Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (5)
- Intellectual property (5)
- Fair use (3)
- Free software (3)
- Innovation (3)
-
- Patent (3)
- Android (2)
- Creative Commons (2)
- Google (2)
- Java (2)
- Open source (2)
- Oracle (2)
- Public domain (2)
- Software (2)
- Anticommons (1)
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Copyright trolls (1)
- Copyright; patent trolls; intellectual property theory (1)
- Digital copyright (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- First-sale doctrine (1)
- First-sale rights (1)
- IP (1)
- Kirtsaeng (1)
- Licensing (1)
- Non-Practicing Entities (1)
- Open source software (1)
- Patent Assertion (1)
- Patent Assertion Entities (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Transformative Use In Software, Clark D. Asay
Transformative Use In Software, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Fair use is copyright law’s most important defense against claims of copyright infringement. It provides courts with an equitable tool for allowing parties to use the copyrighted materials of others without liability when doing so facilitates copyright’s constitutional purpose of promoting the “progress of Science and the useful Arts.”
When analyzing fair use, modern courts place great emphasis on whether the purportedly fair use involves a “transformative use” of the copyrighted materials. In what some are calling the most important software copyright case in decades, a jury recently handed Google a victory by concluding that Google’s reuse of some of …
Patent Pacifism, Clark D. Asay
Patent Pacifism, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Over the last decade, much of the patent law literature has focused on the problem of “patent trolls,” or patent owners who don’t make products, but sue others that do. The basic complaint against these types of entities is that they impose a tax on innovation without providing offsetting societal benefits. Furthermore, their patent assertions have been on the rise, with a significant percentage of patent suits now attributable to them. In short, the troll phenomenon suggests a problem of excessive patent assertions.
But despite the importance of the troll phenomenon, the fact remains that most patents are never asserted, …
Software's Copyright Anticommons, Clark D. Asay
Software's Copyright Anticommons, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Scholars have long assessed “anticommons” problems in creative and innovative environments. An anticommons develops when an asset has numerous rights holders, each of which has a right to prevent use of the asset, but none of which has a right to use the asset without authorization from the other rights holders. Hence, when any one of those rights holders uses its rights in ways that inhibit use of the common asset, an anticommons may result.
In the software world, scholars have long argued that anticommons problems arise, if at all, because of patent rights. Copyright, on the other hand, has …
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Traditionally, patent and copyright laws have been viewed as separate bodies of law with distinct utilitarian goals. The conventional wisdom holds that patent law aims to incentivize the production of inventive ideas, while copyright focuses on protecting the original expression of ideas, but not the underlying ideas themselves. This customary divide between patent and copyright laws finds some support in the Constitution’s Intellectual Property Clause, and Congress, courts, and scholars have largely perpetuated it in enacting, interpreting, and analyzing copyright and patent laws over time.
In this Article, I argue that it is time to partially breach this traditional divide. …
The Psychology Of Patent Protection, Stephanie Plamondon Bair
The Psychology Of Patent Protection, Stephanie Plamondon Bair
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the major justifications for our patent system using a behavioral psychology framework. Applying insights from the behavioral literature that I argue more accurately account for the realities of human action than previous analytical tools, I critically evaluate each of the major justifications for patents — incentive theory, disclosure theory, prospect theory, commercialization theory, patent racing theory, and non-utilitarian theories. I ask whether our current patent system is an effective regime for meeting the stated goals of these accounts. When the answer to this question is no, I again turn to the behavioral …
Copyright's Technological Interdependencies, Clark D. Asay
Copyright's Technological Interdependencies, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Copyright was initially conceptualized as a means to free creative parties from dependency on public and private patrons such as monarchs, churches, and well-to-do private citizens. By achieving independence for creative parties, the theory ran, copyright led to greater production of a more diverse set of creative works.
But this lingering conception of copyright is both inaccurate and harmful. It is inaccurate because, in today’s world, creative parties are increasingly dependent upon “Technological Patronage” from the likes of Google, Amazon, Apple, and others. Thus, rather than being alternatives or adversaries, copyright and Technological Patronage are increasingly interdependent in facilitating both …
Ex-Post Incentives And Ip In Garcia V. Google And Beyond, Clark D. Asay
Ex-Post Incentives And Ip In Garcia V. Google And Beyond, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, I articulate a theory for why the outcome in the Ninth Circuit's recent Garcia v. Google copyright decision is wrong. I apply the same theory to explain the problem with patent assertion entities, more colloquially known as patent trolls.
A Case For The Public Domain, Clark Asay
A Case For The Public Domain, Clark Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Over the past several decades open license movements have proven highly successful in the software and content worlds. Such movements rely in part on the belief that greater freedom of use triggers innovative activity that is superior to what a restrictive IP approach produces. Ironically, such open license movements also rely on IP rights to promote their vision of freedom and openness. They do so through IP licenses that, while granting significant freedoms, also impose certain conditions on users such as the “copyleft” requirement in the software world. Such movements rely on this IP-based approach due to fears that, without …
Kirtsaeng And The First-Sale Doctrine's Digital Problem, Clark D. Asay
Kirtsaeng And The First-Sale Doctrine's Digital Problem, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Many have lauded the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. as a significant victory for the first-sale doctrine under copyright law. However, in the digital context, the Kirtsaeng holding and the first-sale doctrine in general face extinction. This Essay argues for the first-sale doctrine's survival in the digital context.
A Case For The Public Domain, Clark D. Asay
A Case For The Public Domain, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Over the past several decades open license movements have proven highly successful in the software and content worlds. Such movements rely in part on the belief that greater freedom of use triggers innovative activity that is superior to what a restrictive IP approach produces. Ironically, such open license movements also rely on IP rights to promote their vision of freedom and openness. They do so through IP licenses that, while granting significant freedoms, also impose certain conditions on users such as the “copyleft” requirement in the software world. Such movements rely on this IP-based approach due to fears that, without …
Adjustments, Extensions, Disclaimers, And Continuations: When Do Patent Term Adjustments Make Sense?, Stephanie Plamondon Bair
Adjustments, Extensions, Disclaimers, And Continuations: When Do Patent Term Adjustments Make Sense?, Stephanie Plamondon Bair
Faculty Scholarship
The United States patent system represents a measured trade-off between two competing policy considerations: providing sufficient incentives to encourage the innovation and development of new and socially useful inventions; and ensuring that such inventions are readily available to the public at an affordable price. Although the default patent term is now twenty years from filing, various features of, and changes to, the patent system over the years have allowed patent owners to extend the duration of their patent monopolies, sometimes for several years. Such extensions, though seemingly insignificant when compared to the full patent term, have an enormous impact on …