology which currently underpins the institution. Supporters of the jury argue that both its impartiality and its independence from the State are bolstered by the fact that it represents a randomly selected cross-section of the populace. In most common law jurisdictions where the jury operates, various steps have been taken over recent years in order preserve and strengthen the perception of the jury as a "microcosm of democratic society". For example, in England the property qualification for jurors was removed …
Nonideological Judicial Reform And Its Limits-The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee, George D. Brown
Nonideological Judicial Reform And Its Limits-The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee, George D. Brown
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carden V. Arkoma Associates: A Refusal To Extend The Rule Treating Corporations As Citizens To Limited Partnerships For Federal Diversity Jurisdiction, Joseph J. Buch
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Has The Supreme Court Confessed Error On The Eleventh Amendment? Revisionist Scholarship And State Immunity, George D. Brown
Has The Supreme Court Confessed Error On The Eleventh Amendment? Revisionist Scholarship And State Immunity, George D. Brown
George D. Brown
The simple text of the eleventh amendment belies the complexity of the jurisprudence surrounding it. Professor George D. Brown uses the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. as a jumping-off point to determine where the Court stands today on the delicate balance between national supremacy and state sovereignty. In the divided Court's endorsement of congressional power to abrogate the states' immunity he detects a shift toward national supremacy. Professor Brown finds abrogation theory to be as problematic as what came before it. Nevertheless, he accepts the current framework as a compromise that protects state …
To Be Or Not To Be: The Validity Of Pendent Party Jurisdiction Remains Unanswered After Finley V. United States, Janis T. Butler
To Be Or Not To Be: The Validity Of Pendent Party Jurisdiction Remains Unanswered After Finley V. United States, Janis T. Butler
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Untying The Gordian Knot: An Orderly Approach To Federal Jurisdiction Issues In A Basic Course In United States Constitutional Law, Thomas C. Marks Jr.
Untying The Gordian Knot: An Orderly Approach To Federal Jurisdiction Issues In A Basic Course In United States Constitutional Law, Thomas C. Marks Jr.
Campbell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction Over Civil Tax Cases, Larry Kramer
Rationalizing Removal, Charles Rothfeld
The Demise Of Pendent And Ancillary Jurisdiction, Thomas M. Mengler
The Demise Of Pendent And Ancillary Jurisdiction, Thomas M. Mengler
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diversity Jurisdiction, Larry Kramer
Exclusive Or Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Private Civil Rico Actions: Finding The Appropriate Reference, Kimberly O'D. Thompson
Exclusive Or Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Private Civil Rico Actions: Finding The Appropriate Reference, Kimberly O'D. Thompson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Juenger's Challenge To The Interest Analysis Approach To Choice-Of-Law: An Appreciation And A Response, Robert A. Sedler
Professor Juenger's Challenge To The Interest Analysis Approach To Choice-Of-Law: An Appreciation And A Response, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Finley V. United States: Unstringing Pendent Jurisdiction, Wendy Collins Perdue
Finley V. United States: Unstringing Pendent Jurisdiction, Wendy Collins Perdue
Law Faculty Publications
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court in Finley v. United States calls into question not only pendent-claim jurisdiction but ancillary jurisdiction as well. Particularly vulnerable to attack are those uses of ancillary jurisdiction that involve the addition of new parties such as class action, intervention, and impleader. Furthermore, the opinion may lay a foundation for attacking ancillary-claim jurisdiction involving counterclaims or cross-claims. This commentary will examine Finley and the potential impact of the opinion on the various permutations of ancillary and pendent jurisdiction.
The Ker-Frisbie Doctrine: A Jurisdictional Weapon In The War On Drugs, Andrew B. Campbell
The Ker-Frisbie Doctrine: A Jurisdictional Weapon In The War On Drugs, Andrew B. Campbell
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Note addresses the ongoing use of extra legal apprehension, as applied under "Ker v. Illinois" and "Frisbie v. Collins," as a viable alternative to extradition in obtaining custody over those accused of exporting drugs to the United States. The author outlines the cultural and political reasons for the production of illicit drugs, examines the purposes and structures of formal extradition treaties and their effectiveness in bringing drug traffickers to trial, and considers the alternatives to formal extradition. The author concludes that extralegal apprehension, in both of its two forms--abduction and irregular rendition--should remain an alternative means of securing custody …
Toward A Unified Theory Of The Jurisdiction Of The United States Courts Of Appeals, Thomas E. Baker
Toward A Unified Theory Of The Jurisdiction Of The United States Courts Of Appeals, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
G. Heilman Brewing Co., Inc. V. Joseph Oat Corp.: The Seventh Circuit Approves The Exercise Of Inherent Authority To Increase A District Judge's Pre-Trial Authority Under Rule 16, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 517 (1990), Bradley Adas
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Crime In The Federal Forum, Roger J. Miner '56
State Crime In The Federal Forum, Roger J. Miner '56
Criminal Law
No abstract provided.
