Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Corporations (2)
- International Criminal Court (2)
-
- Personal jurisdiction (2)
- Treaties (2)
- Aleinikoff (Alexander) (1)
- Alienage Jurisdiction Statute (1)
- Amicus brief (1)
- Appellate jurisdiction (1)
- Authorities cited by Arkansas Supreme Court; Arkansas Supreme Court 1950-2000; (1)
- CLECs (1)
- Cell Phone Regulation (1)
- Cellular Phone Regulation (1)
- Christopher R. Day (1)
- City of Boerne v. Flores (1)
- Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (1)
- Conservatism (1)
- Crimes against humanity (1)
- Cyberlaw (1)
- Dependent Overseas Territories (1)
- Domestic relations--Minnesota (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Ex parte Young (1)
- FCC (1)
- Farnan (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
-
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1)
- William Mitchell Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 25 of 25
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is Federal Preemption Efficient In Cellular Phone Regulation, Thomas W. Hazlett
Is Federal Preemption Efficient In Cellular Phone Regulation, Thomas W. Hazlett
Federal Communications Law Journal
While many recent state-level efforts to regulate various aspects of the cellular phone industry have been abandoned in favor of federal regulations, other attempts by state regulators still exist. For this reason, Thomas Hazlett proposes that federal regulation is generally more appropriate than state-level action, due to the nature of the cellular industry. After a brief history of the industry, the author analyzes the pros and cons associated with state and federal regulation. The Article then proceeds to address the efficiencies created by national networks and proposes that the fragmentation of controlling regulatory power would reduce these efficiencies. Following a …
Critique And Consequences Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Holmes V. Vornado, Kenneth C. Bass Iii, Linda E. Alcorn
Critique And Consequences Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Holmes V. Vornado, Kenneth C. Bass Iii, Linda E. Alcorn
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
In The Stream Of The Commerce Clause: Revisiting Asahi In The Wake Of Lopez And Morrison, Andrew Kurvers Spalding
In The Stream Of The Commerce Clause: Revisiting Asahi In The Wake Of Lopez And Morrison, Andrew Kurvers Spalding
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Section 1446(B) Federal Removal Jurisdiction And The Thirty-Day Clock: Should A Motion To Amend Trigger The Time Bomb?, Briant S. Platt
Section 1446(B) Federal Removal Jurisdiction And The Thirty-Day Clock: Should A Motion To Amend Trigger The Time Bomb?, Briant S. Platt
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Stateless Corporation Finds A Home: Alienage Jurisdiction And Dependent Overseas Territories - J.P. Morgan Chase Bank V. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure Limited, Michael Cornell Dypski
The Stateless Corporation Finds A Home: Alienage Jurisdiction And Dependent Overseas Territories - J.P. Morgan Chase Bank V. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure Limited, Michael Cornell Dypski
San Diego International Law Journal
The purpose of this Article is to discuss the evolution of the alienage jurisdiction statute and the status of overseas dependent territories in light of the recent Supreme Court decision. Part I of this Article will provide a brief historical background of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and its purpose. Part II will discuss the concepts of the state and statelessness, as well as the role of dependent territories in international affairs. Part III will discuss and analyze the various federal decisions seemingly at loggerheads with each other on the issue of federal jurisdiction over dependent territories. Finally, Part IV will …
The Impossibility Of Citizenship, Peter J. Spiro
The Impossibility Of Citizenship, Peter J. Spiro
Michigan Law Review
These are interesting times at the constitutional margins. Questions about where the Constitution takes up and leaves off are more frequently in play; one can no longer so readily assume the Constitution to supply an authoritative metric as we confront prominent cases of nonapplication. At the same time, the increasing robustness of international norms has prompted a vigorous reconsideration of their relationship to domestic ones. Where the twentieth century was marked by deep segmentation among national legal regimes, with minimal transboundary interpenetration, recent years have seen the advent of complex, overlapping regimes: subnational, national, regional, and global, public, and private. …
Formalism, Pragmatism, And The Conservative Critique Of The Eleventh Amendment, Michael E. Solimine
Formalism, Pragmatism, And The Conservative Critique Of The Eleventh Amendment, Michael E. Solimine
Michigan Law Review
For many years the Second Amendment to the constitution was construed by most authorities to grant a communal right to bear arms, through state militias and the like. Some years ago Sanford Levinson labeled this interpretation "embarrassing" to liberal scholars. That characterization was deserved, Levinson argued, since liberal academics had been eager to defend expansive interpretations of other rights-granting provisions of the Constitution. But they failed to do so when it came to language in the Second Amendment, which could be plausibly construed to grant an individual right to bear arms. The failure might be attributed, in part, to the …
Arising Under Jurisdiction And Uniformity In Patent Law, Christopher A. Cotropia
Arising Under Jurisdiction And Uniformity In Patent Law, Christopher A. Cotropia
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The law governing the Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction was brought into question in Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Circulation Systems, Inc. The Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction over Vornado's appeal rested solely on Vornado's counterclaim alleging patent infringement by Holmes. Holmes's complaint sought a declaratory judgment of no trade dress infringement and did not include any patent law claims. While the Federal Circuit found appellate jurisdiction over Vornado's appeal based on the counterclaim of patent infringement, the Supreme Court disagreed. The Court focused on the language in 35 U.S.C. § 1338(a), which defines the Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction by the statute's …
