Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

International Trade Law

Seattle University Law Review

NAFTA

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Nafta And The Changing Role Of State Government In A Global Economy: Will The Nafta Federal-State Consultation Process Preserve State Sovereignty?, A.J. Tangeman Jan 1996

Nafta And The Changing Role Of State Government In A Global Economy: Will The Nafta Federal-State Consultation Process Preserve State Sovereignty?, A.J. Tangeman

Seattle University Law Review

Both state and federal leaders will need to work together to preserve state sovereignty in the face of challenges posed by trade agreements. Greater federal-state communication will balance the struggle between the federal government's goal in promoting free trade and individual state governments' interests in protecting their sovereignty. Part II of this Comment examines the federalist principles that influence the existing federal-state framework of authority. Part II also discusses the federal government's constitutional authority over state compliance with U.S. trade obligations and whether states have any constitutional or legal authority to demand more autonomy in conducting their trade and commerce. …


Free Trade As An Extremist Ideology: The Case Of Nafta, Robert W. Benson Jan 1994

Free Trade As An Extremist Ideology: The Case Of Nafta, Robert W. Benson

Seattle University Law Review

This article purports that free tradism has become such a classic extremist ideology, just as, until recently, Marxism-Leninism was. Free tradism is fairly described as fitting the two criteria that characterize extremist ideologies: (1) their adherents are oblivious to cognitive dissonance contradicting their analyses, and (2) their adherents are willing to plunge themselves and others into great risks in the name of the ideology. This article adduces evidence in these two categories, using NAFTA as an example, analyzing concrete issues of trade theory, jobs, the environment, human rights, and democracy.


Preface, Geoffrey R. Watson Jan 1994

Preface, Geoffrey R. Watson

Seattle University Law Review

This issue includes one article from each panel: Professor Clarke's article on whether China should become a member of the GATT, Professor Benson's article on NAFTA as "extremist ideology," Mr. Kawachi's article on securitization in Japan, and Professor Green's article on MFN status for China. In addition, the editors have included a spirited defense of NAFTA by Ms. Rebecca Reynolds Bannister. To set the stage, I offer a few comments on each article below.


The Mexican Market And Nafta, Rebecca Reynolds Bannister Jan 1994

The Mexican Market And Nafta, Rebecca Reynolds Bannister

Seattle University Law Review

In the face of European integration and strategic partnerships in the Pacific Rim, it is vitally important for the United States to strengthen our ties with our North American commercial partners and with the rest of the Western Hemisphere. NAFTA is an historic agreement. It is an ambitious effort to eliminate barriers to agricultural, manufacturing, and services trade, to remove investment restrictions, and to protect intellectual property rights. And, NAFTA is the first agreement in the history of U.S. trade policy that directly addresses envi- ronmental concerns. United States' strategic policy must be focused on that which builds security for …