Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Alignment (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Chase national bank (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
-
- Class action (1)
- Consent (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Enemy combatants (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Guantanamo Bay (1)
- Habeas corpus petitions (1)
- Indianapolis (1)
- Injury (1)
- Joinder (1)
- Military force (1)
- New York (1)
- Party alignment (1)
- Policing (1)
- Primary jurisdiction (1)
- Public trials (1)
- Realignment (1)
- Remedy (1)
- Robert Nozick (1)
- State law (1)
- Undercover cases (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Externships, Mariana Hogan, Michael Roffer
Judicial Externships, Mariana Hogan, Michael Roffer
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
What Are The Article Iii Limits To Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction, And Can Parties Consent To Expanded Jurisdiction: Wellness International Network V. Sharif (13-935), Marshall E. Tracht
What Are The Article Iii Limits To Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction, And Can Parties Consent To Expanded Jurisdiction: Wellness International Network V. Sharif (13-935), Marshall E. Tracht
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
Articles & Chapters
In Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 1941, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of realignment, requiring federal courts to examine the issues in dispute and realign each party as plaintiff or defendant if necessary. Due to the complete diversity requirement, realignment gave the federal courts the ability to both create and destroy diversity jurisdiction. Since 1941, the federal courts have struggled to interpret the central holding in Indianapolis, and have created several competing "tests" for realignment. This confusion has made the doctrine of realignment unworkable. Realignment-along with each of the present tests-encourages jurisdictional abuses by forcing the federal courts to …
Rasul V. Bush: Unanswered Questions, Randolph N. Jonakait
Rasul V. Bush: Unanswered Questions, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler
Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Secret Testimony And Public Trials In New York, Randolph N. Jonakait
Secret Testimony And Public Trials In New York, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Relativity Of Injury, Jethro K. Lieberman
The Relativity Of Injury, Jethro K. Lieberman
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Primary Jurisdiction: The Need For Better Court/Agency Interaction, Michael Botein
Primary Jurisdiction: The Need For Better Court/Agency Interaction, Michael Botein
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.