Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Paradox Of Source Code Secrecy, Sonia K. Katyal
The Paradox Of Source Code Secrecy, Sonia K. Katyal
Cornell Law Review
In Lear v. Adkins, the Supreme Court precipitously wrote, "federal law requires that all ideas in general circulation be dedicated to the common good unless they are protected by a valid patent." Today, it is clear that trade secrecy's dominance over source code has been a significant cause for concern in cases involving the public interest. To protect civil rights in the age of automated decision making, I argue, we must limit opportunities for seclusion in areas of intellectual property, criminal justice, and governance more generally. The solution, therefore, does not require a complete overhaul of the existing system, but …
How Essential Are Standard-Essential Patents?, Mark A. Lemley, Timothy Simcoe
How Essential Are Standard-Essential Patents?, Mark A. Lemley, Timothy Simcoe
Cornell Law Review
In this study, we explore what happens when Standard-Essential Patents (SEPs) go to court. What we found surprised us. We expected that proving infringement of SEPs would be easy-they are, after all, supposed to be essential-but that the breadth of the patents might make them invalid. In fact, the evidence shows the opposite. SEPs are more likely to be held valid than a matched set of litigated non-SEP patents, but they are significantly less likely to be infringed. SEPs, then, don't seem to be all that essential, at least when they make it to court.