Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abstraction filtration comparison test (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Consent decree (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
-
- Copyright litigation (1)
- DOJ (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
- Empirical study (1)
- Extrinsic intrinsic test (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Industry (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Licensing (1)
- MMA (1)
- Music (1)
- Music Modernization Act (1)
- Music copyright (1)
- Music rights (1)
- Music royalties (1)
- Music streaming (1)
- Ordinary observer test (1)
- PRO (1)
- Performance rights organization (1)
- Right of Publicity (1)
- Streaming (1)
- Substantial similarity (1)
- Video Games (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Songwriters V. Spotify: Is Spotify The Problem Or A Symptom Of The Problem?, Mariana L. Orbay
Songwriters V. Spotify: Is Spotify The Problem Or A Symptom Of The Problem?, Mariana L. Orbay
Pepperdine Law Review
Today, streaming is the prevailing mode of music consumption. Yet, streaming services are struggling to turn a profit, as songwriters also face significant financial challenges in the streaming era. All the while, record labels are collecting the majority of streaming revenue and seeing record profits. The 2018 Music Modernization Act attempted to address songwriters’ and streaming services’ financial problems by altering the factors considered by the Copyright Royalty Board in determining the mechanical royalty rates owed by streaming platforms to songwriters. A proper application of this newly instated factor test necessitates considering both songwriters’ and streaming services’ business operations and …
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, Daryl Lim
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, Daryl Lim
Pepperdine Law Review
Copyright litigation involving hit songs like Robin Thicke’s “Blurred Lines,” Justin Bieber and Usher’s “Somebody to Love,” and Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway to Heaven” caused many in the music industry to vex over the line between homage and infringement. When are the two works too similar? To many courts and scholars, substantial similarity is “bizarre,” “ad hoc,” and “a virtual black hole in copyright jurisprudence.” Every creative work borrows some inspiration from other works, whether copyrighted or not. Judging when defendants appropriated too much is an inherently opaque and subjective enterprise, but unraveling its mysteries is critical for the flourishing of …
Protecting The First Amendment Rights Of Video Games From Lanham Act And Right Of Publicity Claims, Yen-Shyang Tseng
Protecting The First Amendment Rights Of Video Games From Lanham Act And Right Of Publicity Claims, Yen-Shyang Tseng
Pepperdine Law Review
In 2013 and 2015, the Ninth Circuit decided two nearly identical cases in which professional football players alleged a video game publisher used their likenesses without authorization in a game that simulates real football games. One plaintiff brought a false endorsement claim under the Lanham Act, while others brought state law right of publicity claims. That made all the difference. The Ninth Circuit found the First Amendment protected the game against the false endorsement claim, but not against the right of publicity claims. These contradictory results stem from court’s application of the Rogers v. Grimaldi test to Lanham Act claims …
The Music Industry: Drowning In The Stream, Jonathan Croskrey
The Music Industry: Drowning In The Stream, Jonathan Croskrey
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The Department of Justice is reviewing two of it's oldest consent decrees, which were entered into with ASCAP and BMI. ASCAP and BMI are the two original performing rights organizations and existed well before streaming. This article analyzes copyright and antirust law through the lens of modern technology and the current landscape of the music industry. It examines whether the consent decrees should be removed or modified and what the consequences of each would be.