Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Crimes against humanity (2)
- International Criminal Court (2)
- Pre-Trial Chamber II (2)
- Proprio motu prosecutorial investigations (2)
- State or organizational policy (2)
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeals Chamber (1)
- Article 17 (1)
- Article 19 (1)
- Article7(2)(a) of the Rome Statute (1)
- Authorization (1)
- Charles Jalloh (1)
- Charles Taylor (1)
- Contextual elements of crimes against humanity (1)
- Contribution of Special Court for Sierra Leone (1)
- Decision on the authorization of an investigation in Kenya (1)
- Head of state immunity (1)
- Hybrid courts (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- International criminal courts (1)
- International criminal tribunals (1)
- International intellectual property agreements (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Kenya (1)
- Powers of the United Nations Security Council (1)
- Proactive complementarity (1)
- Rome Statute (1)
- Special Court for Sierra Leone (1)
- Trade agreements (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Kenya Vs. The Icc Prosecutor, Charles Chernor Jalloh
Kenya Vs. The Icc Prosecutor, Charles Chernor Jalloh
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
International Decision, International Criminal Court, Judgment On The Appeal Of The Republic Of Kenya Against Pre-Trial Chamber Decision Denying Inadmissibility Of The Kenya Situation, Charles Chernor Jalloh
International Decision, International Criminal Court, Judgment On The Appeal Of The Republic Of Kenya Against Pre-Trial Chamber Decision Denying Inadmissibility Of The Kenya Situation, Charles Chernor Jalloh
Faculty Publications
A fundamental pillar of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is Article 17, which enshrines the complementarity principle – the idea that ICC jurisdiction will only be triggered when states fail to act to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes within their national courts or in circumstances where they prove unwilling and or unable to do so. The problem is that, as shown in this case report in the American Journal of International Law on the first ICC Appeals Chamber ruling regarding a state party’s objection to the court’s assertion of jurisdiction over its nationals, …
Africa And The International Criminal Court: Collision Course Or Cooperation?, Charles Chernor Jalloh
Africa And The International Criminal Court: Collision Course Or Cooperation?, Charles Chernor Jalloh
Faculty Publications
The relationship between Africa and the International Criminal Court (ICC) was cordial for many years. However, since the decisions of the United Nations Security Council to invoke its special powers to impose the Court on Sudan and Libya, African States acting through their regional body - the African Union - have adopted numerous resolutions claiming that the ICC maybe impeding, rather than assisting, their efforts to restore peace in several ongoing conflicts and transitional situations on the continent. In this invited lecture, given as the first RJR Distinguished Visiting Professor Lecture at North Carolina Central University School of Law in …
Value Divergence In Global Intellectual Property Law, J. Janewa Oseitutu
Value Divergence In Global Intellectual Property Law, J. Janewa Oseitutu
Faculty Publications
It is a challenge for the United States to adequately protect the interests of its intellectual property industries, especially when U.S. interests are not in line with the social, cultural, and economic goals of other nations. Yet, as a major exporter of intellectual property protected goods, the U.S. has an interest in negotiating effective international intellectual property agreements that are perceived to be legitimate by the state signatories and their constituents. Focusing on value divergence, this article contributes to the growing body of literature on developing a robust but flexible global intellectual property system, arguing that the trade-based approach to …