Access To Local Rights-Of-Way: A Rebuttal, William Malone
Access To Local Rights-Of-Way: A Rebuttal, William Malone
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Author rebuts the proposals and analysis regarding the impact of local rights-of-way access on competitive local exchange carriers put forth in a May 2002 FCLJ Article by Christopher Day. He argues that Day's Article lacks persuasive evidence that CLECs are harmed by lack of rights-of-way access. He states, first, that Day has misconceived the intent of the rights-of-way requirements in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and, second, that the FCC does not have the authority to make substantive adjucative decisions that Day called for. He concludes that neither of the proposals made by Day-an amendment to the Telecommunications Act …
Intervening In The Case (Or Controversy): Article Iii Standing, Rule 24 Intervention, And The Conflict In The Federal Courts, Tyler R. Stradling, Doyle S. Byers
Intervening In The Case (Or Controversy): Article Iii Standing, Rule 24 Intervention, And The Conflict In The Federal Courts, Tyler R. Stradling, Doyle S. Byers
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who Makes The Call On Capital Punishment? How Ring V. Arizona Clarifies The Apprendi Rule And The Implications On Capital Sentencing , Sim?N Cantarero
Who Makes The Call On Capital Punishment? How Ring V. Arizona Clarifies The Apprendi Rule And The Implications On Capital Sentencing , Sim?N Cantarero
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Essay: Jurisdiction In Family Law Matters: The Minnesota Perspective, Robert E. Oliphant
Essay: Jurisdiction In Family Law Matters: The Minnesota Perspective, Robert E. Oliphant
William Mitchell Law Review
This article adds to the growing library of analysis and commentary on Minnesota family law. It surveys, reviews, analyzes, and comments on the decisions of Minnesota's appellate courts in the sometimes challenging and always interesting areas of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. The article examines many of the more common issues associated with jurisdiction that impact Minnesota family law in the areas of child support, custody, property division, maintenance, and paternity. It investigates the jurisdictional questions involved when applying Minnesota's long-arm statute and weighs the potential constitutional barriers to its application. It also examines relevant provisions of the Parental Kidnapping …
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate And Jurisdiction To Prescribe In International Criminal Courts, Kenneth S. Gallant
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate And Jurisdiction To Prescribe In International Criminal Courts, Kenneth S. Gallant
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Seventh Circuit Decisions: Class Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 837 (2003), Iain D. Johnston
Survey Of Seventh Circuit Decisions: Class Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 837 (2003), Iain D. Johnston
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Jurisdiction Under The U.S.-Korea Status Of Forces Agreement: Problems To Proposals, Yoon-Ho Alex Lee
Criminal Jurisdiction Under The U.S.-Korea Status Of Forces Agreement: Problems To Proposals, Yoon-Ho Alex Lee
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Some Troubling Elements In The Treaty Language Of The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Catherine R. Blanchet
Some Troubling Elements In The Treaty Language Of The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Catherine R. Blanchet
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Note will examine problems that arise from the language of the Rome Statute itself. Part II will examine the potential strategic uses of the Rome Statute's jurisdictional aspects. It will also examine how the fairness concerns raised by this potential usage are exacerbated when the potential State abuser is a permanent member of the Security Council. Part III will look at the language of the Rome Statute's definition of crimes against humanity. It will also examine the various and varying interpretations of this language by the scholars and commentators who have examined the issue.
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article furthers this comparison of cyberconflicts and the real world, attempting to ascertain what lessons, if any, can be drawn from it. Part I of the Article explores the interests at stake in cyberconflicts and the relationship between technology and the law. Part II uses the French Yahoo! court's decision to show that real-world conceptions of prescriptive jurisdiction retain their legitimacy in cyberspace. Finally, Part III notes that the prospect of near perfect compliance offered by Internet technology provides the opportunity to engineer mature, well-calibrated solutions to international regulatory conflicts, which might then even serve as a model in …
The Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Why The Constitution Should Be Amended To Grant Congress The Power To Legislate In Furtherance Of The General Welfare, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2003), Casey L. Westover
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forum Selection Clauses In Diversity Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (2003), Kendra Johnson Panek
Forum Selection Clauses In Diversity Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (2003), Kendra Johnson Panek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Cleveland State Law Review
This article focuses on the rules for determining finality and appealability of judgments under section 2505.02 and Ohio R. Civ. P. 54(B). To that end, this article addresses not only the various categories of "final orders" but also the procedural mechanisms by which interlocutory appeals are taken from judgments on one part of a case while the rest of the case remains pending. The objective of this article is two-fold. First and foremost, it provides a resource and guide to appellate practitioners and trial court judges for understanding the "final order rule" and for navigating its various provisions in the …
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting U.S. Treaties In Light Of Human Rights Values, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Interpreting U.S. Treaties In Light Of Human Rights Values, Lori Fisler Damrosch
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.