Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Cabin Creek Coal Mine controversy (2)
- Canadian-U.S. International Joint Commission (2)
- Clean Water Act (2)
- Compacts (2)
- Controversies (2)
-
- Endangered Species Act (2)
- Equitable apportionment doctrine (2)
- Federal Power Act (2)
- Federal-state relations (2)
- Fish and wildlife (2)
- Flood control (2)
- Indian treaty rights (2)
- Instream flows (2)
- International norms (2)
- Interstate conflicts (2)
- Intra-federal relations (2)
- Montana (2)
- Recreation (2)
- Water (2)
- Water allocation decisions (2)
- Act (1)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Allocation (1)
- American Society of International Law Proceedings (1)
- Appropriating groundwater (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Arizona v. California (1)
- Arkansas River Compact (1)
- Arkansas River controversy (1)
- Basin authority (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Colorado River Basin Authority: Opportunity For Sharing River Basin Management And Resources, David H. Getches
A Colorado River Basin Authority: Opportunity For Sharing River Basin Management And Resources, David H. Getches
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
32 pages.
Contains references.
Allocation And Use Of International Rivers: Recent Developments In International Law, Daniel Barstow Magraw
Allocation And Use Of International Rivers: Recent Developments In International Law, Daniel Barstow Magraw
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
26 pages.
Contains references.
The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground For International, National, And Interstate Controversies, John U. Carlson
The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground For International, National, And Interstate Controversies, John U. Carlson
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
38 pages.
Contains references.
Interjurisdictional Relations Under Federal Water Quality Law: A Guide Through The Maze, Michael C. Blumm, Daniel Rohlf
Interjurisdictional Relations Under Federal Water Quality Law: A Guide Through The Maze, Michael C. Blumm, Daniel Rohlf
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
53 pages.
Contains references.
Allocating Groundwater Among Nations, States And Tribes, Ann Berkley Rodgers, Carolyn J. Abeita
Allocating Groundwater Among Nations, States And Tribes, Ann Berkley Rodgers, Carolyn J. Abeita
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
70 pages.
Agenda: Boundaries And Water: Allocation And Use Of A Shared Resource, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Boundaries And Water: Allocation And Use Of A Shared Resource, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Charles F. Wilkinson.
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource is the topic of the Center's annual summer program on water this June. Most of the major rivers in the western United States are shared between two or more states. Often tribal governments play an important role in water allocation and use decisions. International considerations also may be involved in some cases. These interjurisdictional issues extend to groundwater as well as surface water.
This conference will provide the …
Current Developments Concerning The Settlement Of Disputes Involving States By Arbitration And The World Court – Remarks By Lori Fisler Damrosch, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Current Developments Concerning The Settlement Of Disputes Involving States By Arbitration And The World Court – Remarks By Lori Fisler Damrosch, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
Our moderator has asked me to talk about the dialogue between the United States and the Soviet Union. With respect to the general contours of the U.S. proposal, I think it is a very constructive one. I do support it, and I urge you all to study it, comment upon it, and try to improve it to take it a bit further. The main feature of it that I want to mention today is the idea of affirmative enumeration of categories of disputes that would be submitted to the Court for jurisdiction as opposed to the historical approach of accepting …