Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Who Owns "The Law"? The Effect On Copyrights When Privately-Authored Works Are Adopted Or Enacted By Reference Into Law, Katie M. Colendich
Who Owns "The Law"? The Effect On Copyrights When Privately-Authored Works Are Adopted Or Enacted By Reference Into Law, Katie M. Colendich
Washington Law Review
The law," including judicial opinions and statutes, is not copyrightable because neither individuals nor organizations own the law. This longstanding principle is supported by the public's due process right to access the law. The United States Supreme Court has never determined the status of a private organization's copyright on model codes or standards when a legislature adopts those materials into law. Federal courts have taken several different approaches to resolving this issue; however, their decisions are in direct conflict with each other. The Second and Ninth Circuits permit private authors to retain copyrights of materials subsequently enacted into law, while …
The Experimental Use Exception In Japan: A Model For U.S. Patent Law?, Jennifer A. Johnson
The Experimental Use Exception In Japan: A Model For U.S. Patent Law?, Jennifer A. Johnson
Washington International Law Journal
The patent laws of the United States and Japan contain provisions that permit the experimental use of patented inventions. In the United States, the common law experimental use exception has been utilized to permit the use of a patented invention to satisfy intellectual curiosity, as long as the use is not commercial. In 1984, the Hatch-Waxman Act provided a statutory experimental use exception in 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1). It amended the Patent Act to allow a generic drug company to experiment with a pioneer drug during the pioneer drug's patent term to generate data for obtaining regulatory approval. In contrast, …
The Experimental Use Exception In Japan: A Model For U.S. Patent Law?, Jennifer A. Johnson
The Experimental Use Exception In Japan: A Model For U.S. Patent Law?, Jennifer A. Johnson
Washington International Law Journal
The patent laws of the United States and Japan contain provisions that permit the experimental use of patented inventions. In the United States, the common law experimental use exception has been utilized to permit the use of a patented invention to satisfy intellectual curiosity, as long as the use is not commercial. In 1984, the Hatch-Waxman Act provided a statutory experimental use exception in 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1). It amended the Patent Act to allow a generic drug company to experiment with a pioneer drug during the pioneer drug's patent term to generate data for obtaining regulatory approval. In contrast, …
Protection Of Artists' Rights Under The Korean Copyright Law, Chung Hwan Choi, Minsu Kyeong
Protection Of Artists' Rights Under The Korean Copyright Law, Chung Hwan Choi, Minsu Kyeong
Washington International Law Journal
The term "artists" includes film, television ("TV"), stage, and musical actors and actresses ("actors"), pop singers and musicians, dancers, fashion models, and classical musicians. Although the same analysis can be applied to all of the categories above mentioned, this article solely focuses on pop singers and actors. The Copyright Act of Korea ("Copyright Act") defines Siryun ("public performance") as the entertainment activities of artists, and uses Siryunja ("performer") instead of "entertainer" as a legal term for artists.