Coordinated Transnational Interaction In Civil Litigation And Arbitration, Peter F. Schlosser
Coordinated Transnational Interaction In Civil Litigation And Arbitration, Peter F. Schlosser
Michigan Journal of International Law
About fifteen years ago, an English shipowner chartered his vessel, the Mareva, to time charterers. After a while, the charterers discontinued payment on the charter and the shipowner instituted court proceedings against them. The plaintiff, concerned about the ability and willingness of the defendants to satisfy an expected judgment, simultaneously applied for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from disposing of a subcharter which had been paid into their London bank account. The injunction was granted. Since then, injunctions of this kind have been denominated "Mareva injunctions," although it was the second, rather than the first, case where such an …
The Modern Blood Feud: Thoughts On The Philosophy Of Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
The Modern Blood Feud: Thoughts On The Philosophy Of Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Herman Melville brilliantly lets us feel, through Captain Ahab, the sensation of destructive rage, hatred and violence. Sadly, Melville's insight penetrates to the core of society, perhaps of each of us, in today's omnipresent terroristic melodrama. We have all suffered moments of vicarious terror and rage over the past few years as we watched news accounts of terrorist incidents, such as the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The melodrama of terrorism has penetrated each of our lives. We see it and feel the rage nearly on a daily basis. Innocent children, women and men aboard Pan …
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on high crimes in international law, and the ability to extradite state and high government officials for committing them.
The Prospects For Enforcing Monetary Judgments Of The International Court Of Justice: A Study Of Nicaragua's Judgment Against The United States, Mary Ellen O'Connell
The Prospects For Enforcing Monetary Judgments Of The International Court Of Justice: A Study Of Nicaragua's Judgment Against The United States, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Strangers In A Strange Land: Foreign Compulsion And The Extraterritorial Application Of United States Employment Law, Michael A. Jr. Warner
Strangers In A Strange Land: Foreign Compulsion And The Extraterritorial Application Of United States Employment Law, Michael A. Jr. Warner
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
The increasingly interdependent nature of the world economy has made commonplace the overseas employment of United States citizens by United States multinational corporations. When an American company employs a United States citizen in a foreign country questions arise as to what extent the United States may regulate employment activity taking place outside of United States territorial boundaries. Historically, principles of territoriality and nationality have constrained the ability of a sovereign state to prescribe conduct occurring outside of its boundaries. Under traditional principles of jurisdiction, employee relations fell predominantly under the control of the local authorities where the person or persons …
"You Can Lead A Horse To Water . . .": The Supreme Court's Refusal To Allow The Exercise Of Original Jurisdiction Conferred By Congress, Donald L. Doernberg
"You Can Lead A Horse To Water . . .": The Supreme Court's Refusal To Allow The Exercise Of Original Jurisdiction Conferred By Congress, Donald L. Doernberg
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article will address primarily the lack of textual and historical support for the Court's narrow construction of jurisdictional provisions that cause it to deny the existence of jurisdiction. In addition, the Article will briefly describe the lack of historical support for the Court's independent development of the abstention doctrines and their consequent illegitimacy. Both areas share democratic theory and institutional legitimacy concerns that Professor Redish will address, but let me respectfully suggest that these issues are best understood in light of the congressional thought underlying the Title 28 authorizations.
Shedding New Light On An Old Debate: A Federal Indian Law Perspective On Congressional Authority To Limit Federal Question Jurisdiction, Kevin J. Worthen
Shedding New Light On An Old Debate: A Federal Indian Law Perspective On Congressional Authority To Limit Federal Question Jurisdiction, Kevin J. Worthen
Faculty Scholarship
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction over cases arising under federal law from thefederal Indian law viewpoint allows consideration of the issues in a concrete setting. Experience under the Indian Civil Rights Act during the last twenty years indicates that some federal review of actions arising under federal law is needed if the command of the supremacy clause is to be fully effectuated. At the same time, it indicates that a uniform interpretation of that federal law is not essential to the enforcement of the clause. This examination thus provides support for the distributive …
Choice Of Forum And Choice Of Law In The Federal Courts: A Reconsideration Of Erie Principles, Earl M. Maltz
Choice Of Forum And Choice Of Law In The Federal Courts: A Reconsideration Of Erie Principles, Earl M. Maltz
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Anti-Suit Injunctions In International Litigation, George A. Bermann
The Use Of Anti-Suit Injunctions In International Litigation, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
Of the various forms of provisional relief in the context of inter-national litigation, none has sparked as much interest and controversy as the international anti-suit injunction. In many ways the international anti-suit injunction, an instrument by which a court of one jurisdiction seeks to restrain the conduct of litigation in another jurisdiction, resembles more conventional forms of international provisional relief such as the foreign attachment or preliminary injunction. Like them, the anti-suit injunction affords courts an important opportunity to affect the course and significance of litigation abroad. However, such intervention strongly implies – and often actually creates – jurisdictional conflict …
Justice Scalia And The Elusive Idea Of Discrimination Against Interstate Commerce, Richard B. Collins
Justice Scalia And The Elusive Idea Of Discrimination Against Interstate Commerce, Richard B. Collins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Jurisdiction, Ronald J. Mann
Federal Jurisdiction, Ronald J. Mann
Faculty Scholarship
One important task of the federal judiciary is to resolve cases presenting tensions between national and state governments. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit justly is renowned for its work in this area. One major, if not sensational, arena in which these tensions surface is in cases presenting issues of federal jurisdiction, pursuant to which federal courts allocate power between the national and state judicial systems.
During the survey period the Fifth Circuit published almost one hundred opinions dealing with substantive issues of federal jurisdiction. Like others before me, I have not undertaken in this essay …
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.