Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (3)
- Berne Convention (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- Enablement (2)
- Invention (2)
-
- ASCAP (1)
- Agreement on trade (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Collective management (1)
- Conception (1)
- Consent decrees (1)
- Digital copyright (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Electronic information resources (1)
- Formalities (1)
- Golan (1)
- Google Book Settlement (1)
- Implementation (1)
- Impossible inventions (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Law of operability (1)
- Most favored nation (1)
- Novelty (1)
- Operability (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent law gate keeping (1)
- Possession (1)
- Prior Art (1)
- Priority (1)
- Public domain (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Patently Impossible, Sean B. Seymore
Patently Impossible, Sean B. Seymore
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The quest to achieve the impossible fuels creativity, spawns new fields of inquiry, illuminates old ones, and extends the frontiers of knowledge. It is difficult, however, to obtain a patent for an invention which seems impossible, incredible, or conflicts with well-established scientific principles. The principal patentability hurdle is operability, which an inventor cannot overcome if there is reason to doubt that the invention can really achieve the intended result. Despite its laudable gatekeeping role, this Article identifies two problems with the law of operability. First, though objective in theory, the operability analysis rests on subjective credibility assessments. These credibility assessments …
Rethinking Novelty In Patent Law, Sean B. Seymore
Rethinking Novelty In Patent Law, Sean B. Seymore
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The novelty requirement seeks to ensure that a patent will not issue if the public already possesses the invention. Although gauging possession is usually straightforward for simple inventions, it can be difficult for those in complex fields like biotechnology, chemistry, and pharmaceuticals. For example, if a drug company seeks to patent a promising molecule that was disclosed but never physically made in the prior art, the key possession question is whether a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) could have made it at the time of the prior disclosure. Put differently, could the PHOSITA rely on then-existing knowledge …
Golan V. Holder: A Look At The Constraints Imposed By The Berne Convention, Daniel J. Gervais
Golan V. Holder: A Look At The Constraints Imposed By The Berne Convention, Daniel J. Gervais
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
One of the central issues in the Golan v. Holder litigation is the extent to which the United States had flexibility to tailor the protection of existing works that had fallen in the public domain when it joined the Berne Convention. This Essay argues that the Berne Convention obligates the United States as a Berne Union member to provide some degree of protection, but otherwise leaves wide latitude to set the conditions under which works in the public domain receive retroactive copyright protection. The Convention itself does not mandate that any particular level of protection be granted to such works …
The Google Book Settlement And The Trips Agreement, Daniel J. Gervais
The Google Book Settlement And The Trips Agreement, Daniel J. Gervais
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The proposed amended settlement in the Google Book case has been the focus of numerous comments and critiques. This "perspective" reviews the compatibility of the proposed settlement with the TRIPS Agreement and relevant provisions of the Berne Convention that were incorporated into TRIPS, in particular the no-formality rule, the most-favored nation (MFN) clause, national treatment obligations, and the so-called three-step test.
Atypical Inventions, Sean B. Seymore
Atypical Inventions, Sean B. Seymore
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Patent law is constantly evolving to accommodate advances in science and technology. But, for a variety of reasons, some aspects of patent doctrine have not evolved over time leading to a growing disconnect between the patent system and certain technical communities. Particularly vulnerable to the ill effects of this disconnect are "atypical" inventions, which this Article definesas those in which either (1) a technical aspect of the invention or the inventive process does not conform to an established legal standard in patent law or (2) the technical underpinnings of the invention depart from well-established scientific paradigms. An example of the …
The Landscape Of Collective Management Schemes, Daniel J. Gervais
The Landscape Of Collective Management Schemes, Daniel J. Gervais
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Collective management comes in many shapes and sizes. There is, however, an interesting definition proposed by WIPO: [T]he term “collective management” only refers to those forms of joint exercise of rights where there are truly “collectivized” aspects (such as tariffs, licensing conditions and distribution rules); where there is an organized community behind it; where the management is carried out on behalf of such a community; and where the organization serves collective objectives beyond merely carrying out the tasks of rights management . . . . In contrast, “rights clearance organizations” are those which perform joint exercise of rights without any …