Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admissions (1)
- Attorneys (1)
- Beliefs and expectations (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Consumer's Union (1)
- Consumers Union v. Veterans Administration (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Disclosure Denied (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Freedom of Information Act (1)
- Juddges (1)
- Judgment (1)
- Judicial Administration (1)
- Judicial Discretion (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- The judicial role (1)
- United Steelworkers v. United States (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court—Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Manly Fleischmann, Ronald H. Jensen
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court—Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Manly Fleischmann, Ronald H. Jensen
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Attempted Appraisal Of An Attempted Appraisal Of The Warren Court, W. Clark Hanna
An Attempted Appraisal Of An Attempted Appraisal Of The Warren Court, W. Clark Hanna
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeach John Marshall (An Attempt Appraisal Of The Warren Court), Gilbert Nurick
Impeach John Marshall (An Attempt Appraisal Of The Warren Court), Gilbert Nurick
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Appraisals Of The Warren Court: Introduction, North Carolina Central Law Review
Two Appraisals Of The Warren Court: Introduction, North Carolina Central Law Review
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Discretion And The Freedom Of Information Act: Disclosure Denied: Consumers Union V. Veterans Administration, Judith A. Mitnick
Judicial Discretion And The Freedom Of Information Act: Disclosure Denied: Consumers Union V. Veterans Administration, Judith A. Mitnick
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Haynsworth Affair Reconsidered: The Significance Of Conflicting Perceptions Of The Judicial Role, Edward N. Beiser
The Haynsworth Affair Reconsidered: The Significance Of Conflicting Perceptions Of The Judicial Role, Edward N. Beiser
Vanderbilt Law Review
Between 1900 and 1968, the Senate had refused to confirm an appointee to the Supreme Court on only one occasion. Then, within a two year period, the Senate twice refused to confirm an appointment: Associate Justice Abe Fortas, nominated as Chief Justice in 1968, was never acted upon because of a Senate filibuster,and his name was withdrawn; and Judge Clement Haynsworth, whose nomination provoked a great deal of debate and controversy, was ultimately rejected by the Senate by a vote of 55 to 45. These two incidents marked a distinct change from the traditional custom of Senatorial acquiescence to Presidential …
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Study Of The Assignment Of Judges To Criminal Cases In Allegheny County - The Poor Fare Worse, R. Stanton Wettick Jr.
A Study Of The Assignment Of Judges To Criminal Cases In Allegheny County - The Poor Fare Worse, R. Stanton Wettick Jr.
Duquesne Law Review
No abstract provided.