Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial independence (3)
- Judicial appointment (2)
- Judicial conduct (2)
- Judicial elections (2)
- Judicial ethics (2)
-
- Baker v. Carr (1)
- Chief Justice Roberts (1)
- Clemency Power (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Diversity in the workplace (1)
- Ethnic groups (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal Bench (1)
- Federal Pardon Power (1)
- Federal judges (1)
- Georgia (1)
- John G. Roberts (1)
- Jr. (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Personality (1)
- Judicial appointments (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Judicial pay (1)
- Judicial process (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial selection (1)
- Judicial statistics (1)
- Justices (1)
- Kentucky (1)
- Latino critical theory (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Only Skin Deep?: The Cost Of Partisan Politics On Minority Diversity Of The Federal Bench, Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas
Only Skin Deep?: The Cost Of Partisan Politics On Minority Diversity Of The Federal Bench, Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Latinos and Latinas at the Epicenter of Contemporary Legal Discourses. Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, March 2007.
Limiting The Federal Pardon Power, Kristen H. Fowler
Limiting The Federal Pardon Power, Kristen H. Fowler
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray
The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Back To The Beginning: An Essay On The Court, The Law Of Democracy, And Trust, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Back To The Beginning: An Essay On The Court, The Law Of Democracy, And Trust, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The law of democracy is in a state of incoherence. The experiment begun by Baker v. Carr showed great promise yet soon gave way to disappointment. The promise was one of modest review and respect for political choices made elsewhere. A presumption was still against judicial involvement: absent self-entrenchment or distrust of political outcomes, the Court would stay its hand. But, the reality has been far from that. The presumption has now clearly shifted, and the Court intervenes in politically-charged controversies as a matter of course. This raises a question at the heart of the law of democracy: can we …
Straddling The Fence Between Truth And Pretense: The Role Of Law And Preference In Judicial Decision Making And The Future Of Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
Straddling The Fence Between Truth And Pretense: The Role Of Law And Preference In Judicial Decision Making And The Future Of Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Methods Of Judicial Selection And Their Impact On Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
Methods Of Judicial Selection And Their Impact On Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Endless Judicial Selection Debate And Why It Matters For Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
The Endless Judicial Selection Debate And Why It Matters For Judicial Independence, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this overview, I begin by describing the five different systems of state judicial selection that have evolved out of a perennial struggle to strike an optimal balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability. I then explore recent developments that have intensified that struggle, before analyzing, with reference to available research, how different selection systems counter or accommodate such developments. My purpose here is not to write (another) position piece. Rather, my purpose is to step back and contextualize disputes over judicial selection with reference to the independence and accountability issues that animate them, and to isolate what we know …
Working Class Judges, William D. Henderson, Christopher J. Zorn, Jason J. Czarnezki
Working Class Judges, William D. Henderson, Christopher J. Zorn, Jason J. Czarnezki
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In recent years, a steady chorus of dignitaries has decried the low pay of federal judges and suggested that the federal judiciary is on the brink of losing its best and its brightest. The persistent nature of these claims should give us pause. Scott Baker's recent study empirically evaluates these claims by examining the relationship between judicial salaries and the work habits and voting patterns of federal appellate judges. If large pay disparities are indeed eroding the quality of the federal bench, Baker theorizes this likely results in more ideological voting, fewer dissents, longer delays in issuing opinions, and a …
Navigating The New Politics Of Judicial Appointments, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
Navigating The New Politics Of Judicial Appointments, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Review Essay explores the new politics of judicial appointments by addressing the important question whether Senate-specific reforms to the judicial appointments process are likely to succeed. In his recent book, The Next Justice, Chris Eisgruber proposes a two-part plan to repair the Supreme Court appointments process. Like many other scholars that have written in the area, Eisgruber's reforms focus primarily on the Senate. First, he proposes that the Senate get smart by asking penetrating questions about the judicial philosophy of Supreme Court nominees in an effort to ensure that the future Justices are moderates, rather than extremists. Second, he …