Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
Airdropping Justice: The Constitutionality Of Service Of Process Via Non-Fungible Token, Jenifer Jackson
Airdropping Justice: The Constitutionality Of Service Of Process Via Non-Fungible Token, Jenifer Jackson
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Muskrat Textualism, Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Muskrat Textualism, Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Northwestern University Law Review
The Supreme Court decision McGirt v. Oklahoma, confirming the boundaries of the Creek Reservation in Oklahoma, was a truly rare case in which the Court turned back arguments by federal and state governments in favor of American Indian and tribal interests. For more than a century, Oklahomans had assumed that the reservation had been terminated and acted accordingly. But only Congress can terminate an Indian reservation, and it simply had never done so in the case of the Creek Reservation. Both the majority and dissenting opinions attempted to claim the mantle of textualism, but their respective analyses led to …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Seattle University Law Review
This article introduces the proposal entitled Madison 2.0 which calls for an enlightened federal government to enact legislation—using its broad ability to tax and spend for the general welfare—to revitalize, as opposed to undermine, American federalism. Part I discusses American Federalism today and the need for an updated approach. Part II explores the government's dysfunctional response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Part III proposes how to revitalize American federalism through the Spending Clause. Part IV discusses how to claw back funds in situations of state recalcitrance and replacing funds with a basic income. Lastly, this article concludes by explaining why the …
Black Women And Girls And The Twenty-Sixth Amendment: Constitutional Connections, Activist Intersections, And The First Wave Youth Suffrage Movement, Mae C. Quinn
Seattle University Law Review
On this 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment—and on the cusp of the fiftieth anniversary of the Twenty-sixth Amendment—this article seeks to expand the voting rights canon. It complicates our understanding of voting rights history in the United States, adding layers to the history of federal constitutional enfranchisement and encouraging a more intersectional telling of our suffrage story in the days ahead.
Thus, this work not only seeks to acknowledge the Twenty-sixth Amendment as important constitutional content, as was the goal of the article I wrote with my law student colleagues for a conference held at the University of Akron …
A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen
A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
President Trump’s executive order rescinding federal funds from “sanctuary jurisdictions” has brought a critical, but overlooked, question of constitutional law to the forefront of the political debate: how does the Spending Clause apply to local governments? The purpose of the Spending Clause is to empower the federal government to bargain with the states to enact policies it cannot enact itself. This power, however, is constrained within the confines of federalism. The Supreme Court has sought to restrict the Spending Clause by crafting the Dole-NFIB framework, a test to determine whether a federal grant has compromised federalism. At its …
Fixing Hollingsworth: Standing In Initiative Cases, Karl Manheim, John S. Caragozian, Donald Warner
Fixing Hollingsworth: Standing In Initiative Cases, Karl Manheim, John S. Caragozian, Donald Warner
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
In Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by the “Official Proponents” of California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in California. Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion held that initiative sponsors lack Article III standing to defend their ballot measures even when state officials refuse to defend against constitutional challenges. As a result, Hollingsworth provides state officers with the ability to overrule laws that were intended to bypass the government establishment—in effect, an “executive veto” of popularly-enacted initiatives.
The Article examines this new “executive veto” in depth. It places Hollingsworth in context, discussing the initiative process …
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The State Courts And Federal Constitutional Litigation, Paul M. Bator
The State Courts And Federal Constitutional Litigation, Paul M. Bator
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward Procedural Parity In Constitutional Litigation, Burt Neuborne
Toward Procedural Parity In Constitutional Litigation, Burt Neuborne
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts - 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Suing Municipalities Under 42 U.S.C. 1983: The Impact Of Monell V. Department Of Social Services, Howard M. Klein
Federal Courts - 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Suing Municipalities Under 42 U.S.C. 1983: The Impact Of Monell V. Department Of Social Services, Howard M. Klein
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pennsylvania Long-Arm: An Analytical Justification, Thomas B. Erekson
The Pennsylvania Long-Arm: An Analytical Justification, Thomas B. Erekson
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Resurgence Of The Klaxon Controversy - Contemporary Legal Trends Revitalize An Old Principle, William H. Danne Jr.
A Resurgence Of The Klaxon Controversy - Contemporary Legal Trends Revitalize An Old Principle, William H. Danne Jr.
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judgments Rendered Abroad - State Law Or Federal Law, Albert A. Lindner
Judgments Rendered Abroad - State Law Or Federal Law, Albert A. Lindner
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Advisory Opinions As A Problem Solving Process, David Lenefsky
Advisory Opinions As A Problem Solving Process, David Lenefsky
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments, Various Editors
Federal Power To Regulate Immigration And Judicial Review Of Administrative Orders, Filindo B. Masino
Federal Power To Regulate Immigration And Judicial Review Of Administrative Orders, Filindo B. Masino
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.