Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
International trade; National treatment principle; Dispute settlement; Food law; Administrative Law; Consumer protection; Labeling; Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Us–Cool: How The Appellate Body Misconstrued The National Treatment Principle, Severely Restricting Agency Discretion To Promulgate Mandatory, Pro-Consumer Labeling Rules, Juscelino F. Colares, William P. Canterberry
Us–Cool: How The Appellate Body Misconstrued The National Treatment Principle, Severely Restricting Agency Discretion To Promulgate Mandatory, Pro-Consumer Labeling Rules, Juscelino F. Colares, William P. Canterberry
Faculty Publications
In United States–Certain Country of Origin Labeling Requirements, the Appellate Body ("AB") of the World Trade Organization ("WTO") ruled that the United States' country-of-origin labeling regulations ("COOL") on beef and pork products violated the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade's ("TBT") National Treatment ("NT") Principle. Aimed at promoting informed consumer choice, COOL required retailers to disclose the covered products' origin. In prior decisions under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ("GATT") art. III:4, the AB correctly rejected protectionist rules that unnecessarily encumbered consumer choice by adversely affecting conditions of competition for imports. In US–COOL, however, the AB …