Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Agreement (1)
- Arbitral (1)
- Awards (1)
- Beiser (1)
- Citizenship (1)
-
- Comity (1)
- Convention (1)
- Corporate (1)
- Deal (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Defendant-friendly (1)
- Delaware (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disclosure-only (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Federal Arbitration Act (1)
- Federal question (1)
- Fifth Circuit (1)
- Foreign (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisdictional idealism (1)
- Jurisdictional positivism (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Liability (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Merger (1)
- New York (1)
- Plaintiff (1)
- Recognition (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Jurisdictional Idealism And Positivism, John F. Preis
Jurisdictional Idealism And Positivism, John F. Preis
Law Faculty Publications
“If I should call a sheep’s tail a leg, how many legs would it have? Four, because calling a tail a leg would not make it so.” This old quip, often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, captures an issue at the heart of the modern law of subject matter jurisdiction. Some believe that there is a Platonic ideal of jurisdiction that cannot be changed by judicial or legislative fiat. Others take a positivist approach and assert that jurisdiction is nothing more than whatever a legislature says it is. Who is right?
Neither and both. Although neither idealism nor positivism is the …
Rethinking Removal And "Relates To": International Arbitration Disputes And The N.Y. Convention, Holly Wilson
Rethinking Removal And "Relates To": International Arbitration Disputes And The N.Y. Convention, Holly Wilson
University of Richmond Law Review
Part I explores the historical roots of the Convention,
discusses the evolution of its removal provisions, and explains how
it functions in the district courts today. Part II addresses the arguments
in favor of reverting to the Ruhrgas standard. This article
demonstrates that the current judicial interpretation of the Convention's
removal provisions under Beiser is too broad and that the
stricter construction under Ruhrgas should be re-adopted. Part II
examines three key reasons why the current Beiser standard is unworkable:
the current standard (1) leads to absurd results, (2) disrespects
notions of federalism and strains comity, and (3) in conjunction …
In Re Trulia: Revisited And Revitalized, Emma Weiss
In Re Trulia: Revisited And Revitalized, Emma Weiss
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Re Trulia: Revisited And Revitalized, Emma Weiss
In Re Trulia: Revisited And Revitalized, Emma Weiss
Law Student Publications
"After an escalation in deal litigation that culminated with challenges to 95% of $100,000,000 deals, merger objection litigation that ends in disclosure-only settlements has become a topic of great concern. These cases are concerning because it seems implausible that 95% of all mergers are executed carelessly. The problematic cases all follow a similar pattern. When a merger is announced, multiple shareholder plaintiffs challenge the transaction in multiple jurisdictions. Plaintiffs and corporate defendants then quickly agree to a disclosure-only settlement, wherein the plaintiffs receive trivial supplemental disclosures about the transaction. In return, defendants receive a broad release from liability for future …