Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 2nd Circuit US Circuit Court of Appeals; 9th Circuit; 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals; Ape; Art; Authentication; Authenticity; BAYC; Birkin; Bitcoin; Bitcoin Blockchain; Blockchain; Blockchain Technology; Bored Ape Yacht Club; Brand Identity; Branding; Brand Protection; Business; Businesses; California; Central District of California; Civil Law; Classification; Collectibles; Commerce; Common Law; Consumer Confusion; Crypto; Cryptocurrency; CryptoPunk; CryptoPunks; Digital; Digital Age; Digital Assets; Digital Database; Digital Collectibles; Double Identity; Ethereum; Ethereum Blockchain; EU; EUIPO; Europe; European Union; European Union Intellectual Property Office; European Union Trade Mark; European Union Trade Mark Regulation; EUTM; EUTMR; Fair Competition; Federal Court; First Amendment; First to use; First to file; Global; Globalization; Hermes; Infringement; Innovation; Intellectual Property; Intent-to-Use; Internet; IP; Lanham; Lanham Act; Likelihood of Confusion; Litigation; Madrid Agreement; Madrid Protocol; Mark; Mason Rothschild; Metadata; MetaBirkin; MetaBirkins; Metaverse; Mint; Minted; Minting; New York; NFT; NFTs; Nice Classification; Nike; Non-Fungible Token; Non-Fungible Tokens; Ownership; Paris Convention; PFP; PFP NFT; Registered Marks; Regulation (EU) 2017/100; Regulation 2017/1001; Rothschild; RR/BAYC; Ryder Ripps; Satoshi Nakamoto; SDNY; Smart Contract; Sneaker; Southern District of New York; StockX; Technology; TM; TMs; Token; Tokens; Tokenization; Token ID; Trade; Trade-Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement; Trademark; Trademark Act; Trademark Cases; Trademark Infringement; Trademark Registration; TRIPS; TRIPS Agreement; United States; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Unregistered Marks; US; USPTO; Vault NFT; Virtual goods; WIPO; World Intellectual Property Organization; Yuga; Yuga Labs (1)
- Artificial Intelligence; Intellectual Property; Patent Law; Copyright Law; DABUS; Stephen Thaler; Innovation; Generative AI; Federal Circuit; United States Patent and Trademark Office; United States Copyright Office; Congress; Digiwork; Patent; Copyright; IP; Authorship (1)
- Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Facial Recognition; Right of Publicity; Privacy; Surveillance; Technology (1)
- Deepfake; Artificial Intelligence; Media Manipulation; Convention on Cybercrime; Budapest Convention; Synthetic Media; Data Protection; General Data Protection Regulation; National Defense Authorization Act; Misinformation; Disinformation; Machine Learning; Generative Adversarial Network; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Universal Declaration of Human Rights; First Amendment; Human Rights Law; Intellectual Property Law; International Law; Internet Law; Legislation; National Security Law; Privacy Law (1)
- Publishing; Morals Clauses; Moral Turpitude; Contracts; Books; First Amendment; Authors; Cancel Culturel; Reverse Morals Clauses; Entertainment; Free Speech (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Trademark Infringement: The Likelihood Of Confusion Of Nfts In The Us And Eu, Sara Sachs
Trademark Infringement: The Likelihood Of Confusion Of Nfts In The Us And Eu, Sara Sachs
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The immutability of non-fungible tokens has made it an invaluable tool for asset ownership and authentication across a variety of industries. With the proliferation of NFTs comes the need to protect trademarks and prevent consumer confusion in the digital age. This Note explores the existing legal framework for trademark law in the United States and European Union. This Note argues for a new trademark standard that reflects the interconnected nature of a global digital society.
Rise Of The Machines: The Future Of Intellectual Property Rights In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence, Sofia Vescovo
Rise Of The Machines: The Future Of Intellectual Property Rights In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence, Sofia Vescovo
Brooklyn Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is not new to generating outputs considered suitable for intellectual property (IP) protection. However, recent technological advancements have made it possible for AI to transform from a mere tool used to assist in developing IP to the mind behind novel artistic works and inventions. One particular AI, DABUS, has done just so. Yet, while technology has advanced, IP law has not. This note sets out to provide a solution to the legal concerns raised by AI in IP law, specifically in the context of AI authorship and inventorship. The DABUS test case offers a model framework for …
Deep Dive Into Deepfakes—Safeguarding Our Digital Identity, Yi Yan
Deep Dive Into Deepfakes—Safeguarding Our Digital Identity, Yi Yan
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Deepfake technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated, and with it, the potential to pose a significant threat to the digital community, democratic institutions, and private individuals. With the creation of highly convincing but entirely fabricated audio, video, and images, there is a pressing need for the international community to address the vulnerabilities posed by deepfake technology in the current legal landscape through unambiguous legislation. This Note explores the ethical, legal, and social implications of deepfakes, including issues of privacy, identity theft, and political manipulation. It also reviews existing international legal frameworks, i.e., the Convention on Cybercrime (“Budapest Convention”) and proposes a …
The Right Of Publicity: A New Framework For Regulating Facial Recognition, Jason M. Schultz
The Right Of Publicity: A New Framework For Regulating Facial Recognition, Jason M. Schultz
Brooklyn Law Review
For over a century, the right of publicity (ROP) has protected individuals from unwanted commercial exploitation of their identities. Originating around the turn of the twentieth century in response to the newest image-appropriation technologies of the time, including portrait photography, mass-production packaging, and a ubiquitous printing press, the ROP has continued to evolve along with each new wave of technologies that enable companies to exploit peoples’ images and identities for commercial gain. Over time, the ROP has protected identities from misappropriation in photographs, films, advertisements, action figures, baseball cards, animatronic robots, video game avatars, and even digital resurrection in film …
Frustrating Morals: Is There An Implied Reverse Morals Clause In Publishing Agreements?, Matthew L. Fulton
Frustrating Morals: Is There An Implied Reverse Morals Clause In Publishing Agreements?, Matthew L. Fulton
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In response to the #MeToo movement and the widespread condemnation of public figures for misconduct, book publishers adopted a standard contract provision used in other entertainment industries called a morals clause. Morals clauses allow a publisher to terminate the agreement if the author is subject to public condemnation. Although these provisions provide robust protection for publishers, these one-sided clauses provide no such protection for authors if publishers are subject to similar condemnation. Although authors may not have the leverage to negotiate reciprocal morals clauses, some authors may have an implied reverse morals clause through the frustration of purpose defense to …
Trump Really Is Too Small: The Right To Trademark Political Commentary, Samuel F. Ernst
Trump Really Is Too Small: The Right To Trademark Political Commentary, Samuel F. Ernst
Brooklyn Law Review
Can you register a famous person’s name as your trademark? The Lanham Act seems to say no, and the PTO interprets this to mean, no, never, no matter what. The Federal Circuit says, “yes, you can,” at least as applied to marks containing political commentary. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent….” Earlier this year the Federal Circuit declared this law unconstitutional in violation of the First Amendment, …
Data Property, Christina Mulligan, James Grimmelmann
Data Property, Christina Mulligan, James Grimmelmann
